Gender-based vulnerability: combining Pareto ranking and spatial statistics to model gender-based vulnerability in Rohingya refugee settlements in Bangladesh

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 19 - Trang 1-14 - 2020
Erica L. Nelson1,2, Daniela Reyes Saade3, P. Gregg Greenough1,2,4
1Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Global Emergency Care and Humanitarian Studies, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA
3Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, USA
4Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA

Tóm tắt

The Rohingya refugee crisis in Bangladesh continues to outstrip humanitarian resources and undermine the health and security of over 900,000 people. Spatial, sector-specific information is required to better understand the needs of vulnerable populations, such as women and girls, and to target interventions with improved efficiency and effectiveness. This study aimed to create a gender-based vulnerability index and explore the geospatial and thematic variations in gender-based vulnerability of Rohingya refugees residing in Bangladesh by utilizing pre-existing, open source data. Data sources included remotely-sensed REACH data on humanitarian infrastructure, United Nations Population Fund resource availability data, and the Needs and Population Monitoring Survey conducted by the International Organization for Migration in October 2017. Data gaps were addressed through probabilistic interpolation. A vulnerability index was designed through a process of literature review, variable selection and thematic grouping, normalization, and scorecard creation, and Pareto ranking was employed to rank sites based on vulnerability scoring. Spatial autocorrelation of vulnerability was analyzed with the Global and Anselin Local Moran’s I applied to both combined vulnerability index rank and disaggregated thematic ranking. Of the settlements, 24.1% were ranked as ‘most vulnerable,’ with 30 highly vulnerable clusters identified predominantly in the northwest region of metropolitan Cox’s Bazar. Five settlements in Dhokkin, Somitapara, and Pahartoli were categorized as less vulnerable outliers amongst highly vulnerable neighboring sites. Security- and health-related variables appear to be the most significant drivers of gender-specific vulnerability in Cox’s Bazar. Clusters of low security and education vulnerability measures are shown near Kutupalong. The humanitarian sector produces tremendous amounts of data that can be analyzed with spatial statistics to improve research targeting and programmatic intervention. The critical utilization of these data and the validation of vulnerability indexes are required to improve the international response to the global refugee crisis. This study presents a novel methodology that can be utilized to not only spatially characterize gender-based vulnerability in refugee populations, but can also be calibrated to identify and serve other vulnerable populations during crises.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Medecins Sans Frontieres. Timeline: a visual history of the Rohingya refugee crisis. Doctors without Borders, USA. 2019. https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/what-we-do/news-stories/news/timeline-visual-history-rohingya-refugee-crisis. Accessed 22 Nov 2019. Assessment Capacities Project. Rohingya influx since 1978: Background on the context in Bangladesh. 2017. https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/historical-review-rohingya-influx-1978. Accessed 11 Nov 2019 cited 2019. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Rohingya Refugee Crisis. https://www.unocha.org/rohingya-refugee-crisis. Accessed 11 Nov 2019. Sang D. One year on: time to put women and girls at the heart of the Rohingya response. 2018. https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/one-year-time-put-women-and-girls-heart-rohingya-response. Accessed 9 Oct 2019. UN Women. Gender Brief on Rohingya Refugee Crisis Response in Bangladesh. In: UN Women—Asia-Pacific. 2018. https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2017/10/gender-brief-on-rohingya-refugee-crisis. Accessed 22 Nov 2019. Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crisis. Women and girls critically underserved in the Rohingya Humanitarian Response. 2018. http://iawg.net/resource/women-girls-critically-underserved-rohingya-humanitarian-response/. Accessed 9 Oct 2019. World Food Programme. Rohingya Emergency Vulnerability Assessment (REVA) –Summary Report. 2017. https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/WFP-0000050429/download/?