Aquaculture innovation system analysis of transition to sustainable intensification in shrimp farming

Agronomy for Sustainable Development - Tập 38 - Trang 1-11 - 2018
Olivier M. Joffre1,2, Laurens Klerkx1, Tran N. D. Khoa3
1Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
2WorldFish, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
3College of Aquaculture, Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam

Tóm tắt

The shrimp sector has been one of the fastest growing agri-food systems in the last decades, but its growth has entailed negative social and environmental impacts. Sustainable intensification will require innovation in multiple elements of the shrimp production system and its value chain. We use the case of the shrimp sector in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam to explore the constraints in the transition to sustainable intensification in shrimp farming, using an analytical framework based on innovation systems thinking, i.e., an aquaculture innovation systems framework. Using this framework, we conduct a systemic diagnostic of blocking mechanisms, interrelated sets of constraints within the aquaculture sector that hinder a transition toward sustainable intensification. Our findings show that the major constraints are institutional, with limited enforcement of the regulatory framework for input quality control, disease control, and wastewater management, and a lack of coordination between government bodies to design and enforce this framework. At farm level, limited access to capital favors pond mismanagement and the use of low-quality inputs. The absence of multi-stakeholder initiatives to foster dialog between actors in the value chain constrains the response to new regulations dictated by international market demand. Because of shrimp farming’s connectivity with the wider ecosystem, sustainable intensification in shrimp farming will require collective management of water resources at the landscape level for disease and water pollution control. Ecological principles for pond management need to be promoted to farmers in order to reduce farmers’ inefficient practices and build their capacity to understand new techniques and inputs available in the Vietnamese market. Our paper demonstrates for the utility of a multi-level, multi-dimension, and multi-stakeholder aquaculture innovation systems approach to analyze and address these blocking mechanisms in the transition to sustainable intensification in shrimp farming and aquaculture more broadly.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amankwah K, Klerkx L, Oosting SJ, Sakyi-Dawson O, van der Zijpp AJ, Millar D (2012) Diagnosing constraints to market participation of small ruminant producers in northern Ghana: an innovation systems analysis. NJAS - Wagen J Life Sci 60(63):37–47 Beveridge MCM, Thilsted SH, Phillips MJ, Metian M, Troell M, Hall S (2013) Meeting the food and nutrition needs of the poor: the role of fish and the opportunities and challenges emerging from the rise of aquaculture. J Fish Biol 83:1067–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12187 Boyd CE, Engle C (2017) Resource use assessment of shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei and Penaeus monodon, production in Thailand and Vietnam. J World Aquacult Soc 48(2):201–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12394 Bush SR, van Zieten PAM, Visser L et al (2010) Scenarios for resilient shrimp aquaculture in tropical coastal areas. Ecol Soc 15(2):15 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art15/ Dentoni D, Klerkx L (2015) Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes. Mar Policy 60:259–271 Doloreux D, Isaksen A, Aslene A, Melancon Y (2009) A comparative study of the aquaculture innovation Systems in Quebec’s coastal region and Norway. Eur Plan Stud 17(7):963–981 Dosi G (2000) Innovation, organization and economic dynamics: selected essays. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA. Duru M, Therond O, Fares M (2015) Designing agroecological transitions; a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:1237–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x. Engle C, Mc Nevin A, Racine P et al (2017) Economics of sustainable intensification of aquaculture: evidence from shrimp farms in Vietnam and Thailand. J World Aquacult Soc 48(2):227–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12423 FAO (2014). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO Rome Hai TN, Minh TH, Phu TQ, Phuong NT (2016) Shrimp industry in Vietnam. In: Liao C, Chao NH, Leano EM (ed) Progress of shrimp and prawn aquaculture in the world. National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung Taiwan, The Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines, and Word Aquaculture Society, Louisiana, USA, pp. 181–204 Hall D (2004) Explaining the diversity of Southeast Asian shrimp aquaculture. J Agrar Chang 4:315–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00081.x Hamilton S (2013) Assessing the role of commercial aquaculture in displacing mangrove forest. B Mar Sci 89(2):585–601. