On Quantum Propensities: Two Arguments Revisited
Tóm tắt
Peter Milne and Neal Grossman have argued against Popper's propensity interpretation of quantum mechanics, by appeal to the two-slit experiment and to the distinction between mixtures and superpositions, respectively. In this paper I show that a different propensity interpretation successfully meets their objections. According to this interpretation, the possession of a quantum propensity by a quantum system is independent of the experimental set-ups designed to test it, even though its manifestations are not.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cartwright, N.: 1974, 'A Dilemma for the Traditional Interpretation of Quantum Mixtures', in K. Schaffner and R. Cohen (eds.), Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association Meeting, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 251–258.
Fine, A.: 1987, 'With Complacency or Concern: Solving the Quantum Measurement Problem', in Kelvin's Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 491–505.
Fine, A.: 1992, 'Resolving the Measurement Problem: Reply to Stairs', Foundations of Physics Letters 5, 125–138.
Grossman, N.: 1972, 'Quantum Mechanics and Interpretations of Probability Theory', Philosophy of Science 39, 451–460.
Healey, R.:(1989), The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Martin, C.: 1994, 'Dispositions and Conditionals', Philosophical Quarterly 44, 1–8.
Mellor, H.: 1974, The Matter of Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mellor, H.: 2000, 'The Semantics and Ontology of Dispositions', Mind 109, 757–780.
Milne, P.: 1985, 'A Note on Popper, Propensities and the Two Slit Experiment', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36, 66–70.
Mumford, S.: 1998, Dispositions, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Popper, K.: 1957, 'The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability, and the Quantum Theory', in S. Körner (ed.), Observation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics, pp. 65–70.
Popper, K.: 1959, 'The Propensity Interpretation of Probability', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10, 25–43.
Popper, K.:(1963), Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge, London.
Popper, K.: 1967, 'Quantum Mechanics without the Observer', in M. Bunge (ed.), Quantum Theory and Reality, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 7–44.
Popper, K.: 1982, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, Vol. III of the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.
Stein, H.: 1997, 'Maximal Extension of an Impossibility Theorem Concerning Quantum Measurement', in R. Cohen and J. Stachel (eds.), Potentiality, Entanglement and Passion at a Distance, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Suárez, M.: 2004, 'Quantum Selections, Propensities, and the Problem of Measurement'', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55(2), 219–255.