_ga=2.5768243.1666492886.1580884116-445744275.1580884116. Accessed 20 Sept 2019. Toma I, Chowdhury M, Laiju M, Gora N, Padamada N. Rohingya Refugee Response Gender Analysis: Recognizing and responding to gender inequalities. 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10546/620528. Accessed 9 Oct 2019. Women’s Refugee Commission. “We Need to Write Our Own Names”: Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in the Rohingya Humanitarian Response in Cox’s Bazar: Gender Operational Review Report. 2019. https://www.womensrefugeecommission.org/resources/233-gender-issues/1828-we-need-to-write-our-own-names-gender-equality-and-women-s-empowerment-in-the-rohingya-humanitarian-response-in-cox-s-bazar. Accessed 9 Oct 2019. Financial Tracking Service. Bangladesh: Rohingya Refugee Crisis Joint Response Plan 2018. https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/656/summary. Accessed 22 Nov 2019. International Federation of the Red Cross: what is vulnerability? 2019. https://www.ifrc.org/en/what-we-do/disaster-management/about-disasters/what-is-a-disaster/what-is-vulnerability/. Accessed 11 Nov 2019. Dickin SK, Schuster-Wallace CJ, Elliott SJ. Developing a vulnerability mapping methodology: applying the Water-Associated Disease Index to Dengue in Malaysia. PLoS One. 2013;8(5). Bizimana JP, Twarabamenye E, Kienberger S. Assessing the social vulnerability to malaria in Rwanda. Malar J. 2015;14(1):2. Nayak SG, Shrestha S, Kinney PL, Ross Z, Sheridan SC, Pantea CI, et al. Development of a heat vulnerability index for New York State. Public Health. 2018;1(161):127–37. Shrestha R, Flacke J, Martinez J, Van Maarseveen M. Environmental health related socio-spatial inequalities: Identifying “hotspots” of environmental burdens and social vulnerability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(7):691. Flanagan B, Hallisey E, Adams E, Lavery A. Measuring community vulnerability to natural and anthropogenic hazards: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s social vulnerability index. J Environ Health. 2018;80(10):34–6. Sankari TS, Chandramouli AR, Gokul K, Surya SSM, Saravanavel J. Coastal vulnerability mapping using geospatial technologies in Cuddalore-Pichavaram Coastal Tract, Tamil Nadu, India. Aquat Procedia. 2015;4:412–8. Chan EYY, Huang Z, Lam HCY, Wong CKP, Zou Q. Health vulnerability index for disaster risk reduction: application in belt and road initiative (BRI) region. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(3):380. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Vulnerability Assessment Framework—Population Study 2019—Jordan. Found in: ReliefWeb. 2019. https://reliefweb.int/report/jordan/vulnerability-assessment-framework-population-study-2019. Accessed 22 Nov 2019. Alam MB, Rahman KMA. Women and climate change in Bangladesh: an analysis from gender perspective. Cross Cult Comm. 2017;13(8):7–9. Sugden F, De Silva S, Clement F, Maskey-Amatya N, Ramesh V, Philip A, et al. A framework to understand gender and structural vulnerability to climate change in the ganges river basin: lessons from Bangladesh, India and Nepal. Colombo: International Water Management Institute; 2014. p. 159. Pandey R, Jha SK. Climate vulnerability index—measure of climate change vulnerability to communities: a case of rural Lower Himalaya, India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2012;17(5):487–506. Humanitarian Data Exchange: Welcome page. https://data.humdata.org/. Accessed 23 Oct 2019. Adams L. Sixth Annual Health Data Liberator Award honors work to increase use and impact of humanitarian data. In: AcademyHealth. 2018. https://www.academyhealth.org/blog/2018-04/sixth-annual-health-data-liberator-award-honors-work-increase-use-and-impact-humanitarian-data. Accessed 11 Nov 2019. International Organization for Migration (IOM) Bangladesh, Displacement Tracking Matrix- Needs and Population Monitoring (NPM) Round 6 Site Assessment. In: Humanitarian Data Exchange. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/needs-and-population-monitoring-npm-round-6-for-rohingya-population-in-cox-s-bazar-district. Accessed 12 Jan 2018. REACH Initiative. Health facilities in Rohingya refugee sites [XLSX file]. 2017. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/reach-bangladesh-who-health-services. REACH Initiative. Cox’s Bazar Refugee Settlement Health Facilities [geodatabase]. 2018. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cox-s-bazar-refugee-settlement-health-facilities. REACH Initiative. Health facilities in Rohingya refugee sites of Ukhia and Teknaf Upazilas [XLSX file]. 