TAI-PRM: trustworthy AI—project risk management framework towards Industry 5.0
AI and Ethics - Trang 1-21 - 2024
Tóm tắt
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in manufacturing to automate tasks and process data, leading to what has been termed Industry. 4.0. However, as we move towards Industry 5.0, there is a need to incorporate societal and human-centric dimensions into the development and deployment of AI software artefacts. This requires blending ethical considerations with existing practices and standards. To address this need, the TAI-PRM framework has been developed. It builds upon established methods, such as Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and the Industrial ISO 31000, to manage risks associated with AI artefacts in the manufacturing sector. The framework identifies ethical considerations as hazards that can impact system processes and sustainability and provides tools and metrics to manage these risks. To validate the framework, it was applied in an EU project for Digital Twins on AI for manufacturing. The results showed that TAI-PRM can effectively identify and track different failure modes associated with AI artefacts and help users to manage ethical risks associated with their deployment. By incorporating ethical considerations into risk management processes, the framework enables the developing and deploying trustworthy AI in the manufacturing sector.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Accenture. Big success with big data—executive summary. 2012. https://www.accenture.com/us-en/%5C_acnmedia/accenture/conversion-assets/dotcom/documents/global/pdf/industries%5C_14/accenture-big-data-pov.pdf%7D. Accessed 18 Aug 2022
ASSISTANT. Assistant project – Learning and robust decision support sytem for agile manufacturing environnements. https://assistant-project.eu/. Accessed 04 Jun 2022
Bartneck, C., et al.: An introduction to ethics in robotics and AI. Springer Nature (2021)
Bednar, P.M., Welch, C.: Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Inform. Syst. Front. 22(2), 281–298 (2020)
Bedué, P., Fritzsche, A.: Can we trust AI? An empirical investigation of trust requirements and guide to successful AI adoption. J. Enterp. Inform. Manag. 35, 530–549 (2021)
Brosset, P., et al.: Scaling AI in manufacturing operations: a practitioners’ perspective, p. 10. Capgemini Research Institute (2019)
Čepin, M.: Reliability block diagram. In: Assessment of power system reliability, pp. 119–123. Springer (2011)
Cloos, C.: The Utilibot project: an autonomous mobile robot based on utilitarianism. In: 2005 AAAI fall symposium on machine ethics. pp. 38–45 (2005)
European Commission. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council; Laying Down Harmonised Rurles on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206&from=EN. Accessed 10 Jun 2022
Devitt, S. K. et al.: Trust and safety. In: Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2104.06512. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06512 (visited on 02/23/2022) (2021)
Dignum, V.: Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Designing AI for Human Values”. In: (Sept. 25, 2017). http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/2181 visited on 14 Feb 2022
Dignum, V.: Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Springer Nature (2019)
Dignum, V. et al.: Design for Values for Social Robot Architectures. In: Robophilosophy/TRANSOR, pp 43–52 (2018)
Duckworth, H.A., Moore, R.A.: Social responsibility: failure mode effects and analysis. CRC Press (2010)
Eitel-Porter, R.: Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI. AI Ethics 1, 73–80 (2021)
European Commission.: Directorate General for Communications Net- works, Content and Technology and High Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. LU: Publications Office, 2019. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/346720 visited on 26 Oct 2021
Finance ATCC: Industry 4.0 Challenges and solutions for the digital transformation and use of exponential technologies”. In: Finance, Audit Tax Consulting Corporate: Zurich, Swiss (2015), pp. 1–12
FMEA Corner: Functional Block Diagrams. https://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue183/%20fmeacorner183.htm accessed 25 Jun 2022
Fujimaki, R.: The 6 Challenges of Implementing AI in Manufacturing. 2020. https://www.americanmachinist.com/enterprise-data/%20article/21149328/the-6-challenges-of-implementing-ai-in-manufacturing-dotdata. Accessed 18 Aug 2022
Global, U.N.I.: 10 Principles for Ethical AI. http://www.thefutureworldofwork.org/opinions/10-principles-for-ethical-ai/. Accessed 10 Jun 2022
Hagendorff, T.: The ethics of AI ethics: an evaluation of guidelines. Minds Mach 30(1), 99–120 (2020)
Hopkin, P.: Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers (2018)
IEEE.: IEEE Global A/IS Ethics Initiative Newsletter. https://ieeeforms.wufoo.com/forms/r54n5um1cu3h0f/. Accessed 10 Jun 2022
IEEE. IEEE SA—7000-2021. 2021. https://www.techstreet.com/ieee/%20standards/ieee-7000-2021?product%5C_id=2109271–2021%7D. Accessed 10 Jun 2022
ISO. ISO 23247-1:2021. 2021. url: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/%20isoorg/%20contents/data/standard/07/50/75066.html. Accessed 21 Jul 2022
