Estimation of Stroke Volume and Aortic Valve Area in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: A Comparison of Echocardiography versus Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baumgartner, 2017, Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 30, 372, 10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009
Baumgartner, 2017, 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Eur Heart J, 38, 2739, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391
Lancellotti, 2012, Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification, J Am Coll Cardiol, 59, 235, 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.072
Otto, 1986, Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography, J Am Coll Cardiol, 7, 509, 10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80460-0
Hahn, 2017, Accurate measurement of left ventricular outflow tract diameter: comment on the updated recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 30, 1038, 10.1016/j.echo.2017.06.002
Chin, 2014, Echocardiography underestimates stroke volume and aortic valve area: implications for patients with small-area low-gradient aortic stenosis, Can J Cardiol, 30, 1064, 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.04.021
Maes, 2017, Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 19, 37, 10.1186/s12968-017-0344-8
Stahli, 2017, Impact of stroke volume assessment by integrating multi-detector computed tomography and Doppler data on the classification of aortic stenosis, Int J Cardiol, 246, 80, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.112
LaBounty, 2014, Annulus instead of LVOT diameter improves agreement between echocardiography effective orifice area and invasive aortic valve area, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 7, 1065, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.03.021
Garcia, 2011, Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic doppler echocardiography for the estimation of valve effective orifice area in patients with aortic stenosis, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 13, 25, 10.1186/1532-429X-13-25
Barone-Rochette, 2013, Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac MRI: comparison between high and low gradient, and normal and low flow aortic stenosis, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 6, 1009, 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000515
Burwash, 1993, Echocardiographic volume flow and stenosis severity measures with changing flow rate in aortic stenosis, Am J Physiol, 265, H1734
Otto, 1988, Experimental validation of Doppler echocardiographic measurement of volume flow through the stenotic aortic valve, Circulation, 78, 435, 10.1161/01.CIR.78.2.435
Lewis, 1984, Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical winidow, Circulation, 70, 425, 10.1161/01.CIR.70.3.425
Mitchell, 2019, Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 32, 1, 10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004
Capoulade, 2015, Impact of plasma Lp-PLA2 activity on the progression of aortic stenosis: the PROGRESSA study, J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 8, 26, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.09.016
Lang, 2015, Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 28, 1, 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
Pennell, 2002, Ventricular volume and mass by CMR, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 4, 507, 10.1081/JCMR-120016389
Bland, 1986, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, 1, 307, 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
Caballero, 2017, Three-dimensional morphology of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on grading aortic stenosis severity, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 30, 28, 10.1016/j.echo.2016.10.006
Mehrotra, 2015, Differential left ventricular outflow tract remodeling and dynamics in aortic stenosis, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 28, 1259, 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018
Clavel, 2015, Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and doppler echocardiography, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 8, 248, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.009
Pibarot, 2016, Doppler echocardiographic quantitation of aortic valve stenosis: a science in constant evolution, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 29, 1019, 10.1016/j.echo.2016.08.015
Jander, 2018, Anatomic estimation of aortic stenosis severity vs “fusion” of data from computed tomography and Doppler echocardiography, Echocardiography, 35, 777, 10.1111/echo.13855
Garcia, 2006, What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area?, J Heart Valve Dis, 15, 601
Kamperidis, 2015, Low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: reclassification of severity by fusion of Doppler and computed tomographic data, Eur Heart J, 36, 2087, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv188
Arsalan, 2017, Effect of elliptical LV outflow tract geometry on classification of aortic stenosis in a multidisciplinary heart team setting, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 10, 1401, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.009
Andersson, 2016, Phase-contrast MRI volume flow—a comparison of breath held and navigator based acquisitions, BMC Med Imaging, 16, 26, 10.1186/s12880-016-0128-x
Kilner, 2007, Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 9, 723, 10.1080/10976640701465090
Hundley, 1995, Quantitation of cardiac output with velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging, Am J Cardiol, 75, 1250, 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80772-3
Polte, 2015, Mitral regurgitation quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a comparison of indirect quantification methods, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 31, 1223, 10.1007/s10554-015-0681-3
Le Ven, 2016, Cardiac morphology and function reference values derived from a large subset of healthy young Caucasian adults by magnetic resonance imaging, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 17, 981, 10.1093/ehjci/jev217
Garcia, 2011, Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of valve effective orifice area in patients with aortic stenosis, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 13, 25, 10.1186/1532-429X-13-25
Kilner, 2007, Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 9, 723, 10.1080/10976640701465090
Caruthers, 2003, Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography, Circulation, 108, 2236, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095268.47282.A1