The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers

Research Policy - Tập 36 - Trang 1035-1051 - 2007
Claudia Gonzalez-Brambila1, Francisco M. Veloso2
1Department of Business Administration, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, Río Hondo 1, México 01000, DF, Mexico
2Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agrawal, A., Henderson, R., 2002. Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 48 (1), 44–60. Allison, 1980, Inequality and scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 10, 163, 10.1177/030631278001000203 Allison, 1974, Productivity differences among scientists: evidence for accumulative advantage, American Sociological Review, 39, 596, 10.2307/2094424 Allison, 1982, Cumulative advantage and inequality in science, American Sociological Review, 47, 615, 10.2307/2095162 Arora, A., Gambardella, A., 1998. The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research in Economics. Working Paper, April. Arora, 1998, Reputation and competence in publicly funded science, Annales d’Economie et de Statistiques, 49–50, 163, 10.2307/20076114 Arundel, 2001 Atlas de la Ciencia Mexicana, 2006. Accessed at http://www.amc.unam.mx/atlas.htm in January. Becker, 1962, Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis, The Journal of Political Economy, 70, 9, 10.1086/258724 Bernier, 1975, Measures of excellence of engineering and science departments: a chemical engineering example, Chemical Engineering Education, 194 Buchmueller, 1999, Graduate training and the early career productivity of PhD economists, Economics of Education Review, 14, 65, 10.1016/S0272-7757(98)00019-3 Cole, 1979, Age and scientific performance, The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 958, 10.1086/226868 Cole, 1984, The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publications of men and women scientists, Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2, 217 CONACYT, 2001 CONACYT, 2002 De la Peña, J.A. (Coordinador), 2003. Estado Actual y Prospectiva de la Ciencia en Mexico. Academia Mexicana de Ciencias. Diamond, 1986, The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists, Journal of Gerontology, 41, 520, 10.1093/geronj/41.4.520 Fox, 2006, Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: what is at issue and why, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 377, 10.1007/s10961-006-7209-x Fox, 2001, Careers of young scientists: preferences, prospects, and realities by gender and field, Social Studies of Science, 31, 109, 10.1177/030631201031001006 Hausman, 1984, Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship, Econometrica, 52, 909, 10.2307/1911191 Henderson, 1996, Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery, The RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 32, 10.2307/2555791 Institute of Scientific Information, 2003. National Citation Report for Mexico. Articles from ISI database years 1981–002 cited in the period 1981–002, Project 2487, April 18. Jones, B.F., 2005. Age and Great Invention. NBER Working Paper No. 11359. Lawrence, 2003, The politics of publication, Nature, 422, 259, 10.1038/422259a Levin, 1991, Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists, The American Economic Review, 81, 114 Long, 1992, Measures of sex difference in scientific productivity, Social Forces, 71, 159, 10.1093/sf/71.1.159 Maddala, G.S., 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, Econometric Society Monographs in Quantitative Economics. Cambridge University Press, 1983. Merton, 1968, The Matthew Effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered, Science, 159, 56, 10.1126/science.159.3810.56 Merton, 1973 Merton, 1988, The Matthew Effect in science. II. Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property, ISIS, 79, 606, 10.1086/354848 1993 OECD, 2002. Ad Hoc Working Group. Steering and Funding of Research Institutions. Governance of Science Systems: New Challenges. Detailed Outline of the Final Project Report, Paris. Schultz, 1963 Simonton, 1988, Age and outstanding achievement: what do we know after a century of research?, Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251, 10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.251 Stephan, 1996, The economics of science, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIV, 1199 Trajtenberg, 1990, A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations, The RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 172, 10.2307/2555502 Turner, L., Mairesse, J., 2003. Explaining individual productivity differences in scientific research productivity: how important are institutional and individual determinants? An econometric analysis of the publications of French CNRS physicists in condensed matter (1980–1997). Annales d’Economie et de Statistiques (special issue in honor of Zvi Griliches). Weiss, 1982, Output variability, academic labor contracts, and waiting times for promotion, Research in Labor Economics, 5, 157 Wooldridge, 2002 Xie, 1998, Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle, American Sociological Review, 63, 847, 10.2307/2657505 Zener, 1968 Zener, 1970, Statistical theories of success, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 66, 18, 10.1073/pnas.66.1.18 Zuckerman, 1973, Age, aging and age structure in science