Towards supervisory risk control of autonomous ships

Reliability Engineering & System Safety - Tập 196 - Trang 106757 - 2020
Ingrid Bouwer Utne1,2, Børge Rokseth1,2, Asgeir J. Sørensen1,2, Jan Erik Vinnem2
1Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems (NTNU AMOS), NTNU, Norway
2Department of Marine Technology, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

Tài liệu tham khảo

DNVGL, 2018. Remote-controlled and autonomous ships, DNVGL group technology & research, position paper 2018 in the maritime industry. https://www.dnvgl.com/maritime/publications/remote-controlled-autonomous-ships-paper-download.html. Danish Maritime Authority (DMA), 2017. Analysis of regulatory barriers to the use of autonomous ships. Final Report, Rambøll, Core, Denmark. 2015 Department for Transport, 2019. Maritime 2050. Navigating for the Future. Report, OGL, London, UK. Wrobel, 2017, Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 165, 155, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.029 IMO: International Maritime Organization, 2016. Seafarers rights 2016. Deaths and injuries at sea. http://seafarersrights.org/seafarers-subjects/deaths-and-injuries-at-sea/ (Accessed: 2017-05-12). Norwegian Maritime Authority (NMA), 2018. Requirements to documentation for constructing autonomous, unmanned and/or remotely operated vessels. Guidelines, Draft, Norway. (In Norwegian: Krav til dokumentasjon i forbindelse med bygging av autonome, ubemannede og/eller fjernstyrte fartøy). Ludvigsen, 2016, Towards integrated autonomous underwater operations for ocean mapping and monitoring, IFAC J Ann Rev Control, 42, 145, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.09.013 Utne, 2017, Risk management of autonomous marine operations and systems Vagia, 2016, A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed?, Appl Ergon, 53, 190, 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.013 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 2008. Autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS) Framework. Volume I: Terminlogy, version 2.0, NIST Special Publication 1011-I-2.0. 2017, Definitions for autonomous merchant ships, Draft. Rausand, 2011 2018 Sotiralis, 2016, Inforporation of human factos into ship collision risk models focusing on human centered design aspects, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 156, 210, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.007 Vinnem, 2015, On the need for online decision support in FPSO-shuttle tanker collision risk reduction, Ocean Eng, 101, 109, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.008 Thieme, 2017, A risk model for autonomous marine systems and operation focucing on human-autonomoy collaboration, 231, 446 Brito, 2016, A Bayesian approach for predicting risk of autonomous underwater vehicle loss during their missions, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 146, 55, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.10.004 Hegde, 2018, A Bayesian approach to risk modeling of autonomous subsea intervention operations, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 175, 142, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.019 Rødseth Ø.J., Tjora Å., 2015. A risk-based approach to the design of unmanned ship control systems. Maritime-Port Technology and Development – Ehlers et al. (Eds). Taylor & Francis Group, London. Acanfora, 2018, Toward a method for detecting large roll motions suitable for oceangoing ships, Appl Ocean Res, 79, 49, 10.1016/j.apor.2018.07.005 Rokseth, 2017, A systems approach to risk analysis of maritime operations, 231, 53 Rokseth, 2019, Safety verification for autonomous ships, 273, 02002 Montewka, 2018, Challenges, solution proposals and research directions in safety and risk assessment of autonomous shipping Thieme, 2018, Assessing ship risk model applicability to Marine Autonomous Surface Ships, Ocean Eng, 165, 65, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.040 Zhou, 2018, Collision risk identification of autonomous ships based on the synergy ship domain Wrobel, 2018, System-theoretic approach to safety of remotely-controlled merchant vessel, Ocean Eng, 152, 334, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.020 Wrobel, 2018, Towards the development of a system-theoretic model for safety assessment of autonomous merchant vessels, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 178, 209, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.019 Darwiche, 2009 Blanke, 2015 Khan, 2016, Dynamic risk management: a contemporary approach to process safety management, Current Opin Chem Eng, 14, 9, 10.1016/j.coche.2016.07.006 