ISO.: ISO 31000—Risk management. 2018. https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html%7D. Accessed 26 Jun 2022
ISO.: ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020. 2020. https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/%20en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/07/76/77608.html. Accessed 03 Jun 2022
Joshi, G., Walambe, R., Kotecha, K.: A review on explainability in multimodal deep neural nets. IEEE Access 9, 59800–59821 (2021)
Knight, J.: Fundamentals of dependable computing for software engineers. CRC Press (2012)
Koulu, R.: Human control over automation: EU policy and AI ethics. Eur. J. Legal Stud. 12, 9 (2020)
Kumar, R.S.S. et al.: Failure modes in machine learning systems. In: arXiv preprint https://arXiv.org/1911.11034 (2019)
Kumpulainen, S., Terziyan, V.: Artificial general intelligence vs industry 4.0: do they need each other? Procedia Comput Sci 200, 140–150 (2022)
Lauer, D.: You cannot have AI ethics without ethics. AI Ethics 1(1), 21–25 (2021)
Laux, J., Wachter, S., Mitteslstadt, B.: Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: on the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk. In: Social Science Research Network, p. 35 (2023)
Learning, The Institute for Ethical Ai Machine. The Institute for Ethical AI & Machine Learning. 2021. https://ethical.institute. Accessed 10 Jun 2022
Li, J., Chignell, M.: FMEA-AI: AI fairness impact assessment using failure mode and effects analysis. AI Ethics, pp. 1– 14 (2022)
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., Kotsiantis, S.: Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy 23(1), 18 (2020)
Lu, Y. et al.: Standards for smart manufacturing: a review. In: 2019 IEEE 15th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE. pp. 73–78 (2019)
Microsoft.: Microsoft - HAX toolkit. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/haxtoolkit/. Accessed 10 Jun 2022
Ni, H., Chen, A., Chen, N.: Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Saf. Sci.. Sci. 48(10), 1269–1278 (2010)
Novelli, C., et al.: Taking AI risks seriously: a new assessment model for the AI Act. AI Soc. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01723-z
Oliveira, U.R., et al.: The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management. J. Clean. Prod. 151, 616–633 (2017)
Palacios Guillem. M.: New methodology developed for the integration of lean manufacturing; Kaizen and ISO 31000: 2009 Based on ISO 9001:2015. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2019. 080238.12–43. https://www.3ciencias.com/articulos/articulo/nueva-%20metodologia-desarrollada-para-la-integracion-de- lean-%20manufacturing- kaizen- e- iso- 310002009- basados-en-la-iso-%2090012015/%7D. Accessed 18 Jul 2022
Pieters, W.: Explanation and trust: what to tell the user in security and AI? Ethics Inform. Technol. 13(1), 53–64 (2011)
Quinn, T.P., et al.: Trust and medical AI: the challenges we face and the expertise needed to overcome them. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 28(4), 890–894 (2021)
Samoili, S. et al.: AI WATCH. Defining artificial intelligence. JRC Publications Repository. 2020. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC118163. Accessed 15 Aug 2022
Scannell, T., Curkovic, S., Wagner, B., et al.: Integration of ISO 31000: 2009 and supply chain risk management. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag.Manag. 3(04), 367 (2013)
Shickel, S., Rashidi, P.: Sequential interpretability: methods, applications, and future direction for understanding deep learning models in the context of sequential data. arXiv preprint http://arXiv.org/2004.12524 (2020)
Speer, J.: Why FMEA is Not ISO 14971 Risk Management. 2016. https://www.greenlight.guru/blog/fmea-is-not-iso-14971-risk-management. Access 18 Jul 2022
Tubella, A.A. et al.: Governance by glass-box: implementing transparent moral bounds for AI behaviour”. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04994 (2019)
Vyhmeister, E., Gonzalez-Castane, G., Östbergy, P.-O.: Risk as a driver for AI framework development on manufacturing. AI Ethics, pp 1–20 (2022)
Vyhmeister, E., et al.: A responsible AI framework: pipeline contextualisation. AI Ethics 3, 1–23 (2022)
Vyhmeister, E., et al.: Modelling and energy-based model predictive control of high pressure grinding roll. Miner. Eng. 134, 7–15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.01.016
Wang, G.: Humans in the loop: the design of interactive AI Systems. Stanford HAI. 2019. https://hai.stanford.edu/news/humans-loop-design-interactive-ai-systems. Accessed 17 Jun 2022
Widiasih, W., Karningsih, P.D., Ciptomulyono, U.: Development of integrated model for managing risk in lean manufacturing implementation: a case study in an Indonesian manufacturing company. Procedia Manuf. 4, 282–290 (2015)
Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., Li, L.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56(8), 2941–2962 (2018)
Xu, X., et al.: Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. J. Manuf. Syst. 61, 530–535 (2021)
Zheng, T., et al.: The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59(6), 1922–1954 (2021)