Implementing isolation perimeters around genetically modified maize fields
Tóm tắt
Due to the growing cultivation area of genetically modified (GM) maize and the rising number of GM maize varieties commercially available to European farmers, the co-existence between GM and non-GM maize is becoming a burning issue in some European regions. Hence, Member States are imposing or discussing specific co-existence measures to keep the adventitious presence of GM material in non-GM produces below the established labelling threshold. As maize is a cross-pollinated crop that uses wind for the dispersal of its pollen, on-farm co-existence measures may rely on the spatial isolation of GM and non-GM maize fields. In this study, we developed an approach that combines geographic information system (GIS) datasets with Monte Carlo simulations to assess the feasibility of implementing isolation perimeters around GM maize fields, since its practical implementation is rarely addressed in the co-existence debate. More specifically, five scenarios differing in shares and spatial distributions of GM maize were tested for various isolation perimeters in two agricultural areas in Flanders (Belgium). The GIS analyses emphasised the small size of maize fields and their scattered distribution throughout the cropped area. The feasibility of implementing isolation perimeters was largely affected by the (GM) maize share, the spatial distribution of GM maize, and the width of isolation perimeters. The higher the (GM) maize share and the wider the isolation perimeter, the higher the proportions of farmers with non-GM maize fields occurring within the implemented isolation perimeter. Compared with randomly distributed GM maize fields, the clustering of GM maize fields on a larger scale and at the farm level increased the feasibility of implementing isolation perimeters. The approach developed proved to be a valuable tool to quantify the feasibility of implementing isolation perimeters under real agricultural conditions.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bannert M. (2006) Simulation of transgenic pollen dispersal by use of different grain colour maize, Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
EC (2003a) Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming, Official J. Euro. Comm. L189, 36–47.
EC (2003b) Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed, Official J. Euro. Comm. L268, 1–23.
EC (2006) Report on the implementation of national measures on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming.
Delia Porta G., Ederle D., Bucchini L., Prandi M., Pozzi C., Verderio A. (2006) Gene flow between neighboring maize fields in the Po Valley: a fact-finding investigation regarding coexistence between conventional and non-conventional maize farming in the region of Lombardy, Italy. Report, Centro Documentazione Agrobiotechnologie, Milan, Italy.
Demeke T., Perry D.J., Scowcroft W.R. (2006) Adventitious presence of GMOs: scientific overview for Canadian grains, Can. J. Plant Sci. 86, 1–23.
Devos Y., Reheul D., De Schrijver A. (2005) The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization, Environ. Biosafety Res. 4, 71–87.
Devos Y., Reheul D., De Waele D., Van Speybroeck L., (accepted) The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union, Environ. Biosafety Res.
Dolezel M., Pascher K., Grabherr G. (2005) Regionality as a key parameter for co-existence of genetically modified maize with conventional and organic maize, in: Messéan A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Co-existence between GM and non-GM based agricultural supply chains, Agropolis Productions, Montpellier, pp. 203–206.
Flannery M.-L., Meade C., Mullins E. (2005) Employing a composite gene-flow index to numerically quantify a crop’s potential for gene flow: an Irish perspective, Environ. Biosafety Res. 4, 29–43.
Goggi A.S., Caragea P., Lopez-Sanchez H., Westgate M., Arritt R., Clark C. (2006) Statistical analysis of outcrossing between adjacent maize grain production fields, Field Crop Res. 99, 147–157.
Gustafson D.I., Brants I.O., Horak M.J., Remund K.M., Rosenbaum E.W., Soteres J.K. (2006) Empirical modeling of genetically modified maize grain production practices to achieve European Union labeling thresholds, Crop Sci. 46, 2133–2140.
Halsey M.E., Remund K.M., Davis C.A., Quails M., Eppard P.J., Berberich S.A. (2005) Isolation of maize from pollen-mediated gene flow by time and distance, Crop Sci. 45, 2172–2185.
Marvier M., Van Acker R.C. (2005) Can crop transgenes be kept on a leash? Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 99–106.
Messéan A., Angevin F., Gómez-Barbero M., Menrad K., Rodríguez-Cerezo E. (2006) New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Report, Joint Research Centre and Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain.
Messeguer J., Peñas G., Ballester J., Bas M., Serra J., Salvia J., Palaudelmàs M., Melé E. (2006) Pollen-mediated gene flow in maize in real situations of coexistence, Plant Biotechnol. J. 4, 633–645.
Pla M., La Paz J.-L., Peñas G., García N., Palaudelmàs M., Esteve T., Messeguer J., Melé E. (2006) Assessment of real-time PCR based methods for quantification of pollen-mediated gene flow from GM to conventional maize in a field study, Transgenic Res. 15, 219–228.
Sanvido O., Widmer F., Winzeler M., Streit B., Szerencsits E., Bigler F. (2005) An evaluation of measures to ensure agricultural coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in Switzerland, in: Messéan A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Coexistence between GM and non-GM based agricultural supply chains, Agropolis Productions, Montpellier, pp. 179–182.
Schiemann J. (2003) Co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming, Environ. Biosafety Res. 2, 213–217.
Van De Wiel C.C.M., Lotz L.A.P. (2006) Outcrossing and coexistence of genetically modified with (genetically) unmodified crops: a case study of the situation in the Netherlands, Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 54, 17–35.
Weber W.E., Bringezu T., Broer I., Holz F., Eder J. (2007) Coexistence between GM and non-GM maize crops-tested in 2004 at the field scale level (Erprobungsanbau 2004), J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 193, 79–92.
Weekes R., Allnutt T., Boffey C., Morgan S., Bilton M., Daniels R., Henry C. (2007) A study of crop-to-crop gene flow using farm scale sites of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in the UK, Transgenic Res., doi: 10.1007/s11248-006-9036-0.