Monitoring sãto paulo state rivers in brazil for mutagenic activity using the ames test

Wiley - Tập 8 Số 4 - Trang 371-381 - 1993
Gisela de Aragão Umbuzeiro1, Maria Inês Zanoli Sato1, Maria Luisa Cristina1, Letícia Coelho1, Carlos Alberto Coimbrão1, P. S. Sanchez1, Maria Therezinha Martins2, Renato Bonatelli3
1Microbiology Division, Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental—CETESB, Av. Prof. Frederico Hermann, Jr., 345, 05489–900–São Paulo, SP‐Brasil
2Department of Microbiology, ICB, Universidade de São Paulo—USP, São Paulo—Brasil
3Department of Genetics and Evolution, Universidade Estadual de Campinas—UNICAMP, Campinas, SP,—Brasil

Tóm tắt

AbstractOrganic extracts of raw water from 11 water courses of São Paulo State, Brazil, were collected during one year bimonthly and tested for mutagenicity using the Ames test, with strains TA98 and TA100 of Salmonella typhimurium with and without metabolic activation. The samples were extracted with XAD2 resin and eluted with methanol and methylene chloride. From the 75 samples analyzed, 14 showed positive responses and 8 were considered marginal, making up 29% of mutagenic samples. The percentage of mutagenic samples in October (spring) was 9%, increasing to 64% in February (summer), and decreased to 9% again in August (winter). Paraiba do Sul river showed the higher percentage of mutagenic samples (67%) and Capivari river the highest mutagenic sample (1787 and 3265 revertants per liter for TA98 without and with S9, respectively).The amplitude of the mutagenic response was 39–3265 revertants per liter for TA98 and 83–467 for TA100. The mutagenic samples showed direct and indirect mutagens, and TA98 detected the majority of responses, indicating prevalence of frameshift mutagens in these samples. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Cetesb, São Paulo, Brazil, 1988, Relatorio de qualidade das aguas interiores do Estado de São Paulo–1987, 134

Cetesb, São Paulo, Brazil, 1989, Relatorio de qualidade das aguas interiores do Estado de São Paulo–1988, 166

Coelho M. C. L. S., 1992, Mutagenicity evaluation of industrial effluents by Ames assay, Environ. Mol. Mutagen, 19, 11

Douglas G. R., 1980, Water Chlorination–Environmental Impact and Health Effects, 865

Dutka B. J. andK. D.Switzer‐House1978.Report on the distribution of mutagens and acute toxicants in Lake Ontario waters as assessed by microbiological procedures. C.C.I.W. Burlington Ontario 16pp.

Flanagan E., Effect of water treatment on mutagenic potential, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 27, 765

10.1002/j.1551-8833.1978.tb04215.x

Grabow W. O. K., 1980, Detection of mutagens in wastewater, a polluted river and drinking water by means of the Ames Salmonella/microsome assay, South Afr. J. Sci., 76, 108

10.1007/BF01622074

10.1016/0165-1110(92)90001-P

10.1016/0165-1218(83)90210-0

10.1016/0165-1161(83)90010-9

Martins M. T., 1982, Anais do VI Simposio Anual da ACIESP, 114

10.1016/0048-9697(83)90039-6

10.1007/978-1-4615-7849-9_20

10.1002/em.2860010405

Nestmann E. R., 1983, Water Chlorination–Environmental Impact and Health Effects, 1151

Pellizzari E. D., 1984, Master Analytical Scheme for Organic Compounds in Water, 154

10.1021/es60129a011

10.1002/tox.2540030107

10.1007/BF02026949

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1989, Guidelines establishing test procedures for the analysis of pollutants under the Clean Water Act, Fed. Reg., 54, 50216

10.1016/0048-9697(80)90004-2

Vargas V. M. F., 1988, Analysis of mutagenicity of waters under influence of petrochemical industrial complexes by the Ames test ( Samonella/Microsome), Braz. J. Genet., 11, 505

10.1016/0165-1218(86)90014-5