Optimal stochastic dynamic scheduling for managing community recovery from natural hazards

Reliability Engineering & System Safety - Tập 193 - Trang 106627 - 2020
Saeed Nozhati1, Yugandhar Sarkale2, Edwin K.P. Chong2,3, Bruce R. Ellingwood1
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372, United States
2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1373, United States
3Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1874, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bertsekas, 2017, 1 Baumeister, 2003, The psychology of irrationality: why people make foolish, self-defeating choices, Psychol Econ Decis, 1, 3 Frangopol, 2004, Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions, Prog Struct Eng Mater, 6, 197, 10.1002/pse.180 Fereshtehnejad, 2017, A randomized point-based value iteration POMDP enhanced with a counting process technique for optimal management of multi-state multi-element systems, Struct Saf, 65, 113, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.01.003 Corotis, 2005, Modeling of risk-based inspection, maintenance and life-cycle cost with partially observable Markov decision processes, Struct Infrastruct Eng, 1, 75, 10.1080/15732470412331289305 Papakonstantinou, 2014, Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programing and Markov processes. part I: theory, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 130, 202, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.005 Memarzadeh, 2019, Model-free reinforcement learning with model-based safe exploration: optimizing adaptive recovery process of infrastructure systems, Struct Saf, 80, 46, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.04.003 Smilowitz, 2000, Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure network, Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng, 15, 5, 10.1111/0885-9507.00166 Medury, 2013, Incorporating network considerations into pavement management systems: a case for approximate dynamic programming, Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 33, 134, 10.1016/j.trc.2013.03.003 Meidani, 2015, Random Markov decision processes for sustainable infrastructure systems, Struct Infrastruct Eng, 11, 655, 10.1080/15732479.2014.893445 Memarzadeh, 2016, Integrated inspection scheduling and maintenance planning for infrastructure systems, Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng, 31, 403, 10.1111/mice.12178 Gomez, 2019, An optimization-based decision support framework for coupled pre-and post-earthquake infrastructure risk management, Struct Saf, 77, 1, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.10.002 Burns, 2013, Mixed criticality systems-a review. department of computer science, university of york, Tech Rep, 1 Xia, 2017, Bounding the demand of mixed-criticality industrial wireless sensor networks, IEEE Access, 5, 7505, 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2654483 Baruah S, 2011, Mixed-criticality scheduling of sporadic task systems, 555 Powell, 2011 Chang, 2013 Fern, 2006, Approximate policy iteration with a policy language bias: solving relational Markov decision processes, J Artif Intell Res, 25, 75, 10.1613/jair.1700 Busoniu, 2010, 39 Nozhati, 2019, Near-optimal planning using approximate dynamic programming to enhance post-hazard community resilience management, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 181, 116, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.09.011 Bertsekas, 1999, Rollout algorithms for stochastic scheduling problems, J Heuristics, 5, 89, 10.1023/A:1009634810396 Bertsekas, 2013, 2989 The Association of Bay Area Governments (City of Gilroy Annex). (2011). http://resilience.abag.ca.gov/wp-content/documents/2010LHMP/Gilroy-Annex-2011.pdf. M. Harnish, 2015-2023 HOUSING element policy document and background report (Dec.2014). http://www.gilroy2040.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/GilHE_Adopted_HE_Compiled_web.pdf. Watts, 1998, Collective dynamics of small-world networks, Nature, 393, 440, 10.1038/30918 A. Adigaa, S. Agashea, C.L. Arifuzzamana, R. Barretta, K. Beckmana, J. Bisseta, J. Chena, S. Chungbaeka, E. Eubanka, M. Guptaa, C.J. Khana, H.S. Kuhlmana, E. Mortveita, E. Nordberga, P. Riversa, S. Stretza, A. Swarupa, D. Wilsona Xiea, Generating a synthetic population of the United States, Tech Rep (2015). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.712.1618. Abrahamson, 2013 2003 Sarkale, 2018, Solving Markov decision processes for network-level post-hazard recovery via simulation optimization and rollout (Invited paper) Nozhati, 2018, Identifying and analyzing interdependent critical infrastructure in post-earthquake urban reconstruction L. Xie, J. Tang, H. Tang, Q. Xie, S. Xue, Seismic fragility assessment of transmission towers via performance-based analysis, in: Proceedings of the 15th world conference earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal. Nozhati, 2019, Probabilistic framework for evaluating food security of households in the aftermath of a disaster, Struct Infrastruct Eng, 15, 1, 10.1080/15732479.2019.1584824 Nozhati, 2019, Understanding community resilience from a PRA perspective using binary decision diagrams, Risk Anal, 10.1111/risa.13321 Ouyang, 2012, A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems, Struct Saf, 36, 23, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004 Nozhati, 2019, An approximate dynamic programming approach to food security of communities following hazards, submitted to: Nozhati, 2018, A modified approximate dynamic programming algorithm for community-level food security following disasters Nozhati, 2018, An approximate dynamic programming approach to community recovery management Aslett, 2012 Ibe, 2013 Masoomi, 2018, Quantifying socioeconomic impact of a Tornado by estimating population outmigration as a resilience metric at the community level, J Struct Eng, 144, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002019 Masoomi, 2018, Restoration and functionality assessment of a community subjected to tornado hazard, Struct Infrast Eng, 14, 275, 10.1080/15732479.2017.1354030 Xu, 2019, Improving repair sequence scheduling methods for postdisaster critical infrastructure systems, Comput Aided Civil Infrast Eng, 34, 506, 10.1111/mice.12435 Howard, 1960 Cha, 2014, Risk-averse decision-making for civil infrastructure exposed to low-probability, high-consequence events, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 104, 27 Nilim, 2005, Robust control of Markov decision processes with uncertain transition matrices, Oper Res, 53, 780, 10.1287/opre.1050.0216 Iyengar, 2005, Robust dynamic programming, Math Oper Res, 30, 257, 10.1287/moor.1040.0129 Shapiro, 2013, Risk neutral and risk averse stochastic dual dynamic programming method, Eur J Oper Res, 224, 375, 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.022