Quality and Value of Subspecialty Reinterpretation of Thoracic CT Scans of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Cancer Center

Journal of the American College of Radiology - Tập 14 - Trang 1109-1118 - 2017
Brett W. Carter1, Jeremy J. Erasmus1, Mylene T. Truong1, Jo-Anne O. Shepard2, Wayne Hofstetter3, Ryan Clarke4, Reginald F. Munden5, Joseph R. Steele6
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
2Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
3Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
4Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia
5Department of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
6Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Tài liệu tham khảo

2012 Lu, 2014, Providing formal reports for outside imaging and the rate of repeat imaging, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 203, 107, 10.2214/AJR.13.10617 Ettinger, 2015, Non-small cell lung cancer, version 6.2015, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 13, 515, 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0071 Ajani, 2015, Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 13, 194, 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0028 Kazerooni, 1998, Added value of thoracic radiology specialist interpretation of CT scans for lung cancer consultations in a thoracic surgery clinic (abstr), Radiology, 209, 171 Hricak, 1997, Value of expert interpretation in abdominal oncologic imaging: a multicenter study (abstr), Radiology, 205, 225 Wakeley, 1995, Audit of the value of double reading magnetic resonance imaging films, Br J Radiol, 68, 358, 10.1259/0007-1285-68-808-358 Picolli, 1993, Peer-review quality assessment method for MR imaging: lower-extremity results from 31 centers (abstr), Radiology, 189, 136 Bechtold, 1997, Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 21, 681, 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00001 Gollub, 1999, Clinical importance of reinterpretation of body CT scans obtained elsewhere in patients referred for care at a tertiary cancer center, Radiology, 210, 109, 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja47109 Loevner, 2002, Reinterpretation of cross-sectional images in patients with head and neck cancer in the setting of a multidisciplinary cancer center, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 23, 1622 Lysack, 2013, Impact of neuroradiologist second opinion on staging and management of head and neck cancer, J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 42, 39, 10.1186/1916-0216-42-39 Hendee, 2010, Addressing overutilization in medical imaging, Radiology, 257, 240, 10.1148/radiol.10100063 ACR–SCBT-MR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Thoracic Computed Tomography (CT). Available at: https://www.acr.org/∼/media/5618D8D775C441529D59DD0CF7A4057A.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2017. Lu, 2016, Secondary interpretation of CT examinations: frequency and payment in the Medicare fee-for-service population, J Am Coll Radiol, 13, 1096, 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.01.020 Viscomi, 2004, Quantification of clinical consultations in academic emergency radiology, Acad Radiol, 11, 1294, 10.1016/j.acra.2004.07.024 DiPiro, 2002, Volume and impact of second-opinion consultations by radiologists at a tertiary care cancer center: data, Acad Radiol, 9, 1430, 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80671-2