Exhaustible Resources, Monopolistic Competition, and Endogenous Growth
Tóm tắt
One of the central analytical findings of the growth literature is that continuous growth is possible even in an economy with exhaustible resources. Based on this result, this paper addresses the question of whether different equilibrium trajectories which lead to a balanced growth path are possible within an endogenous growth model with incomplete competition. Although the Solow-Stiglitz condition is violated due to a monopolistic sector, we nevertheless demonstrate that steady growth in per capita consumption is possible under the condition that the rate of entry of new monopolists exceeds that of the average monopolist's decline in output. As a necessary but not sufficient condition for indeterminacies in a growing economy, this paper demonstrates that the partial production elasticity of capital must be smaller than that of the exhaustible resource.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1992), ‘A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction’, Econometrica 60(2), 323–351.
Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1992), ‘Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth’, Review of Economic Studies 59, 645–661.
Benhabib, J. and J. Gali (1995), ‘On Growth and Indeterminacy: Some Theory and Evidence’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 43, 163–211.
Benhabib, J. and R. Perli (1994), ‘Uniqueness and Indeterminacy: On the Dynamics of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Economic Theory 63, 113–142.
Chiarella, C. (1980), ‘Optimal Depletion of a Nonrenewable Resource when Technological Progress is Endogenous’, in M. C. Kemp and N. v. Long, eds., Exhaustible Resources, Optimality, and Trade, Amsterdam et al.: North Holland Publishing Company.
Duncan, T. and J. Fogarty (1984), Australia and Argentina on Parallel Paths, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.
Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Hotelling, H. (1931), ‘The Economics of Exhaustible Resources’, Journal of Political Economy 39, 137–185.
King, R. G., C. I. Plosser and S. T. Rebelo (1988), ‘Production, Growth and Business Cycles. 1. The Basic Neoclassic Model’, Journal of Monetary Economics 21, 194–232.
Pethig, R. (1979), ‘Intertemporale Allokation mit erschöpfbaren Ressourcen und endogenen Innovationen’, in H. Siebert, ed., Erschöpfbare Ressourcen, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Ramsey, F. P. (1928), ‘A Mathematical Theory of Saving’, Economic Journal 38(152), 543–559.
Rivera-Batiz, L. A. and P. M. Romer (1991), ‘Economic Integration and Economic Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 531–555.
Romer, P. M. (1990), ‘Endogenous Technological Change’, Journal of Political Economy 98(5), S71-S102.
Schou, P. (1996), ‘A Growth Model with Technological Progress and Non-renewable Resources’, University of Copenhagen, mimeo.
Solow, R. M. (1974), ‘Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources’, Review of Economic Studies 41(Symposium), 29–45.
Stiglitz, J. (1974), ‘Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths’,Review of Economic Studies 41(Symposium), 123–138.
Summers, R. and A. Heston (1993), ‘Penn World Trade Tables, Version 5.5’, available on diskette from the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA.
Suzuki, H. (1976), ‘On the Possibility of Steadily Growing Per Capita Consumption in an Economy with a Wasting and Non-Replenishable Resource’, Review of Economic Studies 43, 527–535.
Takayama, A. (1980), ‘Optimal Technical Progress with Exhaustible Resources’, in M. C. Kemp and N. v. Long, eds., Exhaustible Resources, Optimality, and Trade, Amsterdam et al.: North Holland Publishing Company.