Evaluation of “All‐on‐Four” Concept and Alternative Designs with 3D Finite Element Analysis Method
Tóm tắt
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the forces on the implant and supporting alveolar ridge in “all on four” concept and alternative designs using finite element analysis.
Different treatment alternatives with various implant designs were performed in an edentulous mandible. In Design 1, implants were placed according to “All‐on‐Four” concept; Design 2, two long (13 mm long, 4 mm diameter) and two short (7 mm long, 4 mm diameter) implants; Design 3, four long and two short implants; and Design 4, two long and four short implants were placed vertically. A force of 100
The stress concentration within the cortical bone was significantly higher than the trabecular bone around the neck of the implants. The maximum stress values were located around the cortical bone of the distal implant for all designs. The reduction in the number of implants did not diminish the success of the design.
In the presence of vertically resorbed posterior mandibula, although the “all on four” concept is a feasible approach clinically, short implants had decreased the amount of force transmitted to the supporting bone.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Carlsson GE, 2005, Changes in the Prosthodontic Literature 1966 to 2042, J Can Dent Assoc, 71, 328
Misch CM, 2011, Bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible for dental implants using rhBMP‐2 and titanium mesh: clinical technique and early results, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 31, 581
Neldam CA, 2010, State of the art of short dental implants: a systematic review of the literature, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 10, 1708
Raviv E, 2010, Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height, Quintessence Int, 41, 575
Deporter D, 2000, Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous‐surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, 476
Anusavice KJ, 2003, Philips' science of dental materials, 166
Bidez MW, 1992, Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principals, J Oral Implantol, 18, 264
Akça K, 2001, Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants, Int J Oral & Maxillofac Implants, 16, 722
Zyl PP, 1995, Three dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prosthesis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, 51
Fazi G, 2011, Three‐dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, 752
Lum LB, 1992, Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: an analysis using statics. Part one: horizontal loading, J Oral Implantol, 18, 343
Akça K, 2002, A comparison of three‐dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants, Int J Prosthodont, 15, 115
Pierrisnard L, 2003, Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution, Clin Oral Implants Res, 5, 254
Clelland NL, 1993, A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, 541
Stegaroiu R, 1998, Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three‐dimensional finite element analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, 82
Kim KS, 2011, Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full‐arch fixed prostheses, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, 976
Naini RB, 2011, Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three‐dimensional finite element analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, 776
Silva GC, 2010, Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three‐dimensional finite element analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, 239
Begg T, 2009, Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all‐on‐four concept configuration, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, 663