An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes
Tóm tắt
There is often need to measure aggregation levels of spatial patterns within a single map class in landscape ecological studies. The contagion index (CI), shape index (SI), and probability of adjacency of the same class (Qi), all have certain limits when measuring aggregation of spatial patterns. We have developed an aggregation index (AI) that is class specific and independent of landscape composition. AI assumes that a class with the highest level of aggregation (AI =1) is comprised of pixels sharing the most possible edges. A class whose pixels share no edges (completely disaggregated) has the lowest level of aggregation (AI =0). AI is similar to SI and Qi, but it calculates aggregation more precisely than the latter two. We have evaluated the performance of AI under varied levels of (1) aggregation, (2) number of patches, (3) spatial resolutions, and (4) real species distribution maps at various spatial scales. AI was able to produce reasonable results under all these circumstances. Since it is class specific, it is more precise than CI, which measures overall landscape aggregation. Thus, AI provides a quantitative basis to correlate the spatial pattern of a class with a specific process. Since AI is a ratio variable, map units do not affect the calculation. It can be compared between classes from the same or different landscapes, or even the same classes from the same landscape under different resolutions.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Clark, M. W. 1981. Quantitative shape analysis: a review. Mathematical Geology 13: 303–320.
Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Gardner, R. H. and O'Neill, R. V. 1991. Pattern, process, and predictability: the use of neutral models for landscape analysis. In Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Edited by M. G. Turner and R. H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
Graham, R. L., Hunsaker, C. T., O'Neill, R. V. and Jackson, B. 1991. Ecological risk assessment at the regional scale. Ecological Application 1: 196–206.
Gustafson, E. J. and Parker, G. R. 1992. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecology 7: 101–110.
Haines-Young, R. and Chopping, M. 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography 20:418–445.
Li, H. and Reynolds, J. F. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 155–162.
McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. J. 1994. Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, FRAGSTATS version 2.0. Forest Science Dept., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR, USA.
Meisel, J. E. and Turner, M. G. 1998. Scale detection in real and artificial landscapes using semivariance analysis. Landscape Ecology 113: 347–362.
Mladenoff, D. J. and Dezonia, B. 1997. APACK 2.0 user's guide. Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
O'Neill, R. V., Krummel, J. R., Gardner, R. H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D. L., Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S. W., Dale, V. H. and Graham, R. L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153–162.
Patton, D. R. 1975. A diversity index for quantifying habitat ‘edge’. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3: 171–173.
Riitters, K. H., O'Neill, R. V., Hunsaker, C. T., Wickham, J. D., Yankee, D. H. and Timmins, S. P. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23–39.
Riitters, K. H., O'Neill, R. H., Wickham, J. D. and Jones, K. B. 1996. A note on contagion indices for landscape analysis. Landscape Ecology 11: 197–202.
Schumaker, N. H. 1996. Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology 77: 1210–1225.
Turner, M. G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systems 20: 171–197.
Turner, M. G., Costanza, R., and Sklar, F. H. 1989. Methods to evaluate the performance of spatial simulation models. Ecological Modelling 48: 1–18.
Turner, M. G. 1990. Landscape changes in nine rural counties of Georgia. Photogrametry Engineering and Remote Sensing 56: 379–386.
Wickham, J. D. and Riitters, K. H. 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16: 3585–3594.
Wickham, J. D., Ritters, K. H., O'Neill, R. V., Jones, K. B., and Wade, T. G. 1996. Landscape ‘contagion’ in raster and vector environments. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10: 891–899.
Wiens, J. A. and Milne, B. T. 1989. Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective. Landscape Ecology 3: 87–96.