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2012.1069 Hatje V, de Souza MM, Ribeiro LS, Eca GF, Barros F (2016) Detection of environmental impacts of shrimp farming through multiple lines of evidence. Environ Pollut 219:672–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.056 Hoa TTT, Zwart MP, Phuong NT, Vlak JM, de Jong MCM (2011) Transmission of white spot syndrome virus in improved-extensive and semi-intensive shrimp production systems: a molecular epidemiology study. Aquaculture 313:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.01.013 Jespersen KS, Kelling I, Ponte S, Kruijsen F (2014) What shapes food value chains? Lessons from aquaculture in Asia. Food Policy 49:228–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.08.004 Joffre OM, Klerkx L, Dickson M, Verdegem M (2017) How is innovation in aquaculture conceptualized and managed? A systematic literature review and reflection framework to inform analysis and action. Aquaculture 470:129–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.12.020 Kebebe E, Duncan AJ, Klerkx L, de Boer IJM, Oosting SJ (2015) Understanding socio-economic and policy constraints to dairy development in Ethiopia: a coupled functional-structural innovation systems analysis. Agric Syst 141:69–78 Klein Woolthuis R, Lankhuizen M, Gilsing V (2005) A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation 25:609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002 König B, Janker J, Reinhardt T, Villarroel M, Junge R (2018) Analysis of aquaponics as an emerging technological innovation system. J Clean Prod 180:232–243 Lamers D, Schut M, Klerkx L, van Asten P (2017) Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development. Sci Public Policy 44:739–752 Lamprinopoulou C, Renwick A, Klerkx L, Hermans F, Roep D (2014) Application of an integrated systemic framework for analysing agricultural innovation systems and informing innovation policies: comparing the Dutch and Scottish agrifood sectors. Agric Syst 129:40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.001 Little DC, Newton RW, Beveridge MCM (2016) Aquaculture: a rapidly growing and significant source of sustainable food? Status, transitions and potential. Proc Nutr Soc 75:274–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000665 Lundvall BA (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning Pinter, London. Lutrell C (2006) Adapting to aquaculture in Vietnam: securing livelihoods in a context of change in two coastal communities. In: Hoanh CT, Tuong TP, Gowing JW, Hardy B (eds) Environment and livelihood in tropical coastal zones. Cab International, Wallingford, UK, pp 17–29 Malerba F (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res Policy 31:247–264 Minh TT, Larsen CES, Neef A (2010) Challenges to institutionalizing participatory extension: the case of farmer livestock schools in Vietnam. J Agric Educ Ext 16(2):179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892241003651449 Omoto R, Scott S (2016) Multifunctionality and agrarian transition in alternative agro-food production in the global South: the case of organic shrimp certification in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Asia Pac View 57(1):121–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12113 Pigford A-AE, Hickey GM, Klerkx L (2018) Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agric Syst 164:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.007 Phillips M, Subashinghe RP, Tran N, Kassam L (2016) Aquaculture big numbers. FAO. Rome Schut M, Klerkx L, Rodenburg J, Kayeke J, Hinnou LC, Raboanarielina CM, Adegbola PY, van Ast A, Bastiaans L (2015) RAAIS: rapid appraisal of agricultural innovation systems (part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity. Agric Syst 132:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.009 Spedding CRW (1998) An introduction to agricultural systems, second edn. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, NewYork Struik PC, Klerkx L, Hounkonnou D (2014) Unravelling institutional determinants affecting change in agriculture in West Africa. Int J Agr Sustain 12(3):370–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.909642 Tacon AGJ, Metian M (2009) Fishing for feed or fishing for food: increasing global competition for small pelagic forage fish. AMBIO 38(6):294–302. https://doi.org/10.1579/08-A-574.1 Thitamadee S, Prachumwat A, Srisala J, Jaroenlak P, Salachan PV, Sritunyalucksana K, Flegel TW, Itsathitphaisarn O (2016) Review of current disease threats for cultivated penaeid shrimp in Asia. Aquaculture 452:69–87. Available at. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.10.028 Totin E, van Mierlo B, Saïdou A, Mongbo R, Agbossou E, Stroosnijder L, Leeuwis C (2012) Barriers and opportunities for innovation in rice production in the inland valleys of Benin. NJAS - Wagen J Life Sci 60(63):57–66 Tran N, Bailey C, Wilson N, Phillips M (2013) Governance of global value chains in response to food safety and certification standards: the case of shrimp from Vietnam. World Dev 45:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.025 Turner JA, Klerkx L, Rijswijk K, Williams T, Barnard T (2016) Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand agricultural innovation system: identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics. NJAS - Wagen J Life Sci 76:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2015.12.001 Van Mierlo AM, Leeuwis C (2010) Enhancing the reflexivity of system innovation projects with system analyses. Am J Eval 31(2):143–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010366046 Wesseling JH, Van der Vooren A (2016) Lock-in of mature innovation systems: the transformation toward clean concrete in the Netherlands. J Clean Prod 155(2):114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.115 Wezel A, Soboksa G, McClelland S, Delespesse F, Boisseau A (2015) The blurred boundaries of ecological, sustainable, and agroecological intensification: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:1283–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0333-y Wieczorek AJ, Hekkert MP (2012) Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Sci Public Policy 39:74–87 Wigboldus S, Klerkx L, Leeuwis C, Schut M, Muilerman S, Jochemsen H (2016) Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0380-z WWF (2014) The growth of soy: impacts and solutions. WWF International, Gland