A computational unification of cognitive behavior and emotion

Cognitive Systems Research - Tập 10 - Trang 48-69 - 2009
Robert P. Marinier1, John E. Laird1, Richard L. Lewis2
1University of Michigan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2260 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
2University of Michigan, Department of Psychology, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agre, P. (1988). The dynamic structure of everyday life. Dissertation, MIT, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cambridge. Anderson, 2007 Breazeal, 2003, Function meets style: Insights from emotion theory applied to HRI, IEEE Transactions in Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 34, 187, 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.826270 Damasio, 1994 Damasio, 2003 Ekman, 1987, Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 712, 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.712 Forgas, 1999, Network theories and beyond, 591 Frijda, 1989, Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212 Gratch, J., Marsella, S., & Mao, W. (2006). Towards a validated model of “Emotional Intelligence”. In 21st national conference on artificial intelligence. Boston: AAAI. Gratch, 2004, A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion, Cognitive Systems Research, 5, 269, 10.1016/j.cogsys.2004.02.002 Gross, 2003, Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348, 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 Hudlicka, E. (2004). Beyond Cognition: Modeling Emotion in Cognitive Architectures. In Proceedings of the international conference of cognitive modelling, ICCM 2004 (pp. 118–123). Pittsburgh, PA. Kieras, 1997, An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human–computer interaction, Human–Computer Interaction, 12, 391, 10.1207/s15327051hci1204_4 Laird, 2008, Extending the Soar cognitive architecture Marinier, R. (2008). A computational unification of cognitive control, emotion, and learning. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Marinier, 2007 Marinier, 2008 Marsella, 2009, EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics, Cognitive Systems Research, 10, 70, 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.005 Neal Reilly, W. S. (1996). Believable social and emotional agents. Technical Report CMU-CS-96-138, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Neal Reilly, 2006, Modeling what happens between emotional antecedents and emotional consequents, 607 Neumann, 2001, The causal influences of attributions on emotions: A procedural priming approach, Psychological Science, 11, 179, 10.1111/1467-9280.00238 Newell, 1990 Newell, 1960, Report on a general problem solving program, 256 Ortony, 1988 Parkinson, 2009, What holds emotions together? Meaning and response co-ordination, Cognitive Systems Research, 10, 31, 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.003 Picard, 1997 Reisenzein, 2009, Emotions as metarepresentational states of mind: Naturalizing the belief-desire theory of emotion, Cognitive Systems Research, 10, 6, 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.001 Roseman, 2001, Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties Rosenberg, 1998, Levels of analysis and the organization of affect, Review of General Psychology, 2, 247, 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.247 Scherer, 2001, Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking Schorr, 2001, Appraisal: The evolution of an idea, 20 Smith, 2001, Toward delivering on the promise of appraisal theory, 121 Smith, 1990, Emotion and adaptation, 609 Sun, 2006, The CLARION cognitive architecture: Extending cognitive modeling to social simulation Yik, 1999, Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 600, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.600 Zajonc, 1984, On the primacy of affect, American Psychologist, 39, 117, 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117