Factors influencing coverage decisions on medical devices: A retrospective analysis of 78 medical device appraisals for the Austrian hospital benefit catalogue 2008⿿2015

Health Policy - Tập 120 - Trang 903-912 - 2016
Agnes Kisser1, Heinz Tüchler1, Judit Erdös1, Claudia Wild1
1Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment, Austria

Tài liệu tham khảo

Sorenson, 2012, Reflections on the evolution of health technology assessment in Europe, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 7, 25, 10.1017/S1744133111000296 Velasco-Garrido, 2008, Health systems, health policy and health technology assessment Ciani, 2015, Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 31, 154, 10.1017/S0266462315000185 Hulstaert, 2012, Pre-market clinical evaluations of innovative high-risk medical devices in Europe, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28, 278, 10.1017/S0266462312000335 Boudard, 2013, Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment?, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 19, 697, 10.1111/jep.12024 Cerri, 2014, Decision making by NICE: examining the influences of evidence, process and context, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 9, 119, 10.1017/S1744133113000030 Charokopou, 2015, Which factors enhance positive drug reimbursement recommendation in Scotland? A retrospective analysis 2006⿿2013, Value in Health, 18, 284, 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.008 Dakin, 2006, Yes⿿, ⿿No⿿ or ⿿Yes, but⿿? Multinomