Acceptance of automated vehicles: Gender effects, but lack of meaningful association with desire for control in Germany and in the U.S.

Klemens Weigl1,2, Michael A. Nees3, Daniel Eisele4, Andreas Riener1
1Human-Computer Interaction Group, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt (THI), 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany
2Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
3Department of Psychology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA
4Chair of Traffic and Transportation Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abraham, 2017, Autonomous vehicles and alternatives to driving: trust, preferences, and effects of age Adell, E., Várhelyi, A., Nilsson, L., 2014. The Definition of Acceptance and Acceptability. In: Driver Acceptance of New Technology (pp. 11-22). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315578132-2. Acheampong, 2021, Can autonomous vehicles enable sustainable mobility in future cities? Insights and policy challenges from user preferences over different urban transport options, Cities, 112, 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103134 Alessandrini, 2015, Automated vehicles and the rethinking of mobility and cities, Transp. Res. Procedia, 5, 145, 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.01.002 Bansal, 2016, Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 67, 1, 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019 Bazilinskyy, 2015, An international crowdsourcing study into people’s statements on fully automated driving, Procedia Manuf., 3, 2534, 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.540 Becker, 2017, Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles, Transportation, 44, 1293, 10.1007/s11116-017-9808-9 Becker, J. (2020, September 24). A Brief History of Automated Driving — Part Three: Toward Product Development. Apex.AI. https://www.apex.ai/post/a-brief-history-of-automated-driving-part-three-toward-product-development. Benleulmi, A.Z., Blecker, T., 2017. Investigating the factors influencing the acceptance of fully autonomous cars, in: Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. In: Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), 23. 99–115. https://doi.org/10.15480/882.144. Brell, 2019, Suspicious minds? – users’ perceptions of autonomous and connected driving, Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., 20, 301, 10.1080/1463922X.2018.1485985 Buckley, 2018, Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: a simulated driving study, Accid. Anal. Prev., 115, 202, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021 Burger, 1992, Desire for control and academic performance, Can. J. Behav. Sci. Can. Sci. Comport., 24, 147, 10.1037/h0078716 Burger, 2013 Burger, 1979, The desirability of control, Motiv. Emot., 3, 381, 10.1007/BF00994052 Burger, 1994, Changes in desire for control over time: Gender differences in a ten-year longitudinal study, Sex Roles, 31, 465, 10.1007/BF01544201 Charness, 2018, Predictors of attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: the roles of age, gender, prior knowledge, and personality, Front. Psychol., 9, 2589, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02589 Chen, 2019, Traffic dynamics under speed disturbance in mixed traffic with automated and non-automated vehicles, Transp. Res. Procedia, 38, 709, 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.05.037 Cohen, 1992, A power primer, Psychol. Bull., 112, 155, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 Cohen, 1988 Cortina, 1993, What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications, J. Appl. Psychol., 78, 98, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 Cronbach, 1951, Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, 297, 10.1007/BF02310555 Cronbach, 1963, Theory of generalizability: a liberalization of reliability theory, Br. J. Stat. Psychol., 16, 137, 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1963.tb00206.x De Winter, 2021, Acceptance of conditionally automated cars: Just one factor?, Researchgate. Dicianno, 2021, Systematic review: automated vehicles and services for people with disabilities, Neurosci. Lett., 761, 136103, 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136103 Dong, 2019, Transit user perceptions of driverless buses, Transportation, 46, 35, 10.1007/s11116-017-9786-y Edelmann, 2021, Cross-cultural differences in the acceptance of decisions of automated vehicles, Appl. Ergon., 92, 103346, 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103346 Edmonds, E. (2018, May 22). AAA: American Trust in Autonomous Vehicles Slips. AAA NewsRoom. https://newsroom.aaa.com/2018/05/aaa-american-trust-autonomous-vehicles-slips/. Efron, 1987, Better bootstrap confidence intervals, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 82, 171, 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410 Esterwood, 2021, Barriers to AV Bus Acceptance: A National Survey and Research Agenda, Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., 1391, 10.1080/10447318.2021.1886485 Fagnant, 2015, Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations, Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract., 77, 167, 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003 Faraji-Rad, 2017, Consumer desire for control as a barrier to new product adoption, J. Consum. Psychol., 27, 347, 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.08.002 Fraedrich, E., Cyganski, R., Wolf, I., Lenz, B., 2016. User Perspectives on