Design displacement for lifelines at fault crossings: the code-based approach for Europe
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering - Trang 1-45 - 2023
Tóm tắt
The earthquake-resistant design of lifelines, such as pipelines, tunnels and bridges, is based on the reliable representation and estimation of the seismic loading. In the case of lifeline–fault crossings, the design fault displacement is typically derived from estimates based on fault dimensions via empirical fault scaling relations for a given “design” scenario event. This approach comes with an unknown level of safety because the fault productivity and the actual distribution of earthquake events are essentially disregarded. To overcome this challenge, a simplified approach is proposed by statistically analyzing the outcome of probabilistic fault displacement hazard analyses (PFDHAs). A selection of faults from the 2020 European Fault-Source Model is used to build the logic tree and to set the range of parameters considered in the PFDHAs. The methodology allows the (mostly conservative) approximation of the fault displacement corresponding to any given return period based on readily available data, namely fault productivity, fault mechanism, fault length, and lifeline crossing location on the fault. The proposed methodology has been proposed and adopted as an informative Annex in prEN 1998-4:2022.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aki K, Richards P (1980) Quantitative seismology: theory and methods. W. H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco
Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G (2007) Foundation–structure systems over a rupturing normal fault: part I. Observations after the Kocaeli 1999 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 5:253–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9029-2
Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G, Bransby MF et al (2007) Fault rupture propagation through sand: finite-element analysis and validation through centrifuge experiments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(8):943–958. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:8(943)
Anastasopoulos I, Gerolymos N, Gazetas G, Bransby MF (2008) Simplified approach for design of raft foundations against fault rupture. Part I: free-field. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 7:147–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-0835-6
Basili R, Danciu L, Beauval C, et al (2022) European Fault-Source Model 2020 (EFSM20): online data on fault geometry and activity parameters. Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.13127/efsm20
Basöz NI, Kiremidjian AS, King SA, Law KH (1999) Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 15:25–54. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586027
Bird JF, Bommer JJ (2004) Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Eng Geol 75(2):147–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.05.006
Bommer JJ (2002) Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: an exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy. J Earthq Eng 6:43–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460209350432
Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F (2008) The use and misuse of logic trees in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthq Spectra 24(4):997–1009. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2977755
Casari M, Wilkie SJ (2005) Sequencing lifeline repairs after an earthquake: an economic approach. J Regul Econ 27:47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-004-4418-9
Cornell CA, Krawinkler H (2000) Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 3:1–4
Danciu L, Nandan S, Reyes C, et al (2021) The 2020 update of the European Seismic Hazard Model—ESHM20: Model Overview. EFEHR Technical Report 001 v1.0.0. Zurich, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.12686/a15
Davis CA (2008) Assessing geotechnical hazards for water pipes with uniform confidence level. In: Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40975(318)194
European Committee for Standardisation (2021) EN 1998-1-1:2021, Eurocode 8: earthquake resistance design of structures—part 1–1: general rules and seismic action. Belgium, Brussels
European Committee for Standardisation (2022) prEN 1998–4:2022, Eurocode 8—design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 4: silos, tanks and pipelines, towers, masts and chimneys. Belgium, Brussels
Fragiadakis M, Vamvatsikos D, Karlaftis MG et al (2015) Seismic assessment of structures and lifelines. J Sound Vib 334(6):29–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.12.031
Gao JC, Chan CH, Ma KF, Lee CT (2022) Probabilistic fault displacement hazards along the milun fault. Bull Seismol Soc Am 112(5):2745–2757. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210312
Girgin S, Krausmann E (2016) Historical analysis of U.S. onshore hazardous liquid pipeline accidents triggered by natural hazards. J Loss Prev Process Ind 40:578–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.02.008
Gutenberg R, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:185–188. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185
Hamid-Mosaku IA, Oguntade OF, Ifeanyi VI et al (2020) Evolving a comprehensive geomatics multi-criteria evaluation index model for optimal pipeline route selection. Struct Infrastruct Eng 16(10):1382–1396. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1712435
Haver S, Winterstein SR (2009) Environmental contour lines: a method for estimating long term extremes by a short term analysis. Trans Soc Naval Archit Mar Eng 116:116–127
Honegger DG, Nyman DJ, Johnson ER et al (2004) Trans-Alaska pipeline system performance in the 2002 Denali fault, Alaska, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20(3):707–738. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1779239
Kilanitis I, Sextos A (2019) Integrated seismic risk and resilience assessment of roadway networks in earthquake prone areas. Bull Earthq Eng 17:181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0457-y
Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Leonard M (2014) Self-consistent earthquake fault-scaling relations: update and extension to stable continental strike-slip faults. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(6):2953–2965. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140087
Loukidis D, Bouckovalas GD, Papadimitriou AG (2009) Analysis of fault rupture propagation through uniform soil cover. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(11–12):1389–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.04.003
Mackay DJC (2005) Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mazumder RK, Salman AM, Li Y, Yu X (2020) Seismic functionality and resilience analysis of water distribution systems. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 11(1):04019045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000418
Melissianos VE, Vamvatsikos D, Gantes CJ (2017) Performance assessment of buried pipelines at fault crossings. Earthq Spectra 33(1):201–218. https://doi.org/10.1193/122015EQS187M
Melissianos VE, Danciu L, Vamvatsikos D, Basili R (2023) Fault displacement hazard estimation at lifeline–fault crossings: a simplified approach for engineering applications. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01710-1
Moss RES, Ross ZE (2011) Probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis for reverse faults. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1542–1553. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100248
Nair GS, Dash SR, Mondal G (2018) Review of pipeline performance during earthquakes since 1906. J Perform Constr Facil 32(6):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001214
O’Rourke TD (2010) Geohazards and large, geographically distributed systems. Geotechnique 60:505–543. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2010.60.7.505
O’Rourke TD, Jeon SS, Toprak S et al (2014) Earthquake response of underground pipeline networks in Christchurch, NZ. Earthq Spectra 30(1):183–204. https://doi.org/10.1193/030413EQS062M
O’Rourke MJ, Liu JX (2012) Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines. Monograph MCEER-12-MN04. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, USA
Petersen MD, Dawson TE, Chen R et al (2011) Fault displacement hazard for strike-slip faults. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(2):805–825. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100035
Roy N, Sarkar R (2017) A Review of seismic damage of mountain tunnels and probable failure mechanisms. Geotech Geol Eng 35:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0091-x
Seel K, Dragan M, Coulombe-Pontbriand M, et al (2014) A spatial multi-criteria analysis process to optimize and better defend the pipeline route selection process. In: Proceedings of the 10th international pipeline conference. American society of mechanical engineers, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, p IPC201433221. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2014-33221
Somerville P (1995) Kobe earthquake: an urban disaster. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 76:49–51. https://doi.org/10.1029/EO076i006p00049-02
Steinberg LJ, Cruz AM (2004) When natural and technological disasters collide: lessons from the Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999. Nat Hazards Rev 5:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2004)5:3(121)
Valentini A, Fukushima Y, Contri P et al (2021) Probabilistic fault displacement hazard assessment (PFDHA) for nuclear installations according to IAEA safety standards. Bull Seismol Soc Am 111(5):2661–2672. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210083
Wang JH (2018) A review on scaling of earthquake faults. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 29:589–610. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2018.08.19.01
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacements. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0840040974
Yang S, Mavroeidis GP (2018) Bridges crossing fault rupture zones: a review. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 113:545–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.027
Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1986) Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 23:125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(86)90651-0
Youngs RR, Arabasz WJ, Anderson RE et al (2003) A methodology for probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis (PFDHA). Earthq Spectra 19(1):191–219. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1542891