Model updating of Masonry courtyard walls of the historical Isabey mosque using ambient vibration measurements

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring - Tập 12 - Trang 1157-1172 - 2022
Ozgur Ozcelik1, Ibrahim Serkan Misir1, Umut Yucel2, Erkan Durmazgezer3, Gokhan Yucel4, Carmen Amaddeo5
1Civil Engineering Department, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
2Civil Engineering Department, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevsehir, Turkey
3Department of Construction Technology, Izmir Kavram Vocational School, Izmir, Turkey
4Civil Engineering Department, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey
5Department of Building Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Growing interest in the preservation of architectural heritage has revealed a need for tools that are capable to reliably analyze masonry structures. For decades, finite element modeling approach has been commonly used in engineering society to simulate these structures under different conditions; but most of the time, the responses obtained from experiments differ from those of simulations due to the complexity in inherent physical aspects such as material properties, boundary conditions, mass and/or stiffness uncertainties. From this perspective, model updating techniques have the potential to overcome these inaccuracies and become essential tools in developing verified finite element models compatible with experiments. In this paper, sensitivity-based finite element model updating studies of the courtyard walls of the historical Isabey Mosque located in Selcuk/Izmir are presented. Dynamic characteristics of the structure are estimated from two sets of ambient vibration measurements by the EFDD operational modal analysis technique. The initial numerical model of the courtyard walls is constituted by macro modeling strategy. In order to obtain a much better correlation with in situ tests, the uncertain parameters such as mass density, Young’s modulus, and boundary conditions of the initial numerical model are updated. Thus, a reliable finite element model that is more representative than the initial one is obtained to be used in future numerical assessment studies. In the presented paper, it is highlighted that the boundary conditions are often the most uncertain parts of a structural system, so they should be included in the updating process for realistic updating results.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Friswell M, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht Atamturktur S, Laman JA (2012) Finite element model correlation and calibration of historic masonry monuments: review. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 21:96–113 Ramos LF, Marques L, Lourenço PB, De Roeck G, Campos-Costa A, Roque J (2010) Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(5):1291–1305 Foti D, Diaferio M, Giannoccaro NI, Mongelli M (2012) Ambient vibration testing, dynamic identification and model updating of a historic tower. NDT E Int 47:88–95 Bartoli G, Betti M, Giordano S (2013) In situ static and dynamic investigations on the Torre Grossa masonry tower. Eng Struct 52:718–733 Russo S (2013) Testing and modelling of dynamic out-of-plane behaviour of the historic masonry façade of Palazzo Ducale in Venice. Italy Eng Struct 46:130–139 Sánchez-Aparicio LJ, Riveiro B, González-Aguilera D, Ramos LF (2014) The combination of geomatic approaches and operational modal analysis to improve calibration of finite element models: a case of study in Saint Torcato Church (Guimarães, Portugal). Constr Build Mater 70:118–129 Costa C, Arêde A, Costa A, Caetano E, Cunha A, Magalhaes F (2015) Updating numerical models of masonry arch bridges by operational modal analysis. Int J Archit Herit 9(7):760–774 Gentile C, Saisi A, Cabboi A (2015) Structural identification of a masonry tower based on operational modal analysis. Int J Archit Herit 9(2):98–110 Costa C, Ribeiro D, Jorge P, Silva R, Arêde A, Calçada R (2016) Calibration of the numerical model of a stone masonry railway bridge based on experimentally identified modal parameters. Eng Struct 123:354–371 Conde B, Ramos LF, Oliveira DV, Riveiro B, Solla M (2017) Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: application to Vilanova bridge. Eng Struct 148:621–638 Cabboi A, Gentile C, Saisi A (2017) From