Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs
Tài liệu tham khảo
1984
1985
Willman AJ. Development of an evaluation procedure for building energy design tools. In: Proceedings of building energy simulation ’85, 1985. p. 302–7.
Lawrie, L, Klock W, Levernz D. Evaluation of microcomputer energy analysis programs. Technical report E-193. US Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, July 1984.
Jorgensen O. Analysis model survey, December 1983, report T.VIII.B.1.1983, IEA SHC Task 8 passive and hybrid solar low energy buildings. Lyngby: Thermal Insulation Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark; 1983.
Rittelmann PR, Faruq Admed S. Design tool survey. IEA SHC Task 8 passive and hybrid solar low energy buildings, Subtask C design methods. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; May 1985.
Matsuo Y. Survey of simulation technology in Japan and Asia, In: Proceedings of building energy simulation ’85, 1985. p. 23–30.
Degelman, 1986
Wiltshire J, Wright A. The documentation and evaluation of building simulation models. BEPAC Technical note 89/2. Garston: Building Research Establishment, 1989.
Wiltshire J, Wright A. The evaluation of the simulation models ESP, HTB2 and SERI-RES for the UK Passive Solar Program, report for Energy Technology Support Unit. Department of Energy, London, 1987.
Corson GC. A comparative evaluation of commercial building energy simulation software. Gale G. Corson Engineering. Portland: Bonneville Power Administration; 1990.
Ahmad Q, Szokolay S. Thermal Design tools in Australia: a comparative study of TEMPER, CHEETAH, ARCHIPAK and QUICK. In: Proceedings of building simulation ’99, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, IBPSA, August 1993. p. 351–7.
Amistadi H. Energy analysis software review. In: Engineered systems, October 1993.
Amistadi H. CAD-Building load software review. In: Engineered systems, June 1995. p. 50–67.
Kenny P, Lewis JO, editors. Tools and techniques for the design and evaluation of energy efficient buildings. European Commission DG XVII Thermie Action no. B 184. Dublin: Energy Research Group, University College Dublin; 1995.
Lighting Design and Application. 1996 IESNA Lighting Design Software Survey. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, September 1996. p. 39–47.
Lomas K, Eppel H, Martin C, Bloomfield D. Empirical validation of thermal building simulation programs using test room data, vol. 1: final report. Leicester: De Montfort University; 1994.
Crawley D, editor. Building energy tools directory, Office of Building Technology, State and Community Programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; June 1996.
Aizlewood ME, Littlefair PJ. Daylight prediction methods: a survey of their use. In: CIBSE National Lighting Conference Papers, Bath, London: Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers; 1996. p. 126–40.
Khemani M. Energy audit software directory. M. Khemani and Associates, Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada; September 1997.
Underwood C. A comparative assessment of two HVAC plant modelling programs. In: Proceedings of building simulation ’97, vol. 1, Prague, Czech Republic, IBPSA, 1997. p. 385–92.
Zmeureanu R. Defining the methodology for the next-generation HOT2000 simulator, Task 3 report. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada; February 1998.
Haltrecht D, Zmeureanu R, Beausoleil-Morrison I. Defining the methodology for the next-generation HOT2000 simulator. In: Proceedings of building simulation ’99, vol. 1, Kyoto, Japan, IBPSA, September 1999. p. 61–8.
de Boer J., Hans E. Survey simple design tools. IEA SHC Task 21, Subtask C4 simple design tools. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik; May 1999.
Waltz, 2000
Jacobs P, Henderson H. State-of-the-art review of whole building, building envelope, and HVAC component and system simulation and design tools. Final report ARTI-21CR/30010-01, Arlington: Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute; February 2002.
Crawley, 2005