Is group selection necessary? An alternative interpretation of homogeneous Middleman groups: Comments on Janet Landa’s paper
Tóm tắt
This article critiques the efforts by Janet Landa, David Sloan Wilson and others to use group selection paradigms to explain the success of homogenous middlemen groups (HMGs). It argues that group selection theory cannot explain the conflicts of interests that arise within HMGs or why they dissolve in certain occasions. Landa’s earlier explanations, which stressed the combination of genetic (kinship) and social bonds in the creation of trust and cooperation in the extension of credit and the creation of local public goods, better predicts both the strength and weaknesses of HMGs.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alchian A., Crawford R., Klein B. (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law & Economics 21: 297–326
Buchanan J.M. (1965) An economics theory of clubs. Economica 32: 1–14
Carr J.L., Landa J.T. (1983) The economics of symbols, clan names and religion. The Journal of Legal Studies 13: 135–156
Coase R.H. (1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law & Economics 3: 1–44
Epstein R.A. (1992) The path to the T.J. Hooper: Of custom and due care. The Journal of Legal Studies 21: 1–38
Epstein R.A. (2004) Reflections on the historical origins and economic structure of the law merchant. Chicago Journal of International Law 5(1): 1–20
Ewart J.S. (1903) What is the law merchant?. Columbia Law Review 3(3): 135–154
Grief A. (2004) Impersonal exchange without impartial law: The community responsibility system. Chicago Journal of International Law 5(1): 109–138
Hamilton W.D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–16
Landa J.T. (1981) A theory of the ethnically homogeneous middleman group: An institutional alternative to contract law. The Journal of Legal Studies 10: 349–362
Landa, J. (2008). The bioeconomics of homogenous middleman groups as adaptive units: Theory and empirical evidence viewed from a group selection framework. Journal of Bioeconomics, 10(3) (Special Issue).
Wilson D.S. (2000) Religious groups and homogeneous merchant groups as adaptive units: A multilevel evolutionary perspective. [Letter to the Editors] Journal of Bioeconomics 2(3): 271–273
Wilson D.S. (2002) Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago