The overshadowing of background stimuli by an informative CS in aversive Pavlovian conditioning with rats

F. John Odling-Smee1
1Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, England

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Benedict, I. O., &Ayres, J. J. B. Factors affecting conditioning in the truly random control procedure in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,78, 323–330.

Champion, R. A. Stimulus-intensity effects in response evocation.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 428–449.

Dweck, C. S., &Wagner, A. R. Situational cues and correlation between CS and US as determinants of the conditioned emotional response.Psychonomic Science, 1970,18, 145–147.

Kamin, L. I. Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. Campbell & R. Church (Eds.),Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.

Kremer, E. F. The truly random control procedure: Conditioning to the static cues.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,86, 700–707.

Logan, F. A., &Wagner, A. R. Supplementary report: Direction of change in CS in eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 325–326.

Lubow, R. E. Latent inhibition.Psychological Bulletin, 1973,79, 398–407.

Lubow, R. E., Rifkin, B., &Alek, M. The context effect: The relationship between stimulus pre-exposure and environmental pre-exposure determines subsequent learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,1, 38–47.

Mackintosh, N. J. A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 276–298.

Mackintosh, N. J. Overshadowing and stimulus intensity.Animal Learning and Behavior, 1976,4, 186–192.

McHose, J. H., &Moore, I. N. Expectancy, salience, and habit: A noncontextual interpretation of the effects of changes in the conditions of reinforcement on simple instrumental responses.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 292–307.

Myers, A. K. Onset vs. termination of stimulus energy as the CS in avoidance conditioning and pseudoconditioning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1960,53, 72–78.

Odling-Smee, F. J. The role of background stimuli during Pavlovian conditioning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 201–209. (a)

Odling-Smee, F. J. Background stimuli and the inter-stimulus interval during Pavlovian conditioning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 387–392. (b)

Rescorla, R. A. Configurai conditioning in discrete trial bar pressing.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,79, 307–317.

Rescorla, R. A. Evidence for “unique stimulus” account of configurai conditioning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,85, 331–338.

Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.

Sutherland, N. S., &Mackintosh, N. J. Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

Tomie, A. Interference with autoshaping by prior context conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 323–334.

Welker, R. L., Tomie, A., Davitt, G. A., &Thomas, D. R. Contextual stimulus control over operant responding in pigeons.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,86, 549–562.