Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bakeman, 1982, Social rules governing object conflicts in toddlers and preschoolers, 99
Bakeman, 1997
Baker, 1999, Argumentation and constructive interaction, 179
Bakhtin, 1981
Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, E., & Kirschner, P. (2004). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Paper presented at the American educational research association conference, San Diego, CA.
Buckingham-Shum, 1997, Graphical argumentation and design cognition, Human–Computer Interaction, 12, 267, 10.1207/s15327051hci1203_2
Butler, 1990, Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: implications for leadership evaluations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 48, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.48
Cho, 2002, The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving, Educational Technology Research & Development, 50, 5, 10.1007/BF02505022
Collins, C., & Collins, S. (1996). The Internet as a tool. (ERICK: ED 398 883)
Derry, 2000, Section on teaching, learning, and human development – Fostering students’ statistical and scientific thinking: lesson learned from an innovative college course, American Educational Research Journal, 37, 747, 10.3102/00028312037003747
Duffy, 1998, Critical thinking in a distributed environment: a pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems, 51
Garrison, 2000, Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: a shift from structural to transactional issues, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1, 1, 10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2
Gottman, 1979
Gunawardena, 1997, Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397, 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
Hewitt, J., & Teplovs, C. (1999). An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. In Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL) 1999 conference, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Available from http://www.ciltkn.org/cscl99. Retrieved June 01.06.04
Hiltz, 1986, Experiments in group decision making: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences, Decision Support Systems, 5, 217, 10.1016/0167-9236(89)90008-0
Hollingshead, 1996, Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: the effects of communication media, Human Communication Research, 23, 193, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x
Jeong, 2003, Sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in threaded discussions, The American Journal of Distance Education, 17, 25, 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_3
Jeong, A. (2003b). Gender interactions in on-line debates: look who’s arguing with whom. Paper presented at the Association for educational communications and technology conference, Dallas, TX.
Jeong, A. (2003c). The effects of message-reply and time-based structures on group interactions and critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions. Paper presented at the association of educational communication & technology conference, Anaheim, CA.
Jeong, 2004, The combined effects of response time and message content on group interactions in computer-supported collaborative argumentation, Journal of Distance Education, 19
Johnson, 1992
Jonassen, D., & Remidez, H. (2002). Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conference. Paper presented at computer support for collaborative learning 2002 conference: Foundations for a CSCL community, Boulder, CO. Available from http://newmedia.colorado.edu/cscl/12.html. Retrieved 20.02.02.
Koschmann, T., 1999. Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s Contribution to Understanding Learning in Settings of Collaboration. In Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL) 1999 conference.
Leinonen, T., Virtanen, O., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Collaborative discovering of key ideas in knowledge building. In Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning 2002 conference, Boulder, CO. Available from http://fle3.uiah.fi. Retrieved 19.05.04
Lemus, 2004, Argument and decision making in computer-mediated groups, Journal of Communication, 54, 302, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02630.x
Levin, 1990, Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks, 185
Lipman, 1991
McAlister, S. R. (2001). Argumentation and a design for learning. (CALRG Report No.197). Available from http://iet.open.ac.uk/pp/s.r.mcalister/personal/197.pdf. Retrieved 03.03.04
McAlister, S. (2003). Assessing good argumentation. Available from http://iet.open.ac.uk/pp/s.r.mcalister/personal/AssessingGEA.htm. Retrieved 10.04.04
Newman, 1995, The psychology of the new media, Educom Review, 30, 48
Olson, 1994, Characterizing the sequential structure of interactive behaviors through statistical and grammatical techniques, Human–Computer Interaction, 9, 427, 10.1207/s15327051hci0903&4_6
Poole, 1993, Group decision support systems and group communication: a comparison of decision making in computer-supported and nonsupported groups, Communication Research, 20, 176, 10.1177/009365093020002002
Ravits, J. (1997). An ISD model for building online communities: furthering the dialogue. In O. Abel, N. Maushak, & K. Wright (Eds.), In Proceedings for the 1997 national convention of the association for educational communications and technology (pp. 297–307).
Rourke, 2001, Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12
Saba, 1994, Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education, The American Journal of Distance Education, 8, 6, 10.1080/08923649409526844
Sappo, 1998, Developing dialogic communication culture in media education: integrating dialogism and technology, Media Education Publication, 7
Schmidt, 1999, Of maps and scripts: the status of formal constructs in cooperative work, Information and Software Technology, 41, 319, 10.1016/S0950-5849(98)00065-2
Sloffer, S., Dueber, B., & Duffy, M. T. (1999). Using asynchronous conferencing to promote critical thinking: two implementations in higher education. Paper presented at the 32nd conference on system sciences, Maui, Hawaii, January 5–8.
Sproull, 1991
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2004). Can computer-supported cooperation scripts facilitate argumentative knowledge construction? Paper presented at the 2004 American educational research association conference, San Diego, CA. Available from http://home.emp.paed.uni-muenchen.de/~weinberg/download. Retrieved 24.05.04
Stern, 1974, Mother and infant at play: the dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal, and gaze behaviors, 187
Suthers, D. (1998). Representations for scaffolding collaborative inquiry on ill-structured problems. Paper presented at the 1998 American educational research association conference, San Diego, CA.
Suthers, 2001, Learning by constructing collaborative representations: an empirical comparison of three alternatives, 577
Suthers, 2003, The roles of representations in face-to-face and online computer supported collaborative learning, Computers & Education, 41, 335, 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.04.001
Tan, S.C. (2000). Supporting collaborative problem solving through computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
Tannen, 1990
Tisdell, 1993, Interlocking systems of power, privilege, and oppression in adult higher education classes, Adult Education Quarterly, 43, 204, 10.1177/0741713693043004001
Toulmin, 1958
Turoff, 1998, Superconnectivity, CACM, 41, 10.1145/278476.278499
Vanfossen, B. (1996). Gender differences in communication. Institute for teaching and research on women. Towson, MD: Towson University. Available from: http://www.towson.edu/~vanfoss/wmcommm.htm. Retrieved 14.03.02
Veerman, A. L., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kansellaar, G. (1999). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation. Paper presented at the conference on computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL’99), San Francisco, CA.
Ward, 1997, Adding educational value to the Web: active learning with a live page, Educational Technology, 22
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2001). Scripts and scaffolds in problem-based computer supported collaborative learning environments: fostering participation and transfer (Research report No. 144). Ludwig-Maximilians University, Institute for Empirical Pedagogy and Pedagogical Psychology, Munich. Available from http://home.emp.paed.uni-muenchen.de/~weinberg/download. Retrieved 24.05.04
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2004). Knowledge convergence in computer-mediated learning environments: effects of collaboration scripts. Paper presented at the American educational research association conference, San Diego, CA.
Wiley, 1999, Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301, 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301