Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest

Clinical Oral Implants Research - Tập 16 Số 4 - Trang 486-494 - 2005
Cynthia S. Petrie1, John L. Williams
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. [email protected]

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectives: Our aim was to analyze and compare systematically the relative and interactive effects of implant diameter, length, and taper on calculated crestal bone strains.Material and methods: Three‐dimensional finite‐element models were created of a 20‐mm premolar section of the mandible with a single endosseous implant embedded in high‐ or low‐density cancellous bone. Oblique (200‐N vertical and 40‐N horizontal) occlusal loading was applied. Cortical and cancellous bone were modeled as transversely isotropic and linearly elastic. Perfect bonding was assumed at all interfaces. A two‐level factorial statistical design was used to determine the main and interactive effects of four implant design variables on maximum shear strains in the crestal alveolar bone: diameter, length of tapered segment, length of untapered segment, and taper. Implant diameter ranged from 3.5 to 6 mm, total implant length from 5.75 to 23.5 mm, and taper from 0 to 14°, resulting in 16 implant designs.Results: Increasing implant diameter resulted in as much as a 3.5‐fold reduction in crestal strain, increasing length caused as much as a 1.65‐fold reduction, whereas taper increased crestal strain, especially in narrow and short implants, where it increased 1.65‐fold. Diameter, length, and taper have to be considered together because of their interactive effects on crestal bone strain.Conclusion: If the objective is to minimize peri‐implant strain in the crestal alveolar bone, a wide and relatively long, untapered implant appears to be the most favorable choice. Narrow, short implants with taper in the crestal region should be avoided, especially in low‐density bone.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80010-2

Becker W., 1990, Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 5, 31

Box G.E.P., 1978, Statistics for Experimenters. An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building, 306

10.1016/0021-9290(70)90028-X

10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00891.x

Cook S.D., 1995, Endosseous Implants for Maxillofacial Reconstruction, 71

10.1016/0021-9290(91)90311-A

10.1002/ajpa.1330900304

Duyck J., 1997, Biomechanics of oral implants, Technology and Health Care, 5, 253, 10.3233/THC-1997-5401

10.1067/mpr.2001.115251

Holmes D.C., 1997, Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants, Journal of Oral Implantology, 23, 104

10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:EPOODI>2.3.CO;2

Hoshaw S.J., 1994, Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 9, 345

10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070208.x

10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00001.x

Ivanoff C.‐J., 1999, Influence of variations in implants diameters, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 14, 173

Jemt T., 1989, Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 4, 211

10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00036-5

10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19220233.x

Lekholm U., 1985, Tissue‐Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, 199

10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030102.x

Mailath G., 1989, Die Knochenresorption an der Eintrittstelle osseointegrierter Implantate – ein biomechanisches Phänomen. Eine Finite‐Element‐Studie, Zeitschrift für Stomatologie, 86, 207

Martin R.B., 1989, Structure, Function, and Adaptation of Compact Bone

10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x

Matsushita Y., 1990, Two‐dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants, Journal of Oral Implantology, 16, 6

10.1016/0022-3913(92)90293-J

10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90437-8

Morneburg T.R., 2002, Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads, International Journal of Prosthodontics, 15, 20

Morneburg T.R., 2003, In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency, International Journal of Prosthodontics, 16, 481

10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090508.x

10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090204.x

10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005415.x

10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120614.x

10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080303.x

10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00061-9

10.1142/S0219519402000435

10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x

10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00450.x

Renouard F., 1999, Five‐mm‐diameter implants without a smooth surface collar, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 14, 101

10.1002/j.0022-0337.1988.52.12.tb02283.x

Rubin C., 1996, Differentiation of the bone‐tissue remodeling response to axial and torsional loading in the turkey ulna, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 78, 1523, 10.2106/00004623-199610000-00010

10.1902/jop.1993.64.6.529

Siegele D., 1989, Numerical investigation of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 4, 333

Tada S., 2003, Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 18, 357

Vaillancourt H., 1996, Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 11, 351

10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090606.x

10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.22

Zienkiewicz O.C., 2000, The Finite Element Method. Vol. 1: The Basis, 401

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Tập 16 Số 4

486-494

Thông tin tác giả