Optimal stochastic dynamic scheduling for managing community recovery from natural hazards
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bertsekas, 2017, 1
Baumeister, 2003, The psychology of irrationality: why people make foolish, self-defeating choices, Psychol Econ Decis, 1, 3
Frangopol, 2004, Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions, Prog Struct Eng Mater, 6, 197, 10.1002/pse.180
Fereshtehnejad, 2017, A randomized point-based value iteration POMDP enhanced with a counting process technique for optimal management of multi-state multi-element systems, Struct Saf, 65, 113, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.01.003
Corotis, 2005, Modeling of risk-based inspection, maintenance and life-cycle cost with partially observable Markov decision processes, Struct Infrastruct Eng, 1, 75, 10.1080/15732470412331289305
Papakonstantinou, 2014, Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programing and Markov processes. part I: theory, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 130, 202, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.005
Memarzadeh, 2019, Model-free reinforcement learning with model-based safe exploration: optimizing adaptive recovery process of infrastructure systems, Struct Saf, 80, 46, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.04.003
Smilowitz, 2000, Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure network, Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng, 15, 5, 10.1111/0885-9507.00166
Medury, 2013, Incorporating network considerations into pavement management systems: a case for approximate dynamic programming, Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 33, 134, 10.1016/j.trc.2013.03.003
Meidani, 2015, Random Markov decision processes for sustainable infrastructure systems, Struct Infrastruct Eng, 11, 655, 10.1080/15732479.2014.893445
Memarzadeh, 2016, Integrated inspection scheduling and maintenance planning for infrastructure systems, Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng, 31, 403, 10.1111/mice.12178
Gomez, 2019, An optimization-based decision support framework for coupled pre-and post-earthquake infrastructure risk management, Struct Saf, 77, 1, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.10.002
Burns, 2013, Mixed criticality systems-a review. department of computer science, university of york, Tech Rep, 1
Xia, 2017, Bounding the demand of mixed-criticality industrial wireless sensor networks, IEEE Access, 5, 7505, 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2654483
Baruah S, 2011, Mixed-criticality scheduling of sporadic task systems, 555
Powell, 2011
Chang, 2013
Fern, 2006, Approximate policy iteration with a policy language bias: solving relational Markov decision processes, J Artif Intell Res, 25, 75, 10.1613/jair.1700
Busoniu, 2010, 39
Nozhati, 2019, Near-optimal planning using approximate dynamic programming to enhance post-hazard community resilience management, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 181, 116, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.09.011
Bertsekas, 1999, Rollout algorithms for stochastic scheduling problems, J Heuristics, 5, 89, 10.1023/A:1009634810396
Bertsekas, 2013, 2989
The Association of Bay Area Governments (City of Gilroy Annex). (2011). http://resilience.abag.ca.gov/wp-content/documents/2010LHMP/Gilroy-Annex-2011.pdf.
M. Harnish, 2015-2023 HOUSING element policy document and background report (Dec.2014). http://www.gilroy2040.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/GilHE_Adopted_HE_Compiled_web.pdf.
Watts, 1998, Collective dynamics of small-world networks, Nature, 393, 440, 10.1038/30918
A. Adigaa, S. Agashea, C.L. Arifuzzamana, R. Barretta, K. Beckmana, J. Bisseta, J. Chena, S. Chungbaeka, E. Eubanka, M. Guptaa, C.J. Khana, H.S. Kuhlmana, E. Mortveita, E. Nordberga, P. Riversa, S. Stretza, A. Swarupa, D. Wilsona Xiea, Generating a synthetic population of the United States, Tech Rep (2015). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.712.1618.
Abrahamson, 2013
2003
Sarkale, 2018, Solving Markov decision processes for network-level post-hazard recovery via simulation optimization and rollout (Invited paper)
Nozhati, 2018, Identifying and analyzing interdependent critical infrastructure in post-earthquake urban reconstruction
L. Xie, J. Tang, H. Tang, Q. Xie, S. Xue, Seismic fragility assessment of transmission towers via performance-based analysis, in: Proceedings of the 15th world conference earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
Nozhati, 2019, Probabilistic framework for evaluating food security of households in the aftermath of a disaster, Struct Infrastruct Eng, 15, 1, 10.1080/15732479.2019.1584824
Nozhati, 2019, Understanding community resilience from a PRA perspective using binary decision diagrams, Risk Anal, 10.1111/risa.13321
Ouyang, 2012, A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems, Struct Saf, 36, 23, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
Nozhati, 2019, An approximate dynamic programming approach to food security of communities following hazards, submitted to:
Nozhati, 2018, A modified approximate dynamic programming algorithm for community-level food security following disasters
Nozhati, 2018, An approximate dynamic programming approach to community recovery management
Aslett, 2012
Ibe, 2013
Masoomi, 2018, Quantifying socioeconomic impact of a Tornado by estimating population outmigration as a resilience metric at the community level, J Struct Eng, 144, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002019
Masoomi, 2018, Restoration and functionality assessment of a community subjected to tornado hazard, Struct Infrast Eng, 14, 275, 10.1080/15732479.2017.1354030
Xu, 2019, Improving repair sequence scheduling methods for postdisaster critical infrastructure systems, Comput Aided Civil Infrast Eng, 34, 506, 10.1111/mice.12435
Howard, 1960
Cha, 2014, Risk-averse decision-making for civil infrastructure exposed to low-probability, high-consequence events, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 104, 27
Nilim, 2005, Robust control of Markov decision processes with uncertain transition matrices, Oper Res, 53, 780, 10.1287/opre.1050.0216
Iyengar, 2005, Robust dynamic programming, Math Oper Res, 30, 257, 10.1287/moor.1040.0129
Shapiro, 2013, Risk neutral and risk averse stochastic dual dynamic programming method, Eur J Oper Res, 224, 375, 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.022