Bone appositional rate and percentage of doubly and singly labeled surfaces: Comparison of data from 5 and 20 μm sections

Bone - Tập 8 - Trang 7-12 - 1987
D.H. Birkenhäger-Frenkel1, J.C. Birkenhäger1
1Departments of Pathology I and Internal Medicine III, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Burkhardt, 1966, Präparative Voraussetzungen zur klinischen Histologie des menschlichen Knochenmarkes, Blut, 14, 30, 10.1007/BF01633163 Frost, 1963, Measurement of human bone formation by means of tetracycline labelling, Can. J. Biochem. Physiol., 41, 31, 10.1139/o63-005 Frost, 1977, Histomorphometry of trabecular bone I. Theoretical correction of appositional rate measurements, 361 Frost, 1980, Resting seams: “On” and “Off” in lamellar bone forming centers, Metab. Bone Dis. Rel. Res., 2 S, 167 Frost, 1983, Bone histomorphometry: Correction for the labeling “escape error”, 133 Gundersen, 1980, Estimation of true lamina thickness from apparent width, Metab. Bone Dis. Rel. Res., 2 S, 281 Kragstrup, 1982, Estimation of the three-dimensional wall thickness of completed remodeling sites in iliac trabecular bone, Metab. Bone Dis. Rel. Res., 4, 113, 10.1016/0221-8747(82)90024-8 Melsen, 1980, Interpretation of single labels after in vivo double labelling, Metab. Bone Dis. Rel. Res., 2 S, 171 Parfitt, 1983, Stereologic basis of bone histomorphometry: Theory of quantitative microscopy and reconstruction of the third dimension, 53 Schwartz, 1981, Comparison of surface density and volume of human iliac trabecular bone measured directly and by applied stereology, Calcif. Tissue Int., 33, 561, 10.1007/BF02409492