2017. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/health-facilities-within-camp-areas-in-rohingya-refugee-sites-in-ukhia-and-teknaf-upazilas/resource/29d91dd7-2a5d-4626-b18d-245af1002630. REACH Initiative. Cox’s Bazar refugee settlement learning centers [XLSX file]. 2018. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cox-s-bazar-refugee-settlement-learning-centers. REACH Initiative. Cox’s Bazar refugee settlement nutritional services [XLSX file]. 2017. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cbd47cfc-e459-43de-93b6-d6950ef0d5d4/resource/77c28600-447b-4d21-b581-bc5d6bc044d4. REACH Initiative. Cox’s Bazar refugee settlement women friendly spaces [XLSX file]. 2017. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/health-facilities-within-camp-areas-in-rohingya-refugee-sites-in-ukhia-and-teknaf-upazilas. United Nations Population Fund. Bangladesh- Health and nutrition centre for Rohingya refugees and host communities in Cox’s Bazar [geodatabase]. 2017. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/bangladesh-health-and-nutrition-centre-for-rohingya-refugees-and-host-commuities-in-cox-s-bazar. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. Paris: France; 2008. United Nations Population Fund. Women and girls safe spaces: A guidance note based on lessons learned from the Syrian crisis. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/UNFPA%20UNFPA%20Women%20and%20Girls%20Safe%20Spaces%20Guidance%20%5B1%5D.pdf. Liley S, Metzler J, and Ager A. Evaluation of child friendly spaces: Tools and guidance for monitoring and evaluating CFS. World Vision Inc., 2015. https://www.wvi.org/sites/default/files/Guidance%20for%20CFS%20M&E_2.pdf. Al Nahian M, Islam T, Bala SK. A new approach in gender vulnerability assessment using matrix framework. 2012. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303666930_A_NEW_APPROACH_IN_GENDER_VULNERABILITY_ASSESSMENT_USING_MATRIX_FRAMEWORK. Accessed 11 Nov 2019. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Social Institutions and Gender Index. https://www.genderindex.org. Accessed 25 Nov 2019. United Nations Development Programme. Gender Inequality Index (GII). In: Human Development Reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii. Accessed 25 Nov 2019. World Economic Forum. The global gender gap report 2018 insight report. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2018. Plan International India. Plan for every child: gender vulnerability index report—1. India: New Delhi; 2018. p. 1–96. Posa D. The indicator formalism in spatial statistics. J Appl Stats. 1992;19(1):83–104. Alkire S, Friedman M, Robles Aguilar G, Valenti S, Santos ME. UNDP Human Development Report Office Training Material for Producing National Human Development Reports. March 2015. Adger N, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S. New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. Technical report 7. Norwich, England. 2004. Rygel L, O’Sullivan D, Yarnal B. A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2006;11(3):741–64. Jerrett M, Gale S, Kontgis C. Spatial modeling in environmental and public health research. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2010;7:1302–29. Rushton G. Public health, GIS, and spatial analytic tools. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:43–56. Scribner RA, Simonsen NR, Leonardi C. The Social determinants of health core: taking a place-based approach. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(1):S13–9. Getis A, Ord JK. The analysis of spatial association. Geogr Anal. 1992;24(3):189–206. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geogr Anal. 2010;27(2):93–115. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Camp profiles- Rohingya refugee response. 2019. https://reliefweb.int/map/bangladesh/camp-profiles-december-2019-rohingya-refugee-response-bangladesh. Accessed 20 Sep 2019. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Designing appropriate interventions in urban settings: Health, education, livelihoods, and registration for urban refugees and returnees. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; 2009. Tay AK, Islam R, Riley A, Welton-Mitchell C, Duchesne B, Waters V, et al. Culture, context and mental health of Rohingya refugees: a review for staff in mental health and psychosocial support programmes for Rohingya refugees. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; 2018. Data Policy. In: The Centre for Humanitarian Data. https://centre.humdata.org/data-policy/. Accessed 3 Dec 2019.