Linking competition with Growth Dominance and production ecology

Forest Ecology and Management - Tập 414 - Trang 99-107 - 2018
Ezequiel Fernández-Tschieder1,2, Dan Binkley3
1Agricultural Experimental Station Delta del Paraná, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Río Paraná de la Palmas y Canal Laurentino Comas – 4ta, Sección de Islas CC 14, (2804) Campana, Buenos Aires, Argentina
2Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
3School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bendel, 1989, Comparison of skewness coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Gini coefficient as inequality measures within populations, Oecologia, 78, 394, 10.1007/BF00379115 Binkley, 2004, A hypothesis about the interaction of tree dominance and stand production through stand development, For. Ecol. Manage., 190, 265, 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.10.018 Binkley, 2015, Tree-level patterns of lodgepole pine growth and leaf area in yellowstone national park: explaining anomalous patterns of growth dominance within stands, Ecosystems, 18, 251, 10.1007/s10021-014-9823-z Binkley, 2006, Patterns of growth dominance in forests of the Rocky Mountains, USA, For. Ecol. Manage., 236, 193, 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.001 Binkley, 2003, Twenty years of stand development in pure and mixed stands of Eucalyptus saligna and nitrogen-fixing Facaltaria moluccana, For. Ecol. Manage., 182, 93, 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00028-8 Binkley, 2010, Explaining growth of individual trees: Light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil, For. Ecol. Manage., 259, 1704, 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.037 Binkley, 2004, Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests, For. Ecol. Manage., 193, 5, 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.019 Bradford, 2010, A new method for evaluating forest thinning: growth dominance in managed Pinus resinosa stands, Can. J. For. Res., 40, 843, 10.1139/X10-039 Campoe, 2013, Fertilization and irrigation effects on tree level aboveground net primary production, light interception and light use efficiency in a loblolly pine plantation, For. Ecol. Manage., 288, 43, 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.026 Campoe, 2012, Stand-level patterns of carbon fluxes and partitioning in a Eucalyptus grandis plantation across a gradient of productivity, in São Paulo State, Brazil, Tree Physiol., 32, 696, 10.1093/treephys/tps038 Campoe, 2013, Stem production, light absorption and light use efficiency between dominant and non-dominant trees of Eucalyptus grandis across a productivity gradient in Brazil, For. Ecol. Manage., 288, 14, 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.035 Castagneri, 2012, Temporal variability of size–growth relationships in a Norway spruce forest: the influences of stand structure, logging, and climate, Can. J. For. Res., 42, 550, 10.1139/x2012-007 Ceriani, 2012, The origins of the Gini index: extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini, J. Econ. Inequal., 10, 421, 10.1007/s10888-011-9188-x Cordonnier, 2015, The Gini index brings asymmetric competition to light, Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst., 17, 107, 10.1016/j.ppees.2015.01.001 Damgaard, 2000, Describing inequality in plant size or fecundity, Ecology, 81, 1139, 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1139:DIIPSO]2.0.CO;2 Doi, 2010, Does reverse growth dominance develop in old plantations of Eucalyptus saligna?, For. Ecol. Manage., 259, 1815, 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.031 Ducey, 2010, Simplified inference about dominance in forest stands, For. Ecol. Manage., 260, 1282, 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.008 Fernández, 2009, Testing Binkley’s hypothesis about the interaction of individual tree water use efficiency and growth efficiency with dominance patterns in open and close canopy stands, For. Ecol. Manage., 257, 1859, 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.012 Fernández, 2011, Why do Pinus species have different growth dominance patterns than Eucalyptus species? A hypothesis based on differential physiological plasticity, For. Ecol. Manage., 261, 1061, 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.028 Fernández Tschieder, 2012, Influence of growth dominance and individual tree growth efficiency on Pinus taeda stand growth. A contribution to the debate about why stands productivity declines, For. Ecol. Manage., 277, 116, 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.025 Ford, 1975, Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures, J. Ecol., 63, 311, 10.2307/2258857 Gini, 1912 Hara, 1993, Mode of competition and size-structure dynamics in plant communities, Plant Species Biol., 8, 75, 10.1111/j.1442-1984.1993.tb00059.x Kashian, 2005, Variability and convergence in stand structural development on a fire-dominated subalpine landscape, Ecology, 86, 643, 10.1890/03-0828 Keyser, 2012, Patterns of growth dominance in thinned yellow-poplar stands in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA, Can. J. For. Res., 42, 406, 10.1139/x11-196 Landsberg, 1997, A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts ofradiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partltlonlng, For. Ecol. Manage., 95, 209, 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00026-1 Lorenz, 1905, Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth, Publ. Am. Stat. Assoc., 9, 209 Metsaranta, 2010, Patterns of inter-annual variation in the size asymmetry of growth in Pinus banksiana, Oecologia, 163, 737, 10.1007/s00442-009-1559-7 Monteith, 1977, Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain [and Discussion], Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 281, 277, 10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 Pommerening, 2016, Are long-term changes in plant species composition related to asymmetric growth dominance in the pristine Białowieża Forest?, Basic Appl. Ecol., 17, 408, 10.1016/j.baae.2016.02.002 Pothier, 2017, Relationships between patterns of stand growth dominance and tree competition mode for species of various shade tolerances, For. Ecol. Manage., 406, 155, 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.066 Pretzsch, 2010, Size-symmetric versus size-asymmetric competition and growth partitioning among trees in forest stands along an ecological gradient in central Europe, Can. J. For. Res., 40, 370, 10.1139/X09-195 R Core Team, 2017 Ryan, 1997, Age-related decline in forest productivity: pattern and process, Adv. Ecol. Res., 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60009-4 Schwinning, 1998, Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants, Oecologia, 113, 447, 10.1007/s004420050397 Stoll, 1994, Growth Variation in a Naturally Established Population of Pinus Sylvestris, Ecology, 75, 660, 10.2307/1941724 Weiner, 1990, Asymmetric competition in plant populations, Trends Ecol. Evol., 5, 360, 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90095-U Weiner, 2006, Size-asymmetric competition and size-asymmetric growth in a spatially explicit zone-of-influence model of plant competition, Ecol. Res., 21, 707, 10.1007/s11284-006-0178-6 Weiner, 1984, The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations, Oecologia, 61, 334, 10.1007/BF00379630 Weiner, 1986, Size variability and competition in plant monocultures, Oikos, 47, 211, 10.2307/3566048 West, 2014, Calculation of a growth dominance statistic for forest stands, For. Sci., 60, 1021, 10.5849/forsci.13-186 Westoby, 1982, Frequency distributions of plant size during competitive growth of stands: the operation of distribution-modifying functions, Ann. Bot., 50, 733, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086416 Zeileis, A., 2014. ineq: Measuring Inequality, Concentration, and Poverty. R package version 0.2-13.