The pace of governed energy transitions: Agency, international dynamics and the global Paris agreement accelerating decarbonisation processes?

Energy Research & Social Science - Tập 22 - Trang 13-17 - 2016
Florian Kern1, Karoline S. Rogge1,2
1Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
2Fraunhofer Institute of Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Sovacool, 2016, How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 13, 202, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020 Grin, 2010, Transitions to sustainable development Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Fouquet, 2010, The slow search for solutions: lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service, Energy Policy, 38, 6586, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.029 Verbong, 2012, Governing the energy transition Reality Hamamoto, 2011, Energy efficiency regulation and R&D activity: a study of the top runner program in Japan, Low Carbon Econ., 02, 91, 10.4236/lce.2011.22012 Quitzow, 2014, The concept of lead markets revisited: contribution to environmental innovation theory, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, 10, 4, 10.1016/j.eist.2013.11.002 U.N.E.P. Frankfurt School of Finance , Management , Bloomberg New Energy, 2016 REN21, 2016 Rogge, 2011, The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System —findings of company case studies in the German power sector, Ecol. Econ., 70, 513, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.032 Johnstone, 2011, Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts, Environ. Resour. Econ., 45, 133, 10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1 Leaton, 2011 Seyfang, 2012, Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions, Environ. Plann.-Part C, 30, 381, 10.1068/c10222 Geels, 2016, The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014), Res. Policy, 45, 896, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015 Morris, 2015 BDEW, 2016 Pfluger, 2016 Hoppmann, 2014, Compulsive policy-making—the evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power, Res. Policy, 43, 1422, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.014 Quitzow, 2015, Dynamics of a policy-driven market: the co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, 17, 126, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.002 Kern, 2015, Empowering sustainable niches: comparing UK and Dutch offshore wind developments, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 100, 344, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.004 Wieczorek, 2013, A review of the European offshore wind innovation system, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 26, 294, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.045 Reichardt, 2016, How the policy mix impacts innovation: findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, 18, 62, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.001 Reichardt, 2016, Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 106, 11, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029 Graichen, 2016 Cooper, 2016, Renewable and distributed resources in a post-Paris low carbon future: the key role and political economy of sustainable electricity, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 19, 66, 10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.008 UNFCCC, 2016 Kivimaa, 2016, Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 45, 205, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 Rogge, 2015 Meadows, 1999 Frankfurt School and UNEP Centre/BNEF, 2016, 2016 OECD, System Innovation: Synthesis Report, Paris, 101 pp., (2015). https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/system-innovation-oecd-project . Raven, 2016, Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work: a meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, 18, 164, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002