A 17-gene Assay to Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness in the Context of Gleason Grade Heterogeneity, Tumor Multifocality, and Biopsy Undersampling

European Urology - Tập 66 - Trang 550-560 - 2014
Eric A. Klein1, Matthew R. Cooperberg2,3, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi4, Jeffry P. Simko2,5, Sara M. Falzarano4, Tara Maddala6, June M. Chan2,7, Jianbo Li6, Janet E. Cowan2, Athanasios C. Tsiatis6, Diana B. Cherbavaz6, Robert J. Pelham6, Imelda Tenggara-Hunter2, Frederick L. Baehner5,6, Dejan Knezevic6, Phillip G. Febbo6, Steven Shak6, Michael W. Kattan8, Mark Lee6, Peter R. Carroll2
1Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
2Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco and UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
4Robert J Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
5Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA USA
6Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA
7Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
8Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Strope, 2010, Prostate cancer screening: current status and future perspectives, Nat Rev Urol, 7, 487, 10.1038/nrurol.2010.120 Thompson, 2007, Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update, J Urol, 177, 2106, 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.003 Cooperberg, 2010, Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 28, 1117, 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.0133 Sanda, 2008, Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors, N Engl J Med, 358, 1250, 10.1056/NEJMoa074311 Moyer, 2012, Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement, Ann Intern Med, 157, 120, 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459 Qaseem, 2013, Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the clinical guidelines committee of the American College of Physicians, Ann Intern Med, 158, 761, 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00633 Cooperberg, 2011, Active surveillance for prostate cancer: progress and promise, J Clin Oncol, 29, 3669, 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.9738 Cooperberg, 2005, The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy, J Urol, 173, 1938, 10.1097/01.ju.0000158155.33890.e7 Stephenson, 2009, Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era, J Clin Oncol, 27, 4300, 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2501 Dong, 2008, Validation of pretreatment nomograms for predicting indolent prostate cancer: efficacy in contemporary urological practice, J Urol, 180, 150, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.053 Ploussard, 2011, The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 60, 291, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.006 King, 2000, Prostate biopsy grading errors: a sampling problem?, Int J Cancer, 90, 326, 10.1002/1097-0215(20001220)90:6<326::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-J Conti, 2009, Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer, J Urol, 181, 1628, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.107 Müntener, 2008, Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 53, 767, 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.016 Tomlins, 2007, Integrative molecular concept modeling of prostate cancer progression, Nat Genet, 39, 41, 10.1038/ng1935 Makarov, 2009, Biomarkers for prostate cancer, Annu Rev Med, 60, 139, 10.1146/annurev.med.60.042307.110714 Singh, 2002, Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior, Cancer Cell, 1, 203, 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00030-2 Cheville, 2008, Gene panel model predictive of outcome in men at high-risk of systemic progression and death from prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy, J Clin Oncol, 26, 3930, 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6752 Ding, 2011, SMAD4-dependent barrier constrains prostate cancer growth and metastatic progression, Nature, 470, 269, 10.1038/nature09677 Cuzick, 2012, Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort, Br J Cancer, 106, 1095, 10.1038/bjc.2012.39 Berger, 2011, The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer, Nature, 470, 214, 10.1038/nature09744 Squire, 2011, Prostate cancer as a model system for genetic diversity in tumors, Adv Cancer Res, 112, 183, 10.1016/B978-0-12-387688-1.00007-7 Gray, 2009, Weighted analyses for cohort sampling designs, Lifetime Data Anal, 15, 24, 10.1007/s10985-008-9095-z Chen, 1999, Case-cohort and case-control analysis with Cox's model, Biometrika, 86, 755, 10.1093/biomet/86.4.755 McShane, 2005, Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies, J Clin Oncol, 23, 9067, 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.0454 Cooperberg, 2011, Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 29, 228, 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.4252 Epstein, 2005, The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma, Am J Surg Pathol, 29, 1228, 10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1 Magi-Galluzzi, 2007, RNA yields and RT-PCR gene expression profiles obtained from manual-microdissected, fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue (FPET) from prostate adenocarcinomas, Mod Pathol, 20, 352A Magi-Galluzzi, 2010, RNA yields and RT-PCR gene expression profiles obtained from manual-microdissected fixed paraffin-embedded prostate cancer needle core biopsies, Mod Pathol, 23, 205A Knezevic, 2013, Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX prostate cancer assay – a clinical RT-PCR assay optimized for prostate needle biopsies, BMC Genomics, 14, 690, 10.1186/1471-2164-14-690 Cox, 1972, Regression models and life tables, J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol, 43, 187 Goldstein, 2008, Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features, J Clin Oncol, 26, 4063, 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4501 Storey, 2001 Cooperberg, 2009, Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis, J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, 878, 10.1093/jnci/djp122 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Prostate cancer, version 2.2013. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Web site. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#prostate. Vickers, 2006, Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models, Med Decis Making, 26, 565, 10.1177/0272989X06295361 Eggener, 2011, Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy, J Urol, 185, 869, 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.057 Hong, 2014, Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance, Eur Urol, 66, 214, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.001 Pencina, 2008, Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond, Stat Med, 27, 157, 10.1002/sim.2929 Vickers, 2009, Net reclassification improvement and decision theory, Stat Med, 28, 525, 10.1002/sim.3087 Gu, 2009, Estimating the capacity for improvement in risk prediction with a marker, Biostatistics, 10, 172, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn025 Wilt, 2012, Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 367, 203, 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162 Donin, 2013, Gleason 6 prostate tumors diagnosed in the PSA era do not demonstrate the capacity for metastatic spread at the time of radical prostatectomy, Urology, 82, 148, 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.054 Ganz, 2011, NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer, NIH Consens State Sci Statements, 28, 1 Reese, 2012, The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment, Cancer, 118, 6046, 10.1002/cncr.27670 Nam, 2010, Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, J Urol, 183, 963, 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.043 Fujita, 2009, Serial prostate biopsies are associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance, J Urol, 182, 2664, 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.044 Hayes, 2010, Active surveillance compared with initial treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer: a decision analysis, JAMA, 304, 2373, 10.1001/jama.2010.1720 Carter, 2012, Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer?, J Clin Oncol, 30, 4294, 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.0586 Esserman, 2013, Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement, JAMA, 310, 797, 10.1001/jama.2013.108415 Penney, 2011, mRNA expression signature of Gleason grade predicts lethal prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 29, 2391, 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.6421 Crager, 2010, Gene identification using true discovery rate degree of association sets and estimates corrected for regression to the mean, Stat Med, 29, 33, 10.1002/sim.3789