Testing and adjusting for publication bias

Coursol, 1986, Effect of positive findings on submission and acceptance rates: a note on meta-analysis bias, Prof. Psychol., 17, 136, 10.1037/0735-7028.17.2.136 Dickersin, 1993, Publication bias: the problem that won't go away, Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 703, 135, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x Sharp, 1990, What can and should be done to reduce publication bias? The perspective of an editor, JAMA, 263, 1390, 10.1001/jama.263.10.1390 Song, 2000, Publication and related biases, Health Technol. Assess., 4, 1, 10.3310/hta4100 Hedges, 1985 Rosenthal, 1991 Arnqvist, 1995, Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution, Trends Ecol. Evol., 10, 236, 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89073-4 Glass, 1976, Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research, Educat. Res., 5, 3, 10.3102/0013189X005010003 Boisen, 1979, Testicular size and shape of 47,XYY and 47,XXY men in a double-blind, double-matched population survey, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 31, 697 Song, 1998, Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis, Br. Med. J., 316, 471 Alatalo, 1997, Heritabilities and paradigm shifts, Nature, 385, 402, 10.1038/385402a0 Gontard-Danek, 1999, The strength of sexual selection: meta-analysis of bird studies, Behav. Ecol., 10, 476, 10.1093/beheco/10.5.476 Simmons, 1999, Fluctuating paradigm, Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci., 266, 593, 10.1098/rspb.1999.0677 Poulin, 2000, Manipulation of host behaviour by parasites: a weakening paradigm?, Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci., 267, 787, 10.1098/rspb.2000.1072 Csada, 1996, The ‘file drawer problem’ of non-significant results: does it apply to biological research?, Oikos, 76, 591, 10.2307/3546355 Palmer, 2000, Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 31, 441, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.441 Friedmann, 1997, A novel paradigm, Nature, 385, 480, 10.1038/385480b0 Kerr, 1977, Manuscript characteristics which influence acceptance for management and social science journals, Acad. Manage. J., 20, 132, 10.2307/255467 Mahoney, 1977, Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system, Cognit. Theor. Res., 1, 161, 10.1007/BF01173636 Ernst, 1994, Reviewer bias – a blinded experimental study, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 124, 178 Garfunkel, 1994, Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers’ recommendations and editorial decisions, JAMA, 272, 137, 10.1001/jama.272.2.137 Link, 1998, US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias, JAMA, 280, 246, 10.1001/jama.280.3.246 Nylenna, 1994, Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts: effects of referee characteristics and publication language, JAMA, 272, 149, 10.1001/jama.272.2.149 Fisher, 1994, The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review, JAMA, 272, 143, 10.1001/jama.272.2.143 Laband, 1994, A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review, JAMA, 272, 147, 10.1001/jama.272.2.147 McNutt, 1990, The effect of blinding on the quality of peer-review. A randomised trial, JAMA, 263, 1371, 10.1001/jama.263.10.1371 Godlee, 1998, Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 280, 237, 10.1001/jama.280.3.237 Rooyen, 1998, Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial, JAMA, 280, 234, 10.1001/jama.280.3.234 Walsh, 2000, Open peer review: a randomised control trial, Br. J. Psychiatry, 176, 47, 10.1192/bjp.176.1.47 Dickersin, 1987, Publication bias and clinical trials, Cont. Clin. Trials, 8, 343, 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90155-3 Thornhill, 1999, The biological significance of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection: A reply to Palmer, Am. Nat., 154, 234, 10.1086/303233 Jennions, 2001, Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis, Q. Rev. Biol., 76, 3, 10.1086/393743 Bauchau, 1997, Is there a ‘file drawer problem’ in biological research?, Oikos, 79, 407, 10.2307/3546025 Stern, 1997, Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects, Br. Med. J., 315, 640, 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.640 Gregoire, 1995, Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias?, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 48, 159, 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00098-B Trengenza, 1997, Darwin a better name than Wallace?, Nature, 385, 480, 10.1038/385480a0 Shadish, 1995, Author judgements about works they cite: three studies from psychology journals, Soc. Stud. Sci., 25, 477, 10.1177/030631295025003003 Ravnskov, 1992, Cholesterol lowering trials in coronary heart disease: frequency of citation and outcome, Br. Med. J., 305, 15, 10.1136/bmj.305.6844.15 Joyce, 1998, Reviewing the reviews. The example of chronic fatigue syndrome, JAMA, 280, 264, 10.1001/jama.280.3.264 Koren, 1991, Bias against negative studies in newspaper reports of medical research, JAMA, 266, 1824, 10.1001/jama.266.13.1824 Egger, 1997, Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German, Lancet, 350, 326, 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02419-7 Rosenthal, 1979, The ‘file drawer problem’ and tolerance for null results, Psychol. Bull., 86, 638, 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 Gleser, 1996, Models for estimating the number of unpublished studies, Stat. Med., 15, 2493, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961215)15:23<2493::AID-SIM381>3.0.CO;2-C Gurevitch, 1999, Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses, Ecology, 80, 1142, 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:SIIEMA]2.0.CO;2 Light, 1984 Egger, 1997, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test, Br. Med. J., 315, 629, 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 Begg, 1994, Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias, Biometrics, 50, 1088, 10.2307/2533446 Duvall, 2000, Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis, Biometrics, 56, 455, 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x Johnston, 1991, Publication bias, Br. Med. J., 337, 1102 Dickersin, 1990, The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence, JAMA, 263, 1385, 10.1001/jama.263.10.1385 Berlin, J.A. (1992) Will publication bias vanish in the age of online journals? Online J. Curr. Clin. Trials 1992 Jul. 8, Doc. No. 12 http://govt.ucsd.edu/newjour/o/msg01600.html Song, 1999, The role of electronic journals in reducing publication bias, Med. Inform. Internet Med., 24, 223, 10.1080/146392399298429 Meslin, 1994, Toward an ethic in dissemination of new knowledge in primary care research, 32 Chalmers, 1990, Under-reporting research is scientific misconduct, JAMA, 263, 1405, 10.1001/jama.263.10.1405