Impact of Spodoptera frugiperda neonate pretreatment conditions on Vip3Aa19 insecticidal protein activity and laboratory bioassay variation

Pest Management Science - Tập 72 Số 4 - Trang 837-844 - 2016
Karen F. Da Silva1, Terence Spencer1, Carolina Camargo1, Blair D. Siegfried1,2, Frederick S. Walters3
1Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
2Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
3Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractBACKGROUND

Variation in response to insecticidal proteins is common upon repetition of insect bioassays. Understanding this variation is a prerequisite to detecting biologically important differences. We tracked neonate Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) susceptibility to Vip3Aa19 over 17 generations using standardized bioassay methods. Five larval pretreatment conditions and one bioassay condition were tested to determine whether susceptibility was affected. These included: storage time; prefeeding; storage at reduced temperature; storage at reduced humidity; colony introgression of field‐collected individuals. Extremes of photoperiod during the bioassay itself were also examined.

RESULTS

LC50 values for two strains of S. frugiperda varied 6.6‐fold or 8.8‐fold over 17 generations. Storage time and humidity had no impact on Vip3Aa19 susceptibility, whereas prefeeding significantly reduced subsequent mortality (by 27%). Storage at reduced temperature increased mortality for one colony (from 45.6 to 73.0%) but not for the other. Introgression of field‐collected individuals affected susceptibility at the first generation but not for subsequent generations. A 24 h bioassay photophase significantly reduced susceptibility (by 26%) for both colonies.

CONCLUSION

Certain pretreatment and bioassay conditions were identified that can affect S. frugiperda Vip3Aa19 susceptibility, but innate larval heterogeneity was also present. Our observations should help to increase the consistency of insecticidal protein bioassay results. © 2015 Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1093/jee/88.1.1

10.1093/jee/92.2.279

10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01541.x

10.1603/EC13374

10.1093/ae/53.4.208

10.1603/029.102.0426

10.1128/AEM.01855-07

10.1016/j.jip.2012.03.021

10.1016/j.jip.2006.08.005

10.1093/jee/86.4.989

Ali MI, 2011, Susceptibility of Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Vip3A insecticidal protein expressed in VipCot cotton, J Invertebr Pathol, 108, 76

10.1007/s10681-007-9643-8

10.1038/nbt1381

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Subpanel onBacillus thuringiensis(Bt) Plant‐Pesticides and Resistance Management 9–10 February 1998 Docket No. EPA‐HQ‐OPP‐00231 US Environmental Protection Agency Washington DC (1998).

2001, Bt Plant‐Incorporated Protectants; Biopesticides Registration Action Document

10.1093/jee/92.1.21

10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.925

Ali MI, 2003, Proc Beltwide Cotton Conf, 1138

10.1016/j.cropro.2014.06.019

10.1017/S0007485313000448

10.2307/3494084

10.1111/jen.12092

Lewis LC, 1969, Rearing the European corn borer on corn leaf and wheat germ diets, Iowa State J Sci, 44, 9

10.6028/jres.081A.011

Finney DJ, 1971, Probit Analysis, 350

1987, POLO‐PC: a User's Guide to Probit and Logit Analysis

10.1007/s11248-012-9658-3

10.1007/s11248-013-9778-4

10.1002/9781118352670.ch3

10.1128/AEM.69.8.4648-4657.2003

10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.014

10.4161/gmcr.1.5.14765

10.1128/AEM.67.10.4610-4613.2001

10.1093/jee/83.6.2211

10.1093/jee/92.3.547

10.1146/annurev.en.22.010177.001445

Leppla NC, 1989, Quality control in insect mass production: a review and model, Bull Entomol Soc Am, 70, 33