Autonomous Driving - A Use-Case-Driven Study in Germany (No. 187). Geographisches Institut, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2539.4969. Gebhardt, 2002, Desirability of control: psychometric properties and relationships with locus of control, personality, coping, and mental and somatic complaints in three Dutch samples, Eur. J. Personal., 16, 423, 10.1002/per.463 George, 2003 Gkartzonikas, 2019, What have we learned? A review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles, Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., 98, 323, 10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.003 Golbabaei, 2020, Individual predictors of autonomous vehicle public acceptance and intention to use: a systematic review of the literature, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 6, 106, 10.3390/joitmc6040106 Goldberg, 1993, The structure of phenotypic personality traits, Am. Psychol., 48, 26, 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26 Hammond, 2001, The influence of desire for control on drivers’ risk-taking behaviour, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 4, 271, 10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00028-6 Harb, 2021, What do we (Not) know about our future with automated vehicles?, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 123, 102948, 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102948 Heidenreich, 2015, What about passive innovation resistance? Investigating adoption-related behavior from a resistance perspective, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., 32, 878, 10.1111/jpim.12161 Herrenkind, 2019, Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 74, 255, 10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.003 Hilgarter, 2020, Public perception of autonomous vehicles: a qualitative study based on interviews after riding an autonomous shuttle, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 72, 226, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.012 Hohenberger, 2016, How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups, Transp. Res. Part A Policy & Practice, 374, 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.022 Holm, 1979, A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, Scand. J. Stat., 6, 65 Howard, 2014, Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California, 1 IBM Corp., 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Hulse, 2018, Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age, Safety Sci., 102, 1, 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001 Josten, 2018, What to Expect of Automated Driving: Expectations and Anticipation of System Behavior, 606 Kalra, 2017, The Enemy of Good: Estimating the Cost of Waiting for Nearly Perfect Automated Vehicles, Rand Corporation. Kaye, 2020, A priori acceptance of highly automated cars in Australia, France, and Sweden: a theoretically-informed investigation guided by the TPB and UTAUT, Accid. Anal. Prev., 137, 105441, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105441 Kaye, 2021, Users’ acceptance of private automated vehicles: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Safety Res., 79, 352, 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.10.002 Keszey, 2020, Behavioural intention to use autonomous vehicles: systematic review and empirical extension, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 119, 102732, 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102732 König, 2017, Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: the case of the self-driving car, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 44, 42, 10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013 Kyriakidis, 2015, Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 32, 127, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014 Lee, 2021, Consumer knowledge and acceptance of driving automation: changes over time and across age groups, Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., 65, 1395, 10.1177/1071181321651116 Lee, 2018, Understanding attitudes towards self-driving vehicles: quantitative analysis of qualitative data, Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., 62, 1399, 10.1177/1541931218621319 Limesurvey Project Team, 2021 Litman, 2017, TurkPrime. com: a versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences, Behav. Res. Methods, 49, 433, 10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z Litman, T., 2020. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning. https://www.vtpi.org/avip.pdf. Liu, 2020, Positive, negative, ambivalent, or indifferent? Exploring the structure of public attitudes toward self-driving vehicles on public roads, Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract., 142, 27, 10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.008 McCutcheon, 2000, The desirability of control scale: still reliable and valid twenty years later, Curr. Res. Soc. Psychol., 5, 225 McKenna, 1993, It won’t happen to me: unrealistic optimism or illusion of control?, Br. J. Psychol., 84, 39, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1993.tb02461.x Merfeld, 2019, Being driven autonomously–A qualitative study to elicit consumers’ overarching motivational structures, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 107, 229, 10.1016/j.trc.2019.08.007 Müller, A., Stockinger, C., Walter, J., Abendroth, B., & Bruder, R. (2017). Einflussfaktoren auf die Akzeptanz des automatisierten Fahrens aus der Sicht von Fahrerinnen und Fahrern. In H. Winner & R. Bruder (Eds.), Wie wollen wir automatisiert fahren? (pp. 1–22). https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/5672/1/Mensch%20und%20Fahrzeug%20Tagungsband%202017.pdf. Nastjuk, 2020, What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user’s perspective, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 161, 120319, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120319 Nees, 2019, Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? An examination of a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars, J. Safety Res., 69, 61, 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.02.002 Nees, 2016, Acceptance of self-driving cars: an examination of idealized versus realistic portrayals with a self- driving car acceptance scale, Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., 60, 1449, 10.1177/1541931213601332 Nees, 2021, Relationships among driving styles, desire for control, illusion of control, and self-reported driving behaviors, Traffic Inj. Prev., 22, 372, 10.1080/15389588.2021.1909728 Nees, M.A., Zhang, J., 2020. Acceptance of Highly Automated Vehicles: A Factor Analysis Approach (Technical Report Preprint No. #HFPC-2020-01). Human Factors, Perception, & Cognition Lab, Lafayette College. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9qcjp. Nielsen, 2018, On sceptics and enthusiasts: what are the expectations towards self-driving cars?, Transp. Policy, 66, 49, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.004 Nordhoff, 2018, User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: a questionnaire study, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 58, 843, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.024 Nunnally, 1994 Pettigrew, S., Worrall, C., Talati, Z., Fritschi, L., Norman, R., 2019. Dimensions of attitudes to autonomous vehicles. Urban Plan. Transp. Res. https://doi.org/10.1037/t73857-000. Pakusch, 2017, User Acceptance of Fully Autonomous Public Transport, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications, 52, 10.5220/0006472900520060 Penmetsa, 2019, Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles – A snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 9, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.010 Pigeon, 2021, Factors of acceptability, acceptance and usage for non-rail autonomous public transport vehicles: a systematic literature review, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 81, 251, 10.1016/j.trf.2021.06.008 Planing, 2014 Rödel, 2014, Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience, 1 Rogers, 2003 SAE_J3016, 2021. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. Society of Automobile Engineers. https://doi.org/10.4271/J3016_202104. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., 2016. Motorists’ preferences for different levels of vehicle automation: 2016 (No. SWT-2016-8). The University of Michigan, Sustainable Worldwide Transportation. http://websites.umich.edu/~umtriswt/PDF/SWT-2016-8.pdf. Sener, 2019, Measures of baseline intent to use automated vehicles: a case study of Texas cities, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 62, 66, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.12.014 Syahrivar, 2021, Surrendering personal control to automation: Appalling or appealing?, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 80, 90, 10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.018 Tennant, 2019, Public discomfort at the prospect of autonomous vehicles: building on previous surveys to measure attitudes in 11 countries, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 64, 98, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.017 Van Der Laan, 1997, A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 5, 1, 10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3 Wang, 2020, Attitudes towards privately-owned and shared autonomous vehicles, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 72, 297, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.014 Weigl, 2020, The Impact of Regular Outdoor Cycling and Gender on Technology Trust and Distrust in Cars, and on Anxiety, 83 Weigl, 2021, Development of the questionnaire on the acceptance of automated driving (QAAD): Data-driven models for Level 3 and Level 5 automated driving, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 83, 42, 10.1016/j.trf.2021.09.011 Wintersberger, 2016, 51 Wolf, 2016, 103 Xiao, 2021, Safety improvements by intelligent connected vehicle technologies: a meta-analysis considering market penetration rates, Accid. Anal. Prev., 159, 106234, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106234 Xu, 2018, What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 95, 320, 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024 Zhang, 2021, What drives people to use automated vehicles? A meta-analytic review, Accid. Anal. Prev., 159, 106270, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106270 Zhu, 2019, An automated vehicle fuel economy benefits evaluation framework using real-world travel and traffic data, IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., 11, 29, 10.1109/MITS.2019.2919537 Zmud, 2016, Consumer acceptance and travel behavior: impacts of automated vehicles, Texas A&M Transp. Inst. Zoellick, 2019, Amused, accepted, and used? Attitudes and emotions towards automated vehicles, their relationships, and predictive value for usage intention, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 65, 68, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.009