Does spatial proximity to customers matter for innovative performance?

Research Policy - Tập 38 - Trang 746-755 - 2009
Anet Weterings1, Ron Boschma2
1Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, P.O. Box 30 314, 2500 GH The Hague, The Netherlands
2Department of Economic Geography, Faculty of GeoSciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80 115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aiken, 1991 Asheim, 2002, Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge, Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77, 10.1023/A:1013100704794 Bathelt, 2004, Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31, 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa Belderbos, 2004, Cooperative R&D and firm performance, Research Policy, 33, 1477, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003 Bleichrodt, H., Louter, P.J., Sleegers, W.F., 1992. Young Economic Activities in The Netherlands: An Economic Geography Perspective. EGI-research publication No. 02, Economic Geographic Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam (in Dutch). Boschma, 2005, Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies, 39, 61, 10.1080/0034340052000320887 Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., 2003. Mobility and Social Networks: Localized Knowledge Spillovers Revisited, CESPRI working paper No. 142, Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation Process, Universita Bocconi, Milan. Brouwer, 1996, Determinants of innovation: a microeconometric analysis of three alternative innovation output indicators, 99 Brown, 2000, Mysteries of the region: knowledge dynamics in Silicon Valley, 16 Chabchoub, 2005, Explaining the propensity to patent computer software, Technovation, 25, 971, 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.015 Cohen, 1990, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128, 10.2307/2393553 Conway, 1995, Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process: an empirical study, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 7, 327, 10.1080/09537329508524216 Cowan, 2000, The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 211, 10.1093/icc/9.2.211 Djellal, G., Gallouj, F., 2000. Innovation surveys for service industries: a review. Paper presented at the DG Enterprise Conference on ‘Innovation and Enterprise Creation, Statistics and Indicators’, Sophia Antipolis, France, October 2000. Freel, 2003, Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity, Research Policy, 32, 751, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7 Freeman, 1991, Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues, Research Policy, 20, 499, 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X Gallaud, 2005, Geographical proximity and the diffusion of knowledge, 127 Gallouj, 2002, Innovation in services and the attendant old and new myths, Journal of Socio-Economics, 31, 137, 10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00126-3 Gertler, 2003, Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there), Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 75, 10.1093/jeg/3.1.75 Giuliani, 2005, The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster, Research Policy, 34, 47, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.008 Grabher, 1993 Hollenstein, 2003, Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: a cluster analysis based on firm-level data, Research Policy, 32, 845, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00091-4 Howells, 2002, Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography, Urban Studies, 39, 871, 10.1080/00420980220128354 Isaksen, 2004, Knowledge-based clusters and urban location: the clustering of the software consultancy in Oslo, Urban Studies, 41, 1157, 10.1080/00420980410001675797 Kleinknecht, 2000 Knoben, 2008, The effects of spatial mobility on the performance of firms, Economic Geography, 84, 157, 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00402.x Kogut, 1996, What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning, Organization Science, 7, 502, 10.1287/orsc.7.5.502 Lissoni, 2001, Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: the case of the Breschia mechanical cluster, Research Policy, 30, 1479, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00163-9 Lundvall, 1988, Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation, 349 Malmberg, 2002, The elusive concept of localisation economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering, Environment and Planning A, 34, 429, 10.1068/a3457 Nelson, 2000, National innovation systems, 11 Nelson, 1982 Nooteboom, 1999, Innovation, learning and industrial organization, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 127, 10.1093/cje/23.2.127 Oerlemans, 1998, Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation, Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 89, 298 Ragatz, 1997, Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development, Journal of Product and Innovation Management, 14, 190, 10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00007-6 Rallet, 2000, Is geographical proximity necessary in innovation networks in the era of global economy?, GeoJournal, 49, 373, 10.1023/A:1007140329027 Romijn, 2002, Innovation, networking and proximity: lessons from small high technology firms in the UK, Regional Studies, 36, 81, 10.1080/00343400120099889 Stam E., 2003. Why Butterflies don’t Leave. Locational Evolution of Evolving Enterprises. Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht (dissertation). Steiner, M., Adametz, C., Novakovic, M., 2001. Measuring innovation-orientated activities for business services: traditional versus knowledge based indicators. Paper presented at the 41st Conference of the European Regional Science Association, August, Zagreb, Croatia. Tether, 2002, Who co-operates for innovation, and why? An empirical analysis, Research Policy, 31, 947, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X Tether, 2003, The sources and aims of innovation in services: variety between and within sectors, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12, 481, 10.1080/1043859022000029221 Torre, 2005, Proximity and localisation, Regional Studies, 39, 47, 10.1080/0034340052000320842 Uzzi, 1997, Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35, 10.2307/2393808 Von Hippel, 1988 Weterings, A., 2006. Do firms benefit from spatial proximity? Netherlands Geographical Studies 336. KNAG/Faculty of GeoSciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht (dissertation).