Biomechanical study of mandible bone supporting a four-implant retained bridge

Medical Engineering & Physics - Tập 31 - Trang 806-815 - 2009
A.S. Bonnet1, M. Postaire2, P. Lipinski1
1Laboratory of Mechanics, Biomechanics, Polymers and Structures (LaBPS), ENIM, Ile du Saulcy 57045 Metz, France
2Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, René Descartes University Paris V, 92120 Montrouge, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Branemark, 1977, Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaws. Experience from a 10-year study period., Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 16, 1 Branemark, 1995, Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Branemark in full edentulism, Clin Oral Implants Res, 6, 227, 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x Branemark, 1999, Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up., Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 1, 2, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00086.x Branemark, 1985 Branemark, 1998, Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog, J Ortho Res, 16, 61, 10.1002/jor.1100160111 Krekmanov, 2000, Titling of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, 405 Malo, 2003, All-on-four” immediate-function concept with Branemark system implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 5, 2, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x Malo, 2005, All-on-four” immediate-function concept with Branemark system implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 7, 88, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00080.x Satoh, 2005, Biomechanical rational for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, 533 Las Casas, 2008, Comparative 3D finite element stress analysis of straight and angled wedge-shaped implant designs, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, 215 Brunski, 2000, Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments, Inter J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, 15 Duyck, 2000, Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses: an in vivo study, Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, 465, 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005465.x Koolstra, 1988, A three dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces, J Biomechanics, 21, 563, 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90219-9 Natali, 2003, Mechanics of bone tissue, 1 Hoshaw, 1994, Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling, Inter J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, 345 Natali, 2003, Numerical approach to dental biomechanics, 211 Natali, 2006, Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach, Clin Oral Implant Res, 17, 67, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01162.x Röhrle, 2007, Three-dimensional finite element modeling of muscles forces during mastication, J Biomechanics, 40, 3363, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.011 Nomura, 2003, Micromechanics/structure relationships in the human mandible, Dent Mat, 19, 167, 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00026-X O’Mahony, 2001, Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading, Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, 648, 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120614.x LIao, 2007, Anisotropic finite element modeling for patient-specific mandible, Comput Methods Prog Biomed, 88, 197, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.09.009 LIao, 2008, Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT, Comput Med Imag Graph, 32, 53, 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.09.001 Mellal, 2004, Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data, Clin Oral Implant Res, 15, 239, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01000.x Berglundh, 2005, Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs, J Clin Periodontol, 32, 925, 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00747.x Dubois, 2007, Biomechanical study of a prosthetic solution based on an angled abutment: case of upper lateral incisor, Med Eng Phys, 29, 989, 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.10.017 Orthorp, 2000, Clinical experiences of CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: 1-year prospective study, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2, 2, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00101.x Cruz, 2003, Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant, Inter J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, 675 Hansson, 2004, Area moments of inertia as a measure of the mandible stiffness of the implant patient, Clin Oral Implant Res, 15, 450, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01021.x Nickel, 1994, In vitro measurement of the frictional properties of the temporomandibular joint disc, Arch Oral Biol, 39, 323, 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90124-4 Van Zyl, 1995, Three dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses, Inter J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, 51 Koolstra, 2003, Number crunching with the human masticatory system, J Dent Res, 82, 672, 10.1177/154405910308200903 Daas, 2008, A Complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations, Med Eng Phys, 30, 218, 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.02.005 Voigt, 1889, Über die Bezechnung zwischen den beidem Elastizitätskonstanten isotroper Körper, Wied Ann, 33, 573, 10.1002/andp.18892741206 Chun, 2005, Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments, J Oral Rehabil, 32, 193, 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01407.x Brunski, 2000, Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, 15 Takayama, 2001, The dynamic behaviour of a lower complete denture during unilateral loads: analysis using the finite element method, J Oral Rehabil, 28, 1064, 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00759.x Katz, 1987, The elastic anisotropy of bone, J Biomech, 20, 1063, 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90024-8 Akça, 2002, Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism, J Oral Rehabil, 29, 350, 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00872.x Castaño, 2002, Creation of a three-dimensional model of the mandible and the TMJ in vivo by means of the finite element method, Int J Comput Dent, 5, 87 Bonnet-Lebouvier, 2002, Numerical study of shear deformation in Ti-6Al-4V at medium and high strain rates, critical impact velocity in shear, Int J Impact Eng, 27, 755, 10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00010-6 Watanabe, 2003, Finite element analysis of the influence of implant inclination, loading position, and load direction on stress distribution, Odontology, 91, 31, 10.1007/s10266-003-0029-7 Borchers, 1983, Three dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development, J Dent Res, 62, 155, 10.1177/00220345830620021401 Atmaram, 1981, Estimation of physiologic stresses with a natural tooth considering fibrous PDL structure, J Dent Res, 60, 873, 10.1177/00220345810600050301 Hoshaw, 1994, The effect of implant insertion and design on bone microdamage, 735 Currey, 1984 Keaveny, 1994, Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains, J Biomech, 27, 1127, 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90053-1