A comment on the PCAST report: Skip the “match”/“non-match” stage

Forensic Science International - Tập 272 - Trang e7-e9 - 2017
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison1,2,3
1Independent Forensic Consultant, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2Adjunct Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
3Simons Foundation Visiting Fellow, Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2016 Berry, 1992, Statistical inference in crime investigations using deoxyribonucleic acid profiling, Appl. Stat., 41, 499, 10.2307/2348086 Evett, 1993, An illustration of efficient statistical methods for RFLP analysis in forensic science, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 52, 498 Aitken, 2004 Foreman, 2003, Interpreting DNA evidence: a review, Int. Stat. Rev., 71, 473, 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2003.tb00207.x Aitken, 2006, Statistics in forensic science. Part II. An aid to evaluation of evidence, Probl. Forensic Sci., 65, 68 Berry, 1991, Inferences using DNA profiling in forensic identification and paternity cases, Stat. Sci., 6, 175 Curran, 2000 Evett, 1991, Interpretation: a personal odyssey, 9 Kaye, 2011 Lindley, 1977, A problem in forensic science, Biometrika, 64, 207, 10.1093/biomet/64.2.207 Morrison, 2010, Forensic voice comparison Robertson, 1995, DNA evidence: wrong answers or wrong questions?, 145 Roeder, 1994, DNA fingerprinting: a review of the controversy, Stat. Sci., 9, 222 Rose, 2009, A response to the UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison, Int. J. Speech Lang. Law, 16, 139, 10.1558/ijsll.v16i1.139 Zadora, 2014