Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes

2002 Day, 1995, Monitoring interval cancers in breast screening programmes: the East Anglian experience, J Med Screen, 2, 180, 10.1177/096914139500200402 Day, 2003, The NHS breast cancer screening programme, Br J Cancer, 89, 1, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601129 Warren, 2000, Interval cancers as an indicator of performance in breast screening, Breast Cancer, 7, 9, 10.1007/BF02967182 Taylor, 2002, Interval breast cancers in New South Wales, Australia, and comparisons with trials and other mammographic screening programmes, J Med Screen, 9, 20, 10.1136/jms.9.1.20 Everington, 1999, The Scottish breast screening programme's experience of monitoring interval cancers, J Med Screen, 6, 21, 10.1136/jms.6.1.21 Buist, 2004, Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40–49 years, J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 1432, 10.1093/jnci/djh269 Warren, 2003, Radiology review of the UKCCCR Breast Screening Frequency Trial: potential improvements in sensitivity and lead time of radiological signs, Clin Radiol, 58, 128, 10.1053/crad.2002.1132 Koivunen, 1994, Interval breast cancers are not biologically distinct: just more difficult to diagnose, Am J Surg, 168, 538, 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80118-7 Frisell, 1992, Interval cancer and survival in a randomized breast cancer screening trial in Stockholm, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 24, 11, 10.1007/BF01832353 Holmberg, 1986, Survival in breast cancer diagnosed between mammographic screening examinations, Lancet, 2, 27, 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92569-9 Brekelmans, 1995, Survival in interval breast cancer in the DOM screening programme, Eur J Cancer, 31A, 1830, 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00324-C 2005 1997 Gower-Thomas, 2002, Reviewing interval cancers: time well spent?, Clin Radiol, 57, 384, 10.1053/crad.2001.0882 Britton, 2001, Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme, Clin Radiol, 56, 44, 10.1053/crad.2000.0643 Amos, 2000, Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme, J Med Screen, 7, 184, 10.1136/jms.7.4.184 De Rijke, 2000, A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the Netherlands, J Med Screen, 7, 19, 10.1136/jms.7.1.19 Moberg, 1999, Two models for radiological reviewing of interval cancers, J Med Screen, 6, 35, 10.1136/jms.6.1.35 Duncan, 1995, Classifying interval cancers, Clin Radiol, 50, 774, 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83218-0 Harvey, 1993, Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 161, 1167, 10.2214/ajr.161.6.8249720 Moberg, 2001, Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers, Eur J Radiol, 39, 104, 10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00291-1 Asbury, 1996, NHS breast screening programme: is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable?, BMJ, 313, 1369, 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1369 Vitak, 1998, Invasive interval cancers in the Ostergotland Mammographic Screening Programme: radiological analysis, Eur Radiol, 8, 639, 10.1007/s003300050452 Ikeda, 1992, Interval carcinomas in the Malmo Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 159, 287, 10.2214/ajr.159.2.1632342 Ciatto, 1995, The detectability of breast cancer by screening mammography, Br J Cancer, 71, 337, 10.1038/bjc.1995.67 Warren, 2004, An audit of assessment procedures in women who develop breast cancer after a negative result, J Med Screen, 11, 180, 10.1258/0969141042467395 Blanks, 1998, A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme, J Med Screen, 5, 195, 10.1136/jms.5.4.195 Mucci, 1999, Double read screening mammograms: the use of a third reader to arbitrate on disagreements, Breast, 8, 37, 10.1016/S0960-9776(99)90337-5 Deans, 1998, Scottish experience of double reading in the National Breast Screening Programme, Breast, 7, 75, 10.1016/S0960-9776(98)90060-1 Ciatto, 1995, Independent double reading of screening mammograms, J Med Screen, 2, 99, 10.1177/096914139500200209 Anderson, 1994, The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening, Clin Radiol, 49, 248, 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81850-1 Thurfjell, 1994, Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program, Radiology, 191, 241, 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134580 Given-Wilson, 1999, Incident screening cancers detected with a second mammographic view: pathological and radiological features, Clin Radiol, 54, 724, 10.1016/S0009-9260(99)91174-1 Blanks, 1998, Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: two versus one view mammography, J Med Screen, 5, 141, 10.1136/jms.5.3.141 Young, 1997, Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: results from the NHS Breast Screening Programme, Br J Radiol, 70, 482, 10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227229 Blanks, 1997, Use of two view mammography compared with one view in the detection of small invasive cancers: further results from the National Health Service breast screening programme, J Med Screen, 4, 98, 10.1177/096914139700400206 Wald, 1995, UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening, BMJ, 311, 1189, 10.1136/bmj.311.7014.1189 Ciatto, 1999, Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists, J Med Screen, 6, 149, 10.1136/jms.6.3.149 Kan, 2000, Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program, Radiology, 215, 563, 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma42563 Schmidt, 1998, Medical audit after 26,711 breast imaging studies improved rate of detection of small breast carcinomas (classified as Tis or T1a,b), Cancer, 83, 2516, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981215)83:12<2516::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-# Irwig, 2004, New technologies in screening for breast cancer: a systematic review of their accuracy, Br J Cancer, 90, 2118, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601836 Ciatto, 2003, Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography, Eur J Radiol, 45, 135, 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00011-6 Taylor, 2005, Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices, Br J Radiol, 78, S26, 10.1259/bjr/84545410 Taylor, 2004, An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms, Br J Radiol, 77, 21, 10.1259/bjr/34203805 Frisell, 1987, Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 9, 219, 10.1007/BF01806383 Sylvester, 1997, Rate and classification of interval cancers in the breast screening programme, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 79, 276 Field, 1995, What should be done about interval breast cancers?, BMJ, 310, 203, 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.203 Irwig L, Houssami N, Glasziou P, Armstrong B. Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer may require randomised controlled trials to assess overdetection. BMJ (in press). Liberman, 2004, Breast cancer screening with MRI: what are the data for patients at high risk?, N Engl J Med, 351, 497, 10.1056/NEJMe048117 Leach, 2005, Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS), Lancet, 365, 1769, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66481-1 Pisano, 2005, Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening, N Engl J Med, 353, 1773, 10.1056/NEJMoa052911 Mandelson, 2000, Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers, J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 1081, 10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081 Ciatto, 2004, Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening, Br J Cancer, 90, 393, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601548