In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria
Tóm tắt
The in vivo antimicrobial activity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) on the salivary flora up to 7 h after its application, using epifluorescence microscopy with the SYTO 9/propidium iodide dual staining, was evaluated. Fifteen volunteers performed a single mouthrinse with sterile water (SM-water), a single mouthrinse with 0.12% CHX (0.12% SM-CHX) and a single and double mouthrinse with 0.2% CHX (0.2% SM-CHX and 0.2% DM-CHX). Samples of saliva were taken at 30 s, and 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after each application. In comparison with SM-water, 0.2% CHX (SM and DM) showed a significant antibacterial effect up to 7 h after the mouthrinse, whereas this effect only persisted up to 5 h after the 0.12% SM-CHX mouthrinse. On comparing the two concentrations of CHX, significantly higher percentages of bacterial vitality were observed in all the saliva samples after the use of 0.12% CHX than after 0.2% CHX. On comparison of the 0.2% SM-CHX and 0.2% DM-CHX, significantly higher percentages of live bacteria were observed in the saliva samples taken at 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after the single mouthrinse compared with the double mouthrinse. The 0.2% CHX mouthrinse had the greatest antimicrobial activity on the salivary flora up to 7 h after its application, with a progressive recovery in bacterial vitality. The differences observed with respect to the 0.12% CHX mouthrinse demonstrate the influence of the concentration on its immediate antimicrobial activity and substantivity.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Manau Navarro C, Guasch Serra S (2003) Métodos de control de la placa bacteriana. In: Cuenca Sala E, Manau Navarro C, Serra Majem L (eds) Odontología preventiva y comunitaria: principios, métodos y aplicaciones, 2nd edn. Masson, Barcelona, p 79
Moran J, Addy M, Wade WG et al (1992) A comparison of delmopinol and chlorhexidine on plaque regrowth over a 4-day period and salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol 19:749–753
Jenkins S, Addy M, Wade W, Newcombe RG (1994) The magnitude and duration of the effects of some mouthrinse products on salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol 21:397–401
Elworthy A, Greenman J, Doherty FM, Newcombe RG, Addy M (1996) The substantivity of a number of oral hygiene products determined by the duration of effects on salivary bacteria. J Periodontol 67:572–576
Balbuena L, Stambaugh KI, Ramirez SG, Yeager C (1998) Effects of topical oral antiseptic rinses on bacterial counts of saliva in healthy human subjects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:625–629
Addy M, Moran J (1997) Evaluation of oral hygiene products: science is true; don't be misled by the facts. Periodontol 2000 15:40–51
Sekino S, Ramberg P, Uzel NG, Socransky S, Lindhe J (2003) Effect of various chlorhexidine regimens on salivary bacteria and de novo plaque formation. J Clin Periodontol 30:919–925
Roberts WR, Addy M (1981) Comparison of in vitro and in vivo antibacterial properties of antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine, alexidine. CPC and hexetidine. Relevance to mode of action. J Clin Periodontol 8:295–310
Addy M, Jenkins S, Newcombe R (1989) Toothpastes containing 0.3% and 0.5% triclosan. II. Effects of single brushings on salivary bacterial counts. Am J Dent 2:215–219
Jenkins S, Addy M, Newcombe R (1990) The effects of 0.5% chlorhexidine and 0.2% triclosan containing toothpastes on salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol 17:85–89
Schiott CR, Loe H, Jensen SB, Kilian M, Davies RM, Glavind K (1970) The effect of chlorhexidine mouthrinses on the human oral flora. J Clin Periodontol 5:84–89
Addy M, Jenkins S, Newcombe R (1991) The effect of some chlorhexidine-containing mouthrinses on salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol 18:90–93
Harper PR, Milsom S, Wade W, Addy M, Moran J, Newcombe RG (1995) An approach to efficacy screening of mouthrinses: studies on a group of French products (II). Inhibition of salivary bacteria and plaque in vivo. J Clin Periodontol 22:723–727
Tomás I, Cousido MC, Tomás M, Limeres J, García-Caballero L, Diz P (2008) In vivo bactericidal effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine but not 0.12% on salivary obligate anaerobes. Arch Oral Biol 53:1186–1191
Weiger R, Netuschil L, Wester-Ebbinghaus T, Brecx M (1998) An approach to differentiate between antibacterial and antiadhesive effects of mouthrinses in vivo. Arch Oral Biol 43:559–565
Caballero LG, Carmona IT, Gónzalez MC, Posse JL, Taboada JL, Dios PD (2009) Evaluation of the substantivity in saliva of different forms of application of chlorhexidine. Quintessence Int 40:141–144
World Health Organisation (1997) Oral health surveys, basic methods, 4th edn. WHO, Geneva
Navazesh M, Christensen CM (1982) A comparison of whole mouth resting and stimulated salivary measurement procedures. J Dent Res 61:1158–1162
Tomás Carmona I, García-Caballero L, Cousido M, Limeres J, Álvarez M, Diz P (2009) Evaluation of chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora by epifluorescence microscopy. Oral Dis, 2009 Apr 21 [Epub ahead of print].