continuous vibration monitoring to FEM-based damage assessment: application on a stone-masonry tower. Constr Build Mater 156:252–265 Compán V, Pachón P, Cámara M, Lourenço PB, Sáez A (2017) Structural safety assessment of geometrically complex masonry vaults by non-linear analysis. The Chapel of the Würzburg Residence (Germany)”. Eng Struct 140:1–13 Torres W, Almazán JL, Sandoval C, Boroschek R (2017) Operational modal analysis and FE model updating of the Metropolitan Cathedral of Santiago, Chile. Eng Struct 143:169–188 Bassoli E, Vincenzi L, D’Altri AM, de Miranda S, Forghieri M, Castellazzi G (2018) Ambient vibration-based finite element model updating of an earthquake-damaged masonry tower. Struct Control Health Monit 25(5):1–15 Ercan E (2018) Assessing the impact of retrofitting on structural safety in historical buildings via ambient vibration tests. Constr Build Mater 164:337–349 Misir IS, Yucel G, Kuran F, Eser CB, Aldemir O, Topcu S (2022) Experimental out-of-plane damage limits of historical stone masonry walls. Constr Build Mater 333:127098 Dizhur D, Ingham J, Moon L, Griffith M, Schultz A, Senaldi I, Magenes G, Dickie J, Lissel S, Centeno J, Ventura C, Leite J, Lourenco PB (2011) Performance of masonry buildings and churches in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 44(4):279–296 Dizhur D, Ingham J (2015) Seismic improvement of loadbearing unreinforced masonry cavity walls. BRANZ Ismail N, Griffith M, Ingham JM (2011) Performance of masonry buildings during the 2010 Darfield (New Zealand) Earthquake. In: Proceedings 11th North American masonry conference, Masonry Society and Related Masonry Industry Organizations, Minneapolis, pp 1–13 Augenti N, Parisi F (2010) Learning from construction failures due to the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake. J Perform Constr Facil 24(6):536–555 MATLAB (2017) The MathWorks Inc., Natick ARTeMIS Extractor Pro (2016) Structural Vibration Solutions, Aalborg Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2001) Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Mater Struct 10(3):441–445 Allemang RJ (2003) The modal assurance criterion—twenty years of use and abuse. Sound Vib 37(8):14–21 Lourenço PB (1996) Computational strategies for masonry structures. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University Press Sacco E, Addessi D, Sab K (2018) New trends in mechanics of masonry. Meccanica 53(7):1565–1569 Teughels A (2003) Inverse modelling of civil engineering structures based on operational modal data. Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven. Teughels A, De Roeck G (2004) Structural damage identification of the highway bridge Z24 by FE model updating. J Sound Vib 278(3):589–610 ABAQUS (2017) Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Jonhston Ramos LF, Costa AC, Lourenço PB (2005) Operational modal analysis for damage detection of a masonry construction. In: Proceedings 1st international operational modal analysis conference. Aalborg University, Copenhagen, pp 495–502 Mouyiannou A, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2014) Identification of suitable limit states from nonlinear dynamic analyses of masonry structures. J Earthq Eng 18(2):231–263 Ceravolo R, Pistone G, Fragonara LZ, Massetto S, Abbiati G (2016) Vibration-based monitoring and diagnosis of cultural heritage: a methodological discussion in three examples. Int J Archit Herit 10(4):375–395 ASTM International (2004) Standard test method for in situ measurement of masonry deformability properties using the flatjack method. ASTM C1197-04 RILEM (2004) RILEM MDT.D.5 – In-situ stress-strain behavior tests based on the flat jack. RILEM TC 177-MDT: masonry durability and on-site testing. Mater Struct 37:497–501 Mottershead JE, Link M, Friswell MI (2011) The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(7):2275–2296 Moaveni B, Stavridis A, Lombaert G, Conte JP, Shing PB (2013) Finite-element model updating for assessment of progressive damage in a 3-story infilled RC Frame. J Struct Eng 139(10):1665–1674 Simoen E, De Roeck G, Lombaert G (2015) Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: a review. Mech Syst Signal Process 56:123–149 FEMtools (2017a) Dynamic Design Solutions, Leuven, Belgium FEMtools (2017b) FEMtools model updating theoretical manual, version 4.0.0. Dynamic Design Solutions, Leuven