On ultimatum bargaining experiments — A personal review

Binmore, 1991, Do people exploit their bargaining power? An experimental study, Games and Economic Behaviour, 3, 295, 10.1016/0899-8256(91)90030-I Binmore, 1985, Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study, American Economic Review, 75, 1178 Bolton, 1991, A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence, American Economic Review, 81, 1096 Bolton, 1993 Brandstätter, 1992, Individual differences beyond and behind attitudes — Should economic psychology care about personality structures? Eckel, 1992, The price of fairness: Gender differences in punishment games Güth, 1989, Unique solutions for strategic games — Equilibrium selection based on resistance avoidance, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 10.1007/978-3-642-48367-7 Güth, 1992, Distributive justice versus bargaining power, 153 Güth, 1994, From ultimatum bargaining to dictatorship — An experimental study of four games with incomplete information Güth, 1996, Two level-ultimatum bargaining with incomplete information — An experimental study, The Economic Journal, 10.2307/2235565 Güth, 1993, Efficiency by trust in fairness? Multiperiod ultimatum bargaining experiments with an increasing cake, International Journal of Game Theory, 22, 51, 10.1007/BF01245570 Güth, 1982, An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organizations, 3, 367, 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 Güth, 1985, Strategic power versus distributive justice — An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, 129 Güth, 1986, Auctioning ultimatum bargaining decisions — How to decide if rational decisions are unacceptable?, 173 Güth, 1988, Ultimatum bargaining for a shrinking cake — An experimental analysis, 314, 111 Güth, 1990, Ultimatum bargaining behaviour — A survey and comparison of experimental results, Journal of Economic Psychology, 11, 417, 10.1016/0167-4870(90)90021-Z Güth, 1993, Information, fairness, and strategic behaviour in 3-person ultimatum bargaining Harrison, 1992, Expectations and fairness in a simple bargaining experiment Hoffman, 1992, Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games Kahneman, 1986, Fairness and the assumptions of economics, Journal of Business, 59, S285, 10.1086/296367 Kravitz, 1992, Decisions and perceptions of recipients in ultimatum bargaining games, Journal of Socio-Economics, 21, 65, 10.1016/1053-5357(92)90026-4 McKelvey, 1992, An experimental study of the centipede game, Econometrica, 60, 803, 10.2307/2951567 Mikula, 1977, Considerations of justice in allocation situations Mitzkewitz, 1993, Envy, greed, and anticipation in ultimatum games with incomplete information, International Journal of Game Theory, 22, 171, 10.1007/BF01243649 Nash, 1953, Two-person cooperative games, Econometrica, 21, 128, 10.2307/1906951 Neelin, 1988, A further test of noncooperative bargaining theory: Comment, The American Economic Review, 78, 824 Ochs, 1989, An experimental study of sequential bargaining, The American Economic Review, 79, 355 Oppewal, 1992, A three-person ultimatum game to investigate effects of differences in need, sharing rules and observability on bargaining behaviour, Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 203, 10.1016/0167-4870(92)90030-B Prasnikar, 1989, Fairness and considerations of strategy in bargaining: Some experimental data Roth, 1995, Bargaining experiments Roth, 1991, Bargaining and market behaviour in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study, The American Economic Review, 81, 1068 Rubinstein, 1982, Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica, 50, 97, 10.2307/1912531 Shapiro, 1975, Effects of future interaction in reward allocation in dyads: Equity or equality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 873, 10.1037/h0076703 Weg, 1990, Two-person bargaining behaviour in fixed discounting factors games with infinite horizon, Games and Economic Behaviour, 2, 76, 10.1016/0899-8256(90)90015-M Weg, 1993, On the failure to induce meager offers in ultimatum games, Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 17, 10.1016/0167-4870(93)90038-M