Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there an effect on all trials

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review - Tập 12 Số 1 - Trang 171-177 - 2005
Jean Saint‐Aubin1, Denis Ouellette1, Marie Poirier2
1Département de Psychologie, Université de Moncton, E1A 3E9, Moncton, NB, Canada
2City University, London, England

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Brooks, J. O., &Watkins, M. J. (1990). Further evidence of the intricacy of memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1134–1141.

Brown, G. D. A., &Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed?Journal of Memory & Language,34, 594–621.

Crowder, R. G. (1979). Similarity and order in memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 13, pp. 319–353). New York: Academic Press.

Estes, W. K. (1991). On types of item coding and sources of recall in short-term memory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 175–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hulme, C., Maughan, S., &Brown, G. D. A. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 685–701.

Hulme, C., Stuart, G., Brown, G. D. A., &Morin, C. (2003). Highand low-frequency words are recalled equally well in alternating lists: Evidence for associative effects in serial recall.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 500–518.

Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.

Multhaup, K. S., Balota, D. A., &Cowan, N. (1996). Implications of aging, lexicality, and item length for the mechanisms underlying memory span.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 112–120.

Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1976). Item and order information in short-term serial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,105, 191–216.

Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.

Neath, I. (1994, May).Temporal encoding and the auditory superiority Hypothesis. Paper presented at the 66th meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 316–327.

Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 429–441.

Poirier, M., &Saint-Aubin, J. (1995). Memory for related and unrelated words: Further evidence on the influence of semantic factors in immediate serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 384–404.

Roodenrys, S., &Quinlan, P. T. (2000). The effects of stimulus set size and word frequency on verbal serial recall.Memory,8, 71–78.

Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (1999). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there a detrimental effect on order information?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 367–394.

Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (2000). Immediate serial recall of words and nonwords: Tests of the retrieval-based hypothesis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 332–340.

Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (in press). Word frequency effects in immediate serial recall: Item familiarity and item co-occurrence have the same effect.Memory.

Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinominal processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 168–175.

Stuart, G., &Hulme, C. (2000). The effects of word co-occurrence on short-term memory: Associative links in long-term memory affect short-term memory performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 796–802.

Tehan, G., &Humphreys, M. S. (1995). Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.Memory & Cognition,23, 181–191.

Tolan, G. A., &Tehan, G. (1999). Determinants of short-term forgetting: Decay, retroactive interference, or proactive interference?International Journal of Psychology,34, 285–292.