Pitten FA, Kramer A (1999) Antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic mouthrinse solutions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 55:95–100
Herrera D, Roldan S, Santacruz I, Santos S, Masdevall M, Sanz M (2003) Differences in antimicrobial activity of four commercial 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary bacterial counts study. J Clin Periodontol 30:307–314
Jenkins S, Addy M, Newcombe R (1990) The effect of triclosan, stannous fluoride and chlorhexidine products on: (II) Salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol 17:698–701
Buckner RY, Kayrouz GA, Briner WW (1994) Reduction of oral microbes by a single chlorhexidine rinse. Compendium 15:512–520
Briner WW, Kayrouz GA, Chanak MX (1994) Comparative antimicrobial effectiveness of a substantive (0.12% chlorhexidine) and a nonsubstantive (phenolic) mouthrinse in vivo and in vitro. Compendium 15:1158–1170
Fernandes-Naglik L, Downes J, Shirlaw P et al (2001) The clinical and microbiological effects of a novel acidified sodium chlorite mouthrinse on oral bacterial mucosal infections. Oral Dis 7:276–280
Jenkins S, Addy M, Newcombe R (1991) Triclosan and sodium lauryl sulphate mouthwashes (I). Effects on salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol 18:140–144
Reynolds S, Moran J, Addy M, Wade WG, Newcombe R (1991) Taurolin as an oral rinse. I. Antimicrobial effects in vitro and in vivo. Clin Prev Dent 13:13–17
Simonsson T, Hvid EB, Rundegren J, Edwardsson S (1991) Effect of delmopinol on in vitro dental plaque formation, bacterial acid production and the number of microorganisms in saliva. Oral Microbiol Immunol 6:305–309
Moran J, Addy M, Wade W, Milson S, McAndrew R, Newcombe RG (1995) The effect of oxidising mouthrinses compared with chlorhexidine on salivary bacterial counts and plaque regrowth. J Clin Periodontol 22:750–755
Milstone AM, Passaretti CL, Perl TM (2008) Chlorhexidine: expanding the armamentarium for infection control and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 46:274–281
Sreenivasan PK, Gittins E (2004) Effects of low dose chlorhexidine mouthrinses on oral bacteria and salivary microflora including those producing hydrogen sulfide. Oral Microbiol Immunol 19:309–313
Dahlen G (1984) Effect of antimicrobial mouthrinses on salivary microflora in healthy subjects. Scand J Dent Res 92:38–42
Addy M, Wright R (1978) Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial properties of povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinses. J Clin Periodontol 5:198–205
Yates R, Moran J, Addy M, Mullan PJ, Wade WG, Newcombe R (1997) The comparative effect of acidified sodium chlorite and chlorhexidine mouthrinses on plaque regrowth and salivary bacterial counts. J Clin Periodontol 24:603–609
Toljanic JA, Hagen JC, Takahashi Y, Shapiro RD (1992) Evaluation of the substantivity of a chlorhexidine oral rinse in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:1055–1059