Preoperative elevation of carcinoembryonic antigen predicts poor tumor response and frequent distant recurrence for patients with rectal cancer who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision: a multi-institutional analysis in an Asian population

International Journal of Colorectal Disease - Tập 28 - Trang 511-517 - 2012
Jong Hoon Lee1, Sung Hwan Kim1, Hong Seok Jang2, Hyuk Jun Chung3, Seong Taek Oh3, Doo Seok Lee4, Jun-Gi Kim3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
3Department of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
4Department of Colorectal Surgery, Daehang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

Tóm tắt

This study was conducted to evaluate the significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level as a predictor for tumor response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and a prognosticator for survival in Asian patients with advanced rectal cancer. We enrolled 345 patients with primary rectal cancer who had undergone preoperative CRT and total mesorectal excision. We analyzed clinicopathological factors that could be associated with pathologically complete response (ypCR) and disease-free survival (DFS). A cutoff level of 5 ng/mL (p = 0.002) for CEA was found to be significant for prediction of ypCR. Increased CEA level (p = 0.025) was a significant negative predictor of ypCR after CRT in patients with rectal cancer. The 5-year DFS rate was significantly higher in the CEA ≤5-ng/mL group than in the CEA >5-ng/mL group (73.2 vs. 60.9 %, p = 0.002). This is mainly due to the higher chance of distant recurrence (p = 0.013), not locoregional recurrence (p = 0.732), in the CEA >5-ng/mL group. Elevated CEA (>5 ng/mL) is a negative predictor of ypCR and has a negative impact on DFS in Asian rectal cancer patients who underwent preoperative CRT and surgery due to an increased chance of distant recurrences.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Jung KW, Park S, Kong HJ et al (2011) Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2009. Cancer Res Treat 44:11–24 Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740 Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G et al (2006) Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1114–1123 Lee JH, Kim SH, Kim JG et al (2011) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: predictors of the tumor response and the long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:431–438 Rodel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T et al (2005) Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8688–8696 Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J et al (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5313–5327 Das P, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA et al (2007) Predictors of tumor response and downstaging in patients who receive preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Cancer 109:1750–1755 Yoon SM, Kim DY, Kim TH et al (2007) Clinical parameters predicting pathologic tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:1167–1172 Giralt J, Eraso A, Armengol M et al (2002) Epidermal growth factor receptor is a predictor of tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:1460–1465 Zlobec I, Steele R, Compton CC (2005) VEGF as a predictive marker of rectal tumor response to preoperative radiotherapy. Cancer 104:2517–2521 Chang HJ, Jung KH, Kim DY et al (2005) Bax, a predictive marker for therapeutic response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal carcinoma. Hum Pathol 36:364–371 Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (2009) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York Park YA, Sohn SK, Seong J et al (2006) Serum CEA as a predictor for the response to preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 93:145–150 Kim YW, Kim NK, Min BS et al (2009) Factors associated with anastomotic recurrence after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 99:58–64 Park JW, Lim SB, Kim DY et al (2009) Carcinoembryonic antigen as a predictor of pathologic response and a prognostic factor in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:810–817 Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312 Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S et al (2010) Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol 28:1638–1644 Lee JH, Kim DY, Nam TK et al (2012) Long-term follow-up of preoperative pelvic radiation therapy and concomitant boost irradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a multi-institutional phase II study (KROG 04-01). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:955–961 Kim CJ, Yeatman TJ, Coppola D et al (2001) Local excision of T2 and T3 rectal cancers after downstaging chemoradiation. Ann Surg 234:352–358 Schell SR, Zlotecki RA, Mendenhall WM et al (2002) Transanal excision of locally advanced rectal cancers downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Am Coll Surg 194:584–590 Lee JH, Jang HS, Kim JG et al (2012) Lymphovascular invasion is a significant prognosticator in rectal cancer patients who receive pre-operative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1213–1221 Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:19–23