“It’s changed my life not to have the continual worry of being warm” – health and wellbeing impacts of a local fuel poverty programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
Tóm tắt
Living in a cold home and being fuel poor can contribute to adverse physical and mental health. Energy efficiency interventions are considered the simplest ways of tackling fuel poverty and preventing associated negative health, wellbeing, and socio-economic consequences. The overall aim of the current study was to provide a greater understanding of the impact of a locally administered programme, which funded the installation of major heating/insulation measures in areas of high fuel poverty, on the health and wellbeing of beneficiaries of the programme. A mixed-methods approach to explore the health and wellbeing impacts of a fuel poverty programme in East Sussex that took place between October 2016 and March 2018. Beneficiaries completed the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale before and after any heating/insulation work had been completed in their home. Beneficiaries were also asked to retrospectively rate their health pre- and post-installation. Interviews with 23 beneficiaries of the programme were conducted to explore in-depth the impact of the programme on people’s health and wellbeing and the wider social determinants of health. A major heating/insulation measure was installed in 149 homes. The majority of measures installed were boilers (57.7%) and new central heating systems (32.2%). Self-rated health and wellbeing were significantly higher post-installation. Interviewees described clear examples of the positive impacts on physical health and wellbeing such as fewer chest infections, reduced pain, feeling less anxious and depressed, and generally feeling happier and more relaxed. Interviews also highlighted broader areas of impact such as reduced social isolation and increased use of domestic space. Many of the beneficiaries also reported a reduction in their energy bills since their new heating systems had been installed. The findings from the evaluation suggest that the installation of major heating or insulation measures such as new boilers have substantial benefits for the health and wellbeing of beneficiaries. The findings also suggest that the programme had a positive impact on wider determinants of health including reduction in stress and isolation that are likely to be part of the pathways between fuel poverty interventions and mental and physical health outcomes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bednar DJ, Reames TG. Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States. Nat Energy. 2020;5(6):1–8.
Oliveras L, Peralta A, Palència L, Gotsens M, López MJ, Artazcoz L, et al. Energy poverty and health: trends in the European Union before and during the economic crisis, 2007–2016. Health Place. 2020;67:102294.
Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy. Fuel poverty statistics. London: HM Government; 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fuel-poverty-statistics.
National Institute of Clinical Excellence. NICE guidelines NG6: excess winter deaths and morbidity and the health risks associated with cold homes. London: National Institute of Health and Care Excellence; 2015.
Butcher J. Fuel poverty how to improve health and wellbeing through action on affordable warmth. A guide to delivering action on fuel poverty for public health professionals, health and wellbeing boards, and local authorities in England. UK Health Forum. 2014;1(2):4.
Marmot M, Geddes I, Bloomer E, Allen J, Goldblatt P. The health impacts of cold homes and fuel poverty. London: Friends of the Earth & the Marmot Review Team 2011;201(1).
Hills J. Getting the measure of fuel poverty: final report of the fuel poverty review. London; 2012.
Liddell C, Guiney C. Living in a cold and damp home: frameworks for understanding impacts on mental well-being. Public Health. 2015;129(3):191–9.
Churchill SA, Smyth R, Farrell L. Fuel poverty and subjective wellbeing. Energy Econ. 2020;86:104650.
Thomson H, Snell C, Bouzarovski S. Health, well-being and energy poverty in Europe: a comparative study of 32 European countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(6):584.
Longhurst N, Hargreaves T. Emotions and fuel poverty: the lived experience of social housing tenants in the United Kingdom. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2019;56:101207.
Richardson G, Eick S. Is England's warm front programme going to improve the country's health? Indoor Built Environ. 2008;17(5):395–6.
Mahoney S, Stockton H. Making a house a home: providing affordable warmth solutions for children and families living in fuel poverty. London; 2015.
Grey C, Schmieder-Gaite T, Jiang S, Nascimento C, Poortinga W. Cold homes, fuel poverty and energy efficiency improvements: a longitudinal focus group approach. Indoor Built Environ. 2017;26(7):902–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X17703450.
Marmot M, Allen J, Boyce T, Goldblatt P, Morrison J. Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on. London: Institute of Health Equity; 2020.
Department of Energy and Climate Change. Cutting the cost of keeping warm – a fuel poverty strategy for England. London: HM Government; 2015.
Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy. Sustainable warmth: protecting vulnerable households in England. London: HM Government; 2021.
Thomson H, Thomas S, Sellstrom E, Petticrew M. Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(2):CD008657.
Maidment CD, Jones CR, Webb TL, Hathway EA, Gilbertson JM. The impact of household energy efficiency measures on health: a meta-analysis. Energy Policy. 2014;65:583–93.
Thomson H, Thomas S, Sellstrom E, Petticrew M. The health impacts of housing improvement: a systematic review of intervention studies from 1887 to 2007. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(S3):S681–S92.
Department for Business, energy, and industrial strategy. Sub-regional fuel poverty: 2019 data. London: UK Government; 2021.
Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):63.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
Poortinga W, Rodgers SE, Lyons RA, Anderson P, Tweed AC, Grey C, et al. The health impacts of energy performance investments in low-income areas: a mixed-methods approach. Public Health Res. 2018;6(5):1–82.
Fuller E, Mindell J, Prior G. Health survey for England 2016. London: NHS Digital; 2017.
Liddell C, Morris C. Fuel poverty and human health: a review of recent evidence. Energy Policy. 2010;38(6):2987–97.
Gilbertson J, Stevens M, Stiell B, Thorogood N. Home is where the hearth is: grant recipients' views of England's home energy efficiency scheme (warm front). Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(4):946–56.
Middlemiss L, Gillard R. Fuel poverty from the bottom-up: Characterising household energy vulnerability through the lived experience of the fuel poor. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2015;6:146–54.
Willand N, Ridley I, Maller C. Towards explaining the health impacts of residential energy efficiency interventions–a realist review. Part 1: pathways. Soc Sci Med. 2015;133:191–201.
Gilbertson J, Grimsley M, Green G, Group WFS. Psychosocial routes from housing investment to health: evidence from England's home energy efficiency scheme. Energy Policy. 2012;49:122–33.
Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2003;8(4):597–607.
Bennett E, Dayson C, Eadson W, Gilbertson J, Tod A. Warm safe and well: the evaluation of the warm at home Programme; 2016.
Sharpe RA, Williams AJ, Simpson B, Finnegan G, Jones T. A pilot study on the impact of a first-time central heating intervention on resident mental wellbeing. Indoor Built Environ. 2020;31(1):31–44.
Thomson H, Thomas S. Developing empirically supported theories of change for housing investment and health. Soc Sci Med. 2015;124:205–14.
Hodges N, Redgrove Z, Morris P, Simpson K, Asher M. Affordable warmth & health impact evaluation toolkit. Centre Sustain Energy. 2016.
Parry O, Bancroft A, Gnich W, Amos A. Nobody home? Issues of respondent recruitment in areas of deprivation. Crit Public Health. 2001;11(4):305–17.
Holt-Lunstad J, Robles TF, Sbarra DA. Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States. Am Psychol. 2017;72(6):517.
Department for Digital C, Media and Sport. A connected society - A strategy for tackling loneliness: laying the foundations for change. London; 2018.