Bayesian Interpretation of the EXCEL Trial and Other Randomized Clinical Trials of Left Main Coronary Artery Revascularization

JAMA Internal Medicine - Tập 180 Số 7 - Trang 986 - 2020
James M. Brophy1
1McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Takaro, 1976, The VA cooperative randomized study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease II: subgroup with significant left main lesions., Circulation, 54, III107

Serruys, 2009, Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease., N Engl J Med, 360, 961, 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626

Mohr, 2013, Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial., Lancet, 381, 629, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5

Thuijs, 2019, Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial., Lancet, 394, 1325, 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X

Morice, 2014, Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery trial., Circulation, 129, 2388, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006689

Holm, 2020, Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial., Lancet, 395, 191, 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1

Ahn, 2015, Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease: 5-year outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study., J Am Coll Cardiol, 65, 2198, 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.033

Stone, 2019, Five-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease., N Engl J Med, 381, 1820, 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406

Spiegelhalter, 1999, Methods in health service research: an introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment., BMJ, 319, 508, 10.1136/bmj.319.7208.508

Brophy, 1995, Placing trials in context using bayesian analysis: GUSTO revisited by Reverend Bayes., JAMA, 273, 871, 10.1001/jama.1995.03520350053028

Viechtbauer, 2010, Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package., J Stat Softw, 36, 1, 10.18637/jss.v036.i03

Buszman, 2008, Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization., J Am Coll Cardiol, 51, 538, 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.054

Buszman, 2016, Left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization: 10-year outcomes of the (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) LE MANS Trial., JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 9, 318, 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.044

Stone, 2016, Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease., N Engl J Med, 375, 2223, 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227

Greenland, 2016, Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations., Eur J Epidemiol, 31, 337, 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3

Wasserstein, 2016, The ASA’s statement on P values: context, process, and purpose., Am Stat, 70, 129, 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

Lundh, 2012, Industry sponsorship and research outcome., Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 12, 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2

Gelman, 2014, Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed

Europena Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Longer term outcomes for heart surgery significantly better than other procedures, new evidence finds. Posted October 5, 2019. Accessed January 21, 2020. https://www.eacts.org/longer-term-outcomes-for-heart-surgery-significantly-better-than-than-other-procedures-new-evidence-finds/

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

GitHub. Code for the figures and calculations: jama_intmed_code. Accessed April 21, 2020. https://github.com/brophyj/jama_intmed_code

TCTMD Cardiovascular Research Foundation. EACTS pulls out of left main guidelines after BBC bombshell alleging EXCEL trial cover-up. Published December 10, 2019. Accessed January 21, 2020. https://www.tctmd.com/news/eacts-pulls-out-left-main-guidelines-after-bbc-bombshell-alleging-excel-trial-cover

TCTMD Cardiovascular Research Foundation. Official response from EXCEL leadership. Published December 12, 2019. Accessed December 12, 2019. https://www.tctmd.com/slide/official-response-excel-leadership.

Kaiser Health News. Pre$crption For Power: patient advocacy group: Cardiovascular Research Foundation. Accessed November 18, 2019. https://khn.org/patient-advocacy/#