The limits of democratizing interest representation: ASEAN’s regional corporatism and normative challenges
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson BRO’G, 1972, Culture and Politics in Indonesia, 1
Anwar DF, 1994, Indonesia in ASEAN: Foreign Policy and Regionalism
ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Organization (2007) 30th Anniversary AIPO. Jakarta: AIPO.
Boesch EE, 1970, Zwiespältige Eliten. Eine sozialpsychologische Untersuchung über administrative Eliten in Thailand
Bourchier D, 1999, Indonesia: Law and Society, 186
Breaden B (n.d.) Japonesia, organic geopolitics and the South. Available at: http://www.apu.ac.jp/research/sympo/paper/Barnaby.pdf (accessed 29 September 2011).
Caballero-Anthony M, 2006, Globalization and Economic Security in East Asia. Governance and Institutions, 218
Chaloemtiarana T, 1979, Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism
Chandra AC, 2007, Southeast Asian Civil Society and the ASEAN Charter: The Way Forward
Chandra AC, 2009, Civil Society in Search of an Alternative Regionalism in ASEAN
Chenvidyakarn M (1979) Political control and economic influence: A study of trade associations in Thailand. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.
Chng MK, 1992, The ASEAN Reader, 58
Chua BH, 1995, Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore
Dano E, 2008, Building People-Oriented and Participatory Alternative Regionalism Models in Southeast Asia: An Exploratory Study
Gill R, 1997, ASEAN towards the 21st Century: A Thirty-Year Review of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
Hernandez CG, 2007, The Inclusive Regionalist: A Festschrift Dedicated to Jusuf Wanandi, 281
Igarashi S, 2011, World Political Science Review, 7, 1
Jetschke A, 2009, Cambridge Review of International Relations, 22, 407
Jetschke A, 2010, Human Rights and State Security: Indonesia and the Philippines
Korten DC (1984) Strategic management for people-centered development. Jakarta. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAQ821.pdf (accessed 21 October 2011).
Lindsey T, 2006, Violent Conflicts in Indonesia: Analysis, Representation, Resolution, 19
MacIntyre A (1994) Organising interests: Corporatism in Indonesian politics. Perth: Murdoch University, Asia Research Centre, Working Paper No. 43, August.
Magnis-Suseno F, 1997, Javanese Ethics and World-View: The Javanese Idea of the Good Life
Nair D (2010) Do stated goals matter? Regional institutions in East Asia and the dynamic of unstated Goals. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Working Paper 199.
Phongpaichit P, 2004, Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand
Pye LW, 1985, Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority
Radaelli C (2000) Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 4(8). Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-008a.htm (accessed 28 July 2008).
Reeve D, 1985, Golkar of Indonesia: An Alternative to the Party System
Rodan G (2006) Singapore’s ‘exceptionalism?’ Authoritarian rule and state transformation. Perth: Murdoch University, Working Paper No. 131.
Rüland J, Manea MG (2011) How much an actor and under which logics of action? Parliament in the democratic control of the armed forces in Indonesia and Nigeria. Osnabrück: German Foundation of Peace Research (unpublished research report).
Simanjuntak M (1989) Unsur Hegelian dalam pandangan negara integralistik Depok. Universitas Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum.
Theimer W, 1955, Geschichte der politischen Ideen
Vasil R, 1992, Governing Singapore
Vella WF, 1955, The Impact of the West on Government in Thailand
Wanandi J, 1995, Indonesian Quarterly, 23, 56
Wang PC (2012) Normative power Europe and Asia-Europe relations, Freiburg: Southeast Asian Studies, Occasional Paper No. 10, April.
Wiarda HJ, 1997, Corporatism and Comparative Politics: Another Great ‘Ism’
Wittig P, 1982, Der englische Weg zum Sozialismus. Die Fabier und ihre Bedeutung für die Labour Party und die englische Politik, 10.3790/978-3-428-45244-6
Wyatt D, 1984, Thailand: A Short History