Client-oriented evaluation of ‘creative destruction’ in policy mixes: Finnish policies on building energy efficiency transition

Kivimaa, 2016, Creative destruction or mere niche creation? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 45, 205, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 Schot, 2016 Janssen, 2016 Kivimaa, 2014, Policy mixes, policy interplay and low carbon transitions: the case of passenger transport in Finland, Environ. Policy Gov., 24, 28, 10.1002/eet.1629 Reichardt, 2016, Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 106, 11, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029 Kern, 2017, Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 23, 11, 10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.002 Rogge, 2016, Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis, Res. Policy, 45, 1620, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 Bakker, 2013, Policy options to support the adoption of electric vehicles in the urban environment, Transp. Res. Part D, 25, 18, 10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.005 Van Der Vooren, 2015, Environmental innovation and societal transitions evaluating CO2 reduction policy mixes in the automotive sector, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 14, 60, 10.1016/j.eist.2013.10.001 Bolton, 2016, Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: towards a systems understanding, Res. Policy, 45, 1731, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.003 Nolden, 2016, Catalysing the energy service market: the role of intermediaries, Energy Policy, 98, 420, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.041 de Vries, 2014, Impact of changes in regulatory performance standards on innovation: a case of energy performance standards for newly-built houses, Technovation, 48–49, 56 Mlecnik, 2013, Opportunities for supplier-led systemic innovation in highly energy-efficient housing, J. Clean. Prod., 56, 103, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.009 Hannon, 2015, UK Local Authority engagement with the Energy Service Company (ESCo) model: key characteristics, benefits, limitations and considerations, Energy Policy, 78, 198, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.016 Nolden, 2016, The UK market for energy service contracts in 2014–2015, Energy Effic., 9, 1405, 10.1007/s12053-016-9430-2 Vedung, 2000, Evaluation research and fundamental research, 103 Magro, 2013, Complex innovation policy systems: towards an evaluation mix, Res. Policy, 42, 1647, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005 Bergek, 2008, Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Res. Policy, 37, 407, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 Suurs, 2009, Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: the case of biofuels in the Netherlands, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 76, 1003, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.002 Flanagan, 2011, Reconceptualising the policy mix for innovation, Res. Policy, 40, 702, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005 Kern, 2009, Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector, Policy Sci., 42, 391, 10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x Howlett, 2013, Patching vs packaging in policy formulation complementary effects, goodness of fit, degrees of freedom, and feasibility in policy portfolio design, Polit. Gov., 1, 170, 10.17645/pag.v1i2.95 Howlett, 2007, Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in new governance arrangements, Policy Soc., 26, 1 Lanahan, 2015, Multilevel innovation policy mix: a closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program, Res. Policy, 44, 1387, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.002 Borrás, 2013, The choice of innovation policy instruments, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 80, 1513, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002 Nauwelaers, 2009 del Rio, 2010, Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: the impact of different instruments and design elements, Energy Policy J., 38, 4978, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.003 Huttunen, 2014, The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 12, 14, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.002 Rosenow, 2016, Energy efficiency and the policy mix, Build. Res. Inf., 44, 562, 10.1080/09613218.2016.1138803 Cantner, 2016, Inventor networks in renewable energies: the influence of the policy mix in Germany, Res. Policy, 45, 1165, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.005 Mahzouni, 2015, The policy mix for sustainable urban transition: the city district of Hammarby Sjöstad in Stockholm, Environ. Policy Gov., 25, 288, 10.1002/eet.1688 Uyarra, 2016, Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: challenges of a place-blind policy mix, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 103, 264, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.008 Bontoux, 2016, Using scenarios to assess policy mixes for resource efficiency and eco-innovation in different Fiscal Policy frameworks, Sustainability, 8, 309, 10.3390/su8040309 Hekkert, 2009, Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 76, 584, 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013 Bergek, 2002 Jacobsson, 2004, Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology, Ind. Corp. Change, 13, 815, 10.1093/icc/dth032 Hekkert, 2007, Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 74, 413, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 Kampezidis, 2011, Evaluating policy options for increasing the RES-E penetration in Greece, Energy Policy, 39, 5388, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.025 Creten, 2014, Evaluating transition management: synergies between old and new approaches Boons, 2013, Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview, J. Clean. Prod., 45, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013 Hansen, 2010, Theory-based stakeholder evaluation, Am. J. Eval., 31, 295, 10.1177/1098214010366174 Murphy, 2012, A qualitative evaluation of policy instruments used to improve energy performance of existing private dwellings in the Netherlands, Energy Policy, 45, 459, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.056 Hansen, 2005, Choosing evaluation models, Evaluation, 11, 447, 10.1177/1356389005060265 Nykamp, 2016, A transition to green buildings in Norway, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 24, 83, 10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.006 Fischer, 2009, Re-interpreting regulations: architects as intermediaries for low-carbon buildings, Urban Stud., 46, 2577, 10.1177/0042098009344228 Ely, 2014, Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: approaches to enhance international development, co-ordination and democratisation, Res. Policy, 43, 505, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.004 IEA, 2013, Energy Policies of IEA Countries PMO, 2011. Pääministeri Jyrki Kataisen hallituksen ohjelma 22.6.2011 [the programme of Prime Minister Jyrki Katainen’s government 22.6.2011]. Prime Minister’s Office, Finland. Sabel, 2012, Experimentalist governance, 169 Kivimaa, 2016, Low Carbon Transition in Finnish Mobility: The clash of experimental transport governance and established practices? Kivimaa, 2017, Innovation, low-energy buildings and intermediaries in Europe: Systemic case study review, Energy Effic.