Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling

Personality and Individual Differences - Tập 42 - Trang 893-898 - 2007
James H. Steiger1
1Department of Psychology and Human Development, Box 512, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barrett, 2007, Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit, Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018 Cliff, 1983, Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115, 10.1207/s15327906mbr1801_7 Guttman, 1954, A new approach to factor analysis: the radex Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: the stability of a bi-factor solution. In Supplementary Educational Monograph No. 48 (p. 91). Chicago: University of Chicago Department of Education. Hu, 1999, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1, 10.1080/10705519909540118 Jöreskog, 1978, Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices, Psychometrika, 43, 443, 10.1007/BF02293808 MacCallum, 1996, Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling, Psychological Methods, 1, 130, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 Marsh, 2005, Goodness of fit in structural equation models Serlin, 1993, Rational appraisal of psychological research and the good-enough principle, 199 Smithson, 2001, Correct confidence intervals for various regression effect sizes and parameters: the importance of noncentral distributions in computing intervals, Educational Psychological Measurement, 61, 603, 10.1177/00131640121971392 Steiger, 2000, Point estimation, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA: some comments and a reply to Hayduk and Glaser, Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 149, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_1 Steiger, 2004, Beyond the F-test: effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis, Psychological Methods, 9, 164, 10.1037/1082-989X.9.2.164 Steiger, J. H. (2006). Things we could have known: some thoughts on seeing the future and avoiding regret in data analysis and model selection. Keynote address at the annual international meeting of the psychometric society, Montreal, June 14, 2006. Steiger, 1997, Noncentrality interval estimation and the evaluation of statistical models Steiger, J.H.,& Lind, J.C. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual spring meeting of the psychometric society in Iowa city. May 30, 1980. Tucker, 1973, A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis, Psychometrika, 38, 1, 10.1007/BF02291170 Westlake, 1976, Symmetrical confidence intervals for bioequivalence trials, Biometrics, 32, 741, 10.2307/2529259