Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist–Luenberger index

Ecological Economics - Tập 56 - Trang 280-293 - 2006
Surender Kumar1
1National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi 110067, India

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arrow, 1962, The economic implications of learning by doing, Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155, 10.2307/2295952 Atkinson, 2002 Ball, 1994, Incorporating undesirable outputs into models of production: an application to U.S. agriculture, Cahiers d'Economie Sociologie Rurales, 31, 60 Baumol, 1986, Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: what the long-run data show, American Economic Review, 76, 1072 Baumol, 1989 Boggs, R.L., 1997. Hazardous waste treatment facilities: modeling production with pollution as both an input and an output. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Chapple, 2003, Accounting for solid waste generation in measuring of regional productivity growth Chung, 1997, Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229, 10.1006/jema.1997.0146 Cropper, 1992, Environmental economics: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 675 Etkins, 1994, Trade, environment and development: the issues in perspective, Ecological Economics, 9, 1, 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90012-4 Färe, 1994 Färe, 1994, Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialised countries, American Economic Review, 84, 66 Färe, 2001, Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth, Journal of Regional Sciences, 41, 381, 10.1111/0022-4146.00223 Gollop, 1983, Environmental regulations and productivity growth: the case of fossil-fuelled electric power generation, Journal of Political Economy, 91, 654, 10.1086/261170 Hailu, 2000, Environmentally sensitive productivity analysis of the Canadian pulp and paper industry, 1959–1994: an input distance function approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40, 251, 10.1006/jeem.2000.1124 Haynes, 1993, Environmental decision models: U.S. experience and a new approach to pollution management, Environment International, 19, 261, 10.1016/0160-4120(93)90087-X Haynes, 1994, Toward a pollution abatement monitoring policy: measurements, model mechanics, and data requirements, The Environmental Professional, 16, 292 Hettige, 1992, The toxic intensity of industrial production: global patterns, trends, and trade policy, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 478 Kopp, 1998, Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: a structural approach, Journal of Applied Statistics, 25, 489, 10.1080/02664769822972 Lall, 2002, Productivity growth in the Western Hemisphere (1978–94): the Caribbean in perspective, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 213, 10.1023/A:1015008020851 Murty, 2004 Murty, 2002 OECD. Future liberalisation of trade in environmental goods and services: ensuring environmental protection as well as economic benefits. Joint Working Party on Trade and Environment, COM/ENV(98)37/FINAL. Olson, 1996, Big bills on the side walk: why some nations are rich, and others poor, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 3, 10.1257/jep.10.2.3 Pittman, 1981, Issues in pollution control: interplant cost differences and economies of scale, Land Economics, 57, 1, 10.2307/3145748 Pittman, 1983, Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs, Economic Journal, 93, 883, 10.2307/2232753 Reinhard, 1999, Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: an application to Dutch dairy farms, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 44, 10.2307/1244449 Taskin, 2001, The role of international trade on environmental efficiency: a DEA approach, Economic Modelling, 18, 1, 10.1016/S0264-9993(00)00025-0 Yaisawarng, 1994, The effects of sulphur dioxide controls on productivity change in the U.S. electric power industry, Review of Economics and Statistics, 96, 447, 10.2307/2109970 Young, 2003