Zio, 2018, The future of risk assessment, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 177, 176, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.020 Adedigba S.A., Oloruntobi O., Khan F., Butt S., 2018. Data-driven dynamic risk analysis of offshore drilling operationsJ Pet Sci Eng165, 444-452. Barua, 2016, BN based dynamic operational risk assessment, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 41, 399, 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.024 Khakzad, 2013, Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayeisan network, Process Saf Environ Prot, 91, 46, 10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005 Paltrieri, 2014, Addressing dynamic risk in the petroleum industry by means of innovative analysis solutions, Chem Eng Trans, 36, 451 Li X., Chena G., Khan F., Xua C., 2019. Dynamic risk assessment of subsea pipelines leak using precursor dataOcean Eng178, 156-169. Zeng, 2018, Dynamic risk assessment based on statistical failure data and condition-monitoring degradation data, IEEE Trans Reliab, 67, 609, 10.1109/TR.2017.2778804 Rasmussen, 1997, Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem, Saf Sci, 27, 183, 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0 Leveson, 2011 Leveson N., Thomas J.P.2018. STPA Handbook. March 2018. https://psas.scripts.mit.edu/home/get_file.php?name=STPA_handbook.pdf(Accessed: 01-08-2019). Øien, 2001, Risk indicators as a tool for risk control, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 74, 129, 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00067-9 IMO: International Maritime Organization. 1972. Convention on the international regulations for preventing collisions at sea (COLREGs). Bye, 2018, Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: An exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 176, 174, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.033 Chen, 2019, Probabilistic risk analysis for ship-ship collision: State-of-the-art, Saf Sci, 117, 108, 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.014 Hassel, 2014, Analysis of the main challenges with the current risk model for collisions between ships and offshore installations on the norwegian continental shelf Kristiansen, 2013 Fenton, 2013 Wróbel, 2018, Towards A Method Evaluating Control Actions In STPA-Based Model of Ship-Ship Collision Avoidance Process Gil, 2019, Toward a method evaluating control actions in STPA – based model of ship-ship collision avoidance process, J Offshore Mech Arct Eng, 141, 10.1115/1.4042387 Mazaheri, 2016, Towards an evidence-based probabilistic risk model for ship-grounding accidents, Saf Sci, 86, 195, 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.002 Qin, 2003, A survey of industrial model predictive control technology, Control Eng Pract, 11, 733, 10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00186-7 Johansen, 2017, Toward dependable embedded model predictive control, IEEE Syst J, 11, 1208, 10.1109/JSYST.2014.2368129 Johansen, 2016, Ship collision avoidance and COLREGS compliance using simulation-based control behavior selection with predictive hazard assessment, IEEE Trans. Intell Transp Syst, 17, 3407, 10.1109/TITS.2016.2551780 DNVGL 2016. Rules for classification of ships – Dynamic positioning systems with enhanced reliablity. http://rules.dnvgl.com/docs/pdf/dnv/rulesship/2016-07/ts626.pdf. Sørensen, 2011, A survey of dynamic positioning control systems, IFAC J Ann Rev Control, 35, 123, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2011.03.008 IMT2018: Online risk management and risk control for autonomous ships. KPN ORCAS: Research project with industry participation, Department of Marine Technology, NTNU:https://www.ntnu.edu/imt/orcas(Accessed: 2019-02-08). 2008 Johansen I.L., 2010. Foundations of risk assessment. ROSS Report, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. Fischhoff, 1983 1992, The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations 2010 2001 IMO: International Maritime Organization, 2018. Revised guidelines for formal safety assessment, MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12/Rev.2, London, UK. Vinnem, 2014 Marszal, 2001, Tolerable risk guidelines, ISA Trans, 40, 391, 10.1016/S0019-0578(01)00011-8 2010 Baniela, 2011, Maritime safety standards and the seriousness of shipping accidents, J Nav, 64, 495, 10.1017/S0373463311000099 Reason, 1990 Rokseth, 2018, Deriving verification objectives and scenarios for maritime systems using the systems-theoretic process analysis, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 169, 18, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.015