The oblique perspective: philosophical diagnostics of contemporary life sciences research
Tóm tắt
This paper indicates how continental philosophy may contribute to a diagnostics of contemporary life sciences research, as part of a “diagnostics of the present” (envisioned by continental thinkers, from Hegel up to Foucault). First, I describe (as a “practicing” philosopher) various options for an oblique (or symptomatic) reading of emerging scientific discourse, bent on uncovering the basic “philosophemes” of science (i.e. the guiding ideas, the basic conceptions of nature, life and technology at work in contemporary life sciences research practices). Subsequently, I outline a number of radical transformations occurring both at the object-pole and at the subject-pole of the current knowledge relationship, namely the technification of the object and the anonymisation or collectivisation of the subject, under the sway of automation, ICT and big machines. Finally, I further elaborate the specificity of the oblique perspective with the help of Lacan’s theorem of the four discourses. Philosophical reflections on contemporary life sciences concur neither with a Master’s discourse (which aims to strengthen the legitimacy and credibility of canonical sources), nor with university discourse (which aims to establish professional expertise), nor with what Lacan refers to as hysterical discourse (which aims to challenge representatives of the power establishment), but rather with the discourse of the analyst, listening with evenly-poised attention to the scientific files in order to bring to the fore the cupido sciendi (i.e. the will to know, but also to optimise and to control) which both inspires and disrupts contemporary life sciences discourse.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Althusser L, Balibar É. Lire le capital I. Paris: Maspero; 1965/1970.
Bachelard G. La terre et les rêveries de la volonté. Paris: Corti; 1948.
Bachelard G. La Psychanalyse du Feu. Paris: Gallimard; 1938/1949.
Bachelard G. Le rationalisme appliqué. Paris: Presses universitaires de France; 1949/1962.
Benyus J. Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: HarperCollins; 1997.
Breil R. Die Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaften: Zu Begriff und Geschichte der Wissenschaftstheorie. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann; 2011.
Church G, Regis E. Regenesis: how synthetic biology will reinvent nature and ourselves. New York: Basic Books; 2013.
Coeckelbergh M. Language and technology: maps, bridges, and pathways. AI Soc. 2015. doi: 10.1007/s00146-015-0604-9.
Critchley S. Continental philosophy: a very short introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Diderot D. Pensées sur l’interprétation de la nature. Paris: Vrin; 1754/1983.
Elowitz M, Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature. 2000;403:335–38.
Foucault M. L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard; 1969.
Foucault M. Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur. In: Foucault M, editors. Dits et Écrits. Paris: Gallimard; 1969/1994. p.789–809.
Freud S. Ratschläge für den Arzt bei der psychoanalytischen Behandlung. In: Freud S, editors. Gesammelte Werke VIII (Werke aus den Jahren 1909 – 1913). London: Imago; 1912/1943. p. 375–388.
Gadamer HG. Wahrheit und Methode. Gesammelte Werke I. Hermeneutik I. Tübingen: Mohr; 1960/1990.
Gilbert JA, Neufeld JD. Life in a world without microbes. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(12):1–3.
Glendinning S. The idea of continental philosophy: a philosophical chronicle. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2006.
Goethe JW von. Faust: eine Tragödie. Goethes Werke VIII. Berlin/Leipzig/Wien/Stuttgart: Deutsches Verlagshaus Bong & Co; 1808/1910.
Habermas J. Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1968/1973.
Harman G. The quadruple object. Winchester/Washington: Zero; 2011.
Hartmann N. Ontologie I: Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie. Berlin/Leipzig: De Gruyter; 1935.
Hegel GWF. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse II: Die Naturphilosophie mit den mündlichen Zusätzen. Werke IX. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1830/1970.
Hegel GWF. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Werke III. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1807/1973.
Hegel GWF. Rede beim Antritt des philosophischen Lehramtes an der Universität Berlin. Werke X, 399–420. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1818/1970.
Hegel GWF. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie I. Werke XVIII. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1832/1971.
Hegel GWF. Wissenschaft der Logik I. Werke V. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1812/1986.
Heidegger M. Logos. In: Heidegger M, editors. Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen: Neske; 1951/1954. p. 207–230.
Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer; 1927/1986.
Heidegger M. Wissenschaft und Besinnung. In: Heidegger M. Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen: Neske; 1953/1954. p. 45–70.
Houellebecq M. Les particules élémentaires. Paris: Flammarion; 1998.
Jackson M. Life story (movie). BBC. 1987.
Lacan J. Le séminaire XVII : L’envers de la psychanalyse. Paris: Éditions du Seuil; 1969-1970/1991.
Luckey T. Germfree life and gnotobiology. New York & London: Academic; 1963.
Meyerhoff A, Lietman P. All the world’s a laboratory. New York times. 2009.
Nietzsche F. Morgenröte: Gedanken über die moralischen Vorurteile. Sämtliche Werke III (Hrsg. G. Colli, M. Montinari). München/Berlin/New York: DTV/De Gruyter; 1881/1980.
Schmidt R. The domain of logic according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. The Hague: Nijhoff; 1966.
Serres M. Hermes II: L’interférence. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit; 1972.
Sloterdijk P. Kritik der zynischen Vernunft. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main; 1983.
Smith BH. What was close reading? A century of method in literary studies. Minn Rev. 2016;87:57–75.
Sulston J, Ferry G. The common thread: a story of science, politics, ethics and the human genome. London: Corgi; 2003.
Verbeek PP. What Things Do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency and design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2000/2005.
Wilkins M. The Third Man of the Double Helix: An autobiography. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 2003/2005.
Zwart H. Challenges of macro-ethics: bioethics and the transformation of knowledge production. J Bioeth Inq. 2008;5(4):283–93.
Zwart H. Biotechnology and naturalness in the genomics era: plotting a timetable for the biotechnology debate. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2009;22:505–29.
Zwart H. The Nobel Prize as a reward mechanism in the genomics era: Anonymous researchers, visible managers and the ethics of excellence. J Bioeth Inq. 2010;7:299–312.
Zwart H. The Third Man: Comparative analysis of a science autobiography and a cinema classic as windows into post-War life sciences research. Hist Philos Life Sci. 2015;37(4):382–412. doi:10.1007/s40656-015-0080-z.
Zwart H. Psychoanalysis and bioethics: A Lacanian approach to bioethical discourse. Med Healthcare Philos. 2016; 19. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9698-1.
Zwart H. The obliteration of life: depersonalisation and disembodiment in the terabyte age. New Genet Soc. 2016; 35(1). doi: 10.1080/14636778.2016.1143770
Zwart H, Krabbenborg L, Zwier J. Is dandelion rubber more natural? naturalness, biotechnology and the transition towards a bio-based society. J Environ Agric Ethics. 2015;28:313–34. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9536-0.
Zwart H, Landeweerd L, Lemmens P. Continental philosophical perspectives on life sciences and emerging technologies (editorial). Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2016;12(8). doi:10.1186/s40504-016-0041-7