Navigating identity duality in multinational subsidiaries: A paradox lens on identity claims at Hindustan Unilever 1959–2015
Tóm tắt
Multinational subsidiaries do not merely seek legitimacy within their dual institutional contexts; they also strive to articulate an organizational identity by drawing on institutional resources embedded in these dual contexts. We draw attention to the subsidiary’s identity duality and conceptualize it as a paradox, i.e., as the juxtaposition of the contradictory, interdependent, and persistent characteristics of the ‘global’ and the ‘local’ in the subsidiary’s identity. Using 57 years of archival data from Hindustan Unilever, the Indian subsidiary of Anglo-Dutch multinational Unilever, we observe changing patterns in the articulation of identity claims by subsidiary leaders and develop a process model of how subsidiaries navigate identity duality over time. We find that subsidiary leaders may use two modes of organizational identity work for this purpose – logic ordering (the articulation of identity claims that respond to contradictory institutional demands by privileging one and subordinating the other) and logic bridging (the articulation of identity claims that respond to contradictory institutional demands by effecting a Janusian integration of the said demands). Over time, and employing these modes of identity work, leaders at Hindustan Unilever sustained a dynamic balance between the dual cores of the subsidiary’s espoused identity.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahmadjian, C. L. 2016. Comparative institutional analysis and institutional complexity. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1): 12–27.
Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. 1985. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1): 263–297.
Ambos, T. C., Andersson, U., & Birkinshaw, J. 2010. What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1099–1118.
Ambos, B., Asakawa, K., & Ambos, T. C. 2011. A dynamic perspective on subsidiary autonomy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4): 301–316.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. 2009. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696–717.
Anteby, M., & Molnar, V. 2012. Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3): 515–540.
Ashforth, B. E., & Johnson, S. A. 2001. Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 32–48). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Ashforth, B. E., & Reingen, P. H. 2014. Functions of dysfunction managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3): 474–516.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 2002. The transnational and beyond: Reflections and perspectives at the Millennium. In J. L. C. Cheng & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Managing transnational firms: Resources, market entry and alliances (advances in comparative international management) (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
Bello, D. C., & Kostova, T. 2012. From the Editors: Conducting high impact international business research: The role of theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(6): 537–543.
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. 2014. Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3): 364–381.
Birkinshaw, J. 1995. Is the country manager an endangered species? International Executive, 37(3): 279–301.
Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3): 207–229.
Bloomberg Businessweek. 2007. Unilever looks to recover lost Indian glory. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2007-09-26/unilever-looks-to-recover-lost-indian-glorybusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice. Accessed 26 November 2016.
Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3): 577–601.
Bouquet, C., Morrison, A., & Birkinshaw, J. 2009. International attention and multinational enterprise performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 108–131.
Brewer, M. B. 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5): 475–482.
Buckley, P. J. 2016. Historical approaches to the analysis of internationalisation. Management International Review, 56(6): 879–900.
Buckley, P. J., & Lessard, D. R. 2005. Regaining the edge for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 595.
Burgelman, R. A. 2011. Bridging history and reductionism: A key role for longitudinal qualitative research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 591–601.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. 1988. Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Cheney, G., & Christensen, L. T. 2004. Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 510–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chreim, S. 2005. The continuity–change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3): 567–593.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Andersson, U., Brannen, M. Y., Nielsen, B. B., & Reuber, A. R. 2016. From the editors: Can I trust your findings? Ruling out alternative explanations in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(8): 881–897.
Deephouse, D. L. 1999. To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question(and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2): 147–166.
Doz, Y. I., Bartlett, C. A., & Prahalad, C. K. 1981. Global competitive pressures and host country demands. California Management Review, 23(3): 63–74.
Durand, R., & Jacqueminet, A. 2015. Peer conformity, attention, and heterogeneous implementation of practices in MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(8): 917–937.
Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 517–554.
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. 2010. Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 265–293.
Edman, J. 2016. Cultivating foreignness: How organizations maintain and leverage minority identities. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1): 55–88.
Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. 1996. Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3): 442–476.
Farjoun, M. 2010. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 202–225.
Fieldhouse, D. K. 1978. Unilever overseas: The anatomy of a multinational 1895–1965. London: Croom Helm.
Fiol, C. M. 1991. Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 191–211.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ghemawat, P. 2011. The cosmopolitan corporation. Harvard Business Review, 89(5): 92–99.
Ghislanzoni, G., Penttinen, R., & Turnbull, D. 2008. The multilocal challenge: Managing cross-border functions. McKinsey Quarterly, March: 70–81.
Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. 1989. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4): 323–337.
Gioia, D. A. 1998. From individual to organizational identity. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 17–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013a. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 15–31.
Gioia, D. A., & Patvardhan, S. 2012. Identity as process and flow. In M. Schultz, S. Maguire, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Constructing identity in and around organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. 2013b. Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1): 123–193.
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. 2000. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 63–81.
Glynn, M. A. 2008. Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413–430). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Glynn, M. A., & Abzug, R. 2002. Institutionalizing identity: symbolic isomorphism and organizational names. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 267–280.
Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. 2005. From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5): 1031–1055.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 317–371.
Gregersen, H. B., & Black, J. S. 1992. Antecedents to commitment to a parent company and a foreign operation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1): 65–90.
Hillman, A. J., & Wan, W. P. 2005. The determinants of MNE subsidiaries’ political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 322–341.
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. 2009. Doing well by doing good. Hamara: The Hindustan Unilever Employee Magazine. https://www.hul.co.in/Images/hul_75years_special_issue__tcm1255-447470_en.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2017.
Jay, J. 2013. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 137–159.
Jones, G. 2005. Renewing Unilever: Transformation and tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, G., & Khanna, T. 2006. Bringing history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4): 453–468.
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215–233.
Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 994–1006.
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64–81.
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kreiner, G., Hollensbe, E., Sheep, M., Smith, B., & Kataria, N. 2014. Elasticity and the dialectic tensions of organizational identity: How can we hold together while we’re pulling apart? Academy of Management Journal, 58(4): 981–1011.
Kreiner, G. E., & Murphy, C. 2016. Organizational identity work. In M. G. Pratt, M. Schultz, B. E. Ashforth, & D. Ravasi (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational identity (pp. 276–296). New York: Oxford University Press.
Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 691–710.
Lavine, M. 2011. Positive deviance: A metaphor and method for learning from the uncommon. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreizer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 1014–1026). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, M. W. 2000. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 760–776.
Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. 2014. Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2): 127–149.
Lok, J. 2010. Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1305–1335.
Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. 2008. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2): 221–240.
Maitland, E., & Sammartino, A. 2015. Managerial cognition and internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7): 733–760.
Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. 2011. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 235–252.
Mohr, L. B. 1982. Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Morgan, G., & Kristensen, P. H. 2006. The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations, 59(11): 1467–1490.
Muzio, D., & Faulconbridge, J. R. 2013. The global professional service firm: “one firm” models versus Italian distant institutionalised practices. Organization Studies, 34, 897–925.
Nag, R., Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 821–847.
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. 2010. How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3): 439–471.
Nayak, A. 2008. Multinationals in India: FDI and complementation strategy in a developing country. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ocasio, W., & Radoynovska, N. 2016. Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: Organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance. Strategic Organization, 14(4): 287–309.
Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 697–713.
Panagariya, A. 2008. India: The emerging giant. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pedersen, J. S., & Dobbin, F. 2006. In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7): 897–907.
Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. 1989. Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 562–578.
Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L. 1987. The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.
Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 18–42.
Quinn, R. E. 1988. Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. 2006. Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3): 433–458.
Reade, C. 2001. Dual identification in multinational corporations: Local managers and their psychological attachment to the subsidiary versus the global organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(3): 405–424.
Reay, T., & Jones, C. 2016. Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic Organization, 14(4): 441–454.
Reger, R. K., Gustafson, L. T., Demarie, S. M., & Mullane, J. V. 1994. Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy of Management Review, 19(3): 565–584.
Regner, P., & Edman, J. 2014. MNE institutional advantage: How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(3): 275–302.
Regner, P., & Zander, U. 2011. Knowledge and strategy creation in multinational companies: Social-identity frames and temporary tension in knowledge combination. Management International Review, 51(6): 821–850.
Roth, K., & Kostova, T. 2003. The use of the multinational corporation as a research context. Journal of Management, 29(6): 883–902.
Salomon, R., & Wu, Z. 2012. Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4): 343–367.
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. 2016. Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1): 5–64.
Schultz, M., & Hernes, T. 2013. A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization Science, 24(1): 1–21.
Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. D. 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 222–247.
Siggelkow, N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 20–24.
Smale, A., Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., John, S., Mäkelä, K., & Sumelius, J. 2015. Dual values-based organizational identification in MNC subsidiaries: A multilevel study. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7): 761–783.
Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. 2015. Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3): 932–970.
Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. 2012. From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 877–904.
Smith, W. K. 2014. Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6): 1592–1623.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 381–403.
Smith, W. K., & Tracey, P. 2016. Institutional complexity and paradox theory: Complementarities of competing demands. Strategic Organization, 14(4): 455–466.
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5): 522–536.
Stahl, G. K., & Tung, R. L. 2015. Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4): 391–414.
Stimpert, J. L. 1998. A strategy conversation on the topic of organization identity. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 99–170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Trank, C. Q. 2016. Re-membering: Rhetorical history as identity work. In M. G. Pratt, M. Schultz, B. E. Ashforth, & D. Ravasi (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational identity (pp. 297–316). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. 2003. Organizing for resilience. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94–110). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Tandon, P. 2001. Punjabi saga 1857–2000: Monumental story of five generations of a remarkable Punjabi family. New Delhi: Rupa.
Tempel, A., Edwards, T., Ferner, A., Muller-Camen, M., & Wächter, H. 2006. Subsidiary responses to institutional duality: Collective representation practices of US multinationals in Britain and Germany. Human Relations, 59(11): 1543–1570.
The Economic Times. 1998. Why is Hindustan Lever so expensive? 12 July: 11.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3): 801–843.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tripsas, M. 2009. Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of ‘the digital photography company’. Organization Science, 20(2): 441–460.
Venkatesan, R. 2013. Conquering the chaos: Win in India, win everywhere. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Vergne, J. P., & Wry, T. 2014. Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1): 56–94.
Vernon, R. 1977. Storm over the multinationals: The real issues. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Voisey, C. J. 2010. When a Japanese subsidiary is not a Japanese subsidiary: Internationalization as changing organizational identity and capabilities. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10(2): 211–239.
Vora, D., & Kostova, T. 2007. A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(3): 327–350.
Vora, D., Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2007. Roles of subsidiary managers in multinational corporations: The effect of dual organizational identification. Management International Review, 47(4): 595–620.
Whetten, D. A. 2006. Albert and Whetten revisited. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3): 219–234.
Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. 2002. A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, 41(4): 393–414.
Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, S. 2017. Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1): 93–113.
Zuckerman, E. W., Kim, T. Y., Ukanwa, K., & von Rittmann, J. 2003. Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5): 1018–1073.