Lactobacilli Reduce Chemokine IL-8 Production in Response to TNF-αandSalmonellaChallenge of Caco-2 Cells

BioMed Research International - Tập 2013 - Trang 1-9 - 2013
Dayong Ren1,2, Chang Li2, Yan-qing Qin1,2, Ronglan Yin3, Shouwen Du2, Fei Ye2, Hongfeng Liu2, Maopeng Wang2, Yang Sun2, Xiao Li2, Mingyao Tian2, Ningyi Jin2
1College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, China
2Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Institute of Military Veterinary, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Changchun, 130122, China
3Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine of Jilin Province, Changchun 130062, China

Tóm tắt

The probiotic properties of two selected lactobacilli strains were assessed.L. salivariusandL. plantarumdisplayed higher hydrophobicity (48% and 54%, resp.) and coaggregation ability with four pathogens (from 7.9% to 57.5%).L. salivariusandL. plantarumhad good inhibitory effects onS. aureus(38.2% and 49.5%, resp.) attachment to Caco-2 cells. Live lactobacilli strains and their conditioned media effectively inhibited IL-8 production (<14.6 pg/mL) in TNF-α-induced Caco-2 cells. Antibiotic-treated and the sonicated lactobacilli also maintained inhibitory effects (IL-8 production from 5.0 to 36.3 pg/mL); however, the heat-treated lactobacilli lost their inhibitory effects (IL-8 production from 130.2 to 161.0 pg/mL). These results suggest that both the structural components and the soluble cellular content of lactobacilli have anti-inflammatory effects. We also found that pretreatment of Caco-2 cells with lactobacilli inhibitedS. typhimurium-induced IL-8 production (<27.3 pg/mL). However, lactobacilli did not inhibit IL-8 production in Caco-2 cells pretreated withS. typhimurium. These results suggest that the tested lactobacilli strains are appropriate for preventing inflammatory diseases caused by enteric pathogens but not for therapy. In short,L. salivariusandL. plantarumare potential candidates for the development of microbial ecological agents and functional foods.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.04.004

10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02684.x

10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.02.025

10.1128/AEM.00185-11

10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00791.x

2009, PloS one, 4, e8099, 10.1371/journal.pone.0008099

1995, Journal of Immunology, 155, 4147, 10.4049/jimmunol.155.9.4147

2000, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 105, 79, 10.1172/JCI8066

1997, American Journal of Gastroenterology, 92, 1342

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.05.013

2002, Experimental Biology and Medicine, 227, 665, 10.1177/153537020222700817

2013, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 288, 30742, 10.1074/jbc.M113.492397

10.1016/0167-7012(93)90072-P

1989, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 84, 1588, 10.1172/JCI114336

10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00294.x

10.1080/00365520801965373

1989, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55, 279, 10.1128/AEM.55.2.279-283.1989

1997, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 24, 361, 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00140.x

1978, Journal of Chronic Diseases, 31, 67, 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90091-7

1995, Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 21, 85, 10.3109/10408419509113535

10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00454.x

10.1128/AEM.66.6.2548-2554.2000

1985, FEMS Microbiology Letters, 30, 131, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1985.tb00999.x

10.1016/j.anaerobe.2006.03.001

1986, Journal of Microbiological Methods, 6, 13, 10.1016/0167-7012(86)90027-8

10.1016/j.resmic.2010.06.005

2008, Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 18, 1278

10.1016/j.micres.2011.02.006

10.1007/s12223-008-0040-z

2012, Anaerobe, 18, 508, 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.08.001

10.1128/IAI.72.9.5308-5314.2004

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.04.012

10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.019

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04343.x

10.1007/s12223-010-0068-8

10.1017/S002202990999046X

10.1095/biolreprod.110.085167

10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.022

10.1021/jf103011z