Design process outputs as boundary objects in agricultural innovation projects: Functions and limitations

Backman, 2006, Vehicles for attention creation: the case of a concept car at Volvo Cars, Eur. J. Innov. Manage., 9, 149, 10.1108/14601060610663541 Beers, 2010, Future sustainability and images, Futures, 42, 723, 10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.017 Bergman, 2007, Boundary objects in design: an ecological view of design artifacts, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 8, 546 Berkhout, 2006, Normative expectations in systems innovation, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manage., 18, 299, 10.1080/09537320600777010 Bessant, 2009, Developing radical service innovations in healthcare – the role of design methods, Int. J. Innov. Manage., 13, 555, 10.1142/S1363919609002418 Boon, 2008, Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors - A study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics, Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1915, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.012 Bos, B., 2009. Concepts and objects as boundary objects for sustainable animal husbandry. Anticipating regime transformations by design. In: Paper Presented at KSI Conference 2009, June 4–6, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Bos, 2009, Reflexive interactive design and its application in a project on sustainable dairy husbandry systems, Outlook Agric., 38, 137, 10.5367/000000009788632386 Bowker, 2000, Invisible mediators of action: classification and the ubiquity of standards, Mind Cult. Act., 7, 147, 10.1080/10749039.2000.9677652 Broberg, 2011, Participatory ergonomics in design processes: the role of boundary objects, Appl. Ergon., 42, 464, 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.006 Carlile, P.R., 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Org. Sci. 13, 442–455+456. Cerf, M., Jeuffroy, M.H., Prost, L., Meynard, J.M., in press. Participatory design of agricultural decision support tools: taking account of the use situations. Agron. Sustain. Dev. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0091-z. De Lauwere, C., Luttik, J., Groot Koerkamp, P., 2004. Houden van Hennen, op naar gelukkige kippen, trotse boeren en tevreden burgers. Wageningen University and Research Centre. Retrievable trough http://edepot.wur.nl/31373. Douthwaite, 2001, Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption, Res. Policy, 30, 819, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00124-4 Eastwood, 2012, Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: Case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia, Agric. Syst., 108, 10, 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.005 Elzen, 2005, Transitions towards sustainability through system innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 72, 651, 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.04.002 Ewenstein, 2009, Knowledge practices in design: the role of visual representations as ‘Epistemic objects’, Org. Stud., 30, 7, 10.1177/0170840608083014 Fleischmann, 2006, Boundary objects with agency: a method for studying the design-use interface, Inf. Soc., 22, 77, 10.1080/01972240600567188 Flyvbjerg, 2006, Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qual. Inq., 12, 219, 10.1177/1077800405284363 Grin, 2004, Practices for reflexive design: lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agriculture, Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy, 1, 126, 10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004618 Groot Koerkamp, 2008, Designing complex and sustainable agricultural production systems: an integrated and reflexive approach for the case of table egg production in the Netherlands, NJAS – Wageningen J. Life Sci., 55, 113, 10.1016/S1573-5214(08)80032-2 Harrison, D., Prenkert, F., Olsen, P.I., Hoholm, T., 2011. Boundary Objects in Multi-actor Interactions within Tightly Structured Networks. Paper presented at the 27th IMP-conference in Glasgow, Scotland. Huzzard, 2010, Constructing interorganizational collaboration: the action researcher as boundary subject, Action Res., 8, 293, 10.1177/1476750309335206 Jakku, 2010, A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems, Agric. Syst., 103, 675, 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.08.007 Kash, 2002, Emerging patterns of complex technological innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 69, 581, 10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00171-8 Kimble, 2010, Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: political interplay between boundary objects and brokers, Int. J. Inf. Manage., 30, 437, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.002 Klerkx, 2010, Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment, Agric. Syst., 103, 390, 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012 Kristjanson, 2009, Linking international agricultural research knowledge with action for sustainable development, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 9, 5047, 10.1073/pnas.0807414106 Kropff, 2001, Systems approaches for the design of sustainable agro-ecosystems, Agric. Syst., 70, 369, 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00052-X Le Gal, 2011, How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review, Agric. Syst., 104, 714, 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.07.007 Leeuwis, 1999, Integral technology design as a process of learning and negotiation. A social science perspective on interactive prototyping, 123 Lettl, 2007, User involvement competence for radical innovation, J. Eng. Tech. Manage., 24, 53, 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004 Martin, 2012, Forage rummy: a game to support the participatory design of adapted livestock systems, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 1442, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.013 McCown, 2002, Changing systems for supporting farmers’ decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects, Agric. Syst., 74, 179, 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00026-4 Meyer, 2009, Boundary object or boundary project? Construction, (non-)utilisation and politics of a database, Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 3, 127, 10.3917/rac.006.0127 Montagna, 2011, Decision-aiding tools in innovative product development contexts, Res. Eng. Des., 22, 63, 10.1007/s00163-011-0103-z Mørk, 2012, Changing practice through boundary organizing: A case from medical R&D, Hum. Relat., 65, 263, 10.1177/0018726711429192 Nahuis, 2012, User producer interaction in context, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 79, 1121, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.005 Papadimitriou, 2007, Dynamics of a project through intermediary objects of design (IODs): a sensemaking perspective, Int. J. Project Manage., 25, 437, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.002 Plowman, 2007, Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change, Acad. Manage. J. (AMJ), 50, 515, 10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525647 Rains, 2011, Redirecting technology to support sustainable farm management practices, Agric. Syst., 104, 365, 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.12.008 Schut, 2010, Biofuel developments in Mozambique. Update and analysis of policy, potential and reality, Energy Policy, 38, 5151, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.048 Star, 1989, Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1930, Soc. Stud. Sci., 19, 387, 10.1177/030631289019003001 Sterk, 2006, Finding niches for whole-farm design models – contradictio in terminis?, Agric. Syst., 87, 211, 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.11.008 Sterk, 2009, The interface between land use systems research and policy: multiple arrangements and leverages, Land Use Policy, 26, 434, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.003 Sterk, 2009, Land use models in complex societal problem solving: plug and play or networking?, Environ. Model. Softw., 24, 165, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.07.001 Sumberg, 2004, Agricultural research through a new product development lens, Exp. Agric., 40, 295, 10.1017/S0014479704002030 Sumberg, 2003, Agricultural research in the face of diversity, local knowledge and the participation imperative: theoretical considerations, Agric. Syst., 76, 739, 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00153-1 Swan, 2007, The object of knowledge: the role of objects in biomedical innovation, Human Relations, 60, 1809, 10.1177/0018726707084915 Thorburn, 2011, Agricultural decision support systems facilitating co-learning: a case study on environmental impacts of sugarcane production, Int. J. Agric. Sustain., 9, 322, 10.1080/14735903.2011.582359 Turnhout, 2009, The effectiveness of boundary objects: the case of ecological indicators, Sci. Public Policy, 36, 403, 10.3152/030234209X442007 Ulrich, 2004 Van de Ven, 1999 van Ittersum, 1998, Exploratory land use studies and their role in strategic policy making, Agric. Syst., 58, 309, 10.1016/S0308-521X(98)00033-X van Mierlo, 2010, Enhancing the reflexivity of system innovation projects with system analyses, Am. J. Eval., 31, 143, 10.1177/1098214010366046 von Hippel, 2005, Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation, J. fur Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 63, 10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8 Wiskerke, 2007, Constructing a sustainable pork supply chain: a case of techno-institutional innovation, J. Environ. Planning Policy Manage., 9, 53, 10.1080/15239080701254982 Yin, 2003 Zeiss, 2009, Engaging boundary objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the subtleties of layered engagement, Organization, 16, 81, 10.1177/1350508408098923