Why higher punishment may reduce deterrence

Economics Letters - Tập 104 - Trang 69-71 - 2009
Eberhard Feess1, Ansgar Wohlschlegel2
1Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Sonnemannstraße 9-11, D-60314 Frankfurt, Germany
2RWTH Aachen University, Department of Economics, Templergraben 64, D-52062 Aachen, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andreoni, 1991, Reasonable doubt and the optimal magnitude of fines: should the penalty fit the crime?, RAND Journal of Economics, 22, 385, 10.2307/2601054 Becker, 1968, Crime and punishment: an economic approach, Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169, 10.1086/259394 Feddersen, 1998, Convicting the innocent: the inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting, American Political Science Review, 92, 23, 10.2307/2585926 Garoupa, N., 2003. An Economic Analysis of Criminal Law. mimeo. Malik, 1990, Avoidance, screening and optimum enforcement, RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 341, 10.2307/2555613 Michael, 1937, A rationale of the law of homicide II, Columbia Law Review, 37, 1261, 10.2307/1116597 Polinsky, 1979, The optimal tradeoff between the probability and magnitude of fines, American Economic Review, 69, 880 Polinsky, 2001, Legal error, litigation, and the incentive to obey the law, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 5, 99 Rubinfeld, 1987, Efficient awards and standards of proof in judicial proceedings, RAND Journal of Economics, 18, 308, 10.2307/2555555 Shavell, 1987, The optimal use of nonmonetary sanctions as a deterrent, American Economic Review, 77, 584 Shavell, 1991, Specific versus general enforcement of law, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 1088, 10.1086/261790 Shavell, 1992, A note on marginal deterrence, International Review of Law and Economics, 12, 133 Stigler, 1970, The optimum enforcement of laws, Journal of Political Economy, 78, 526, 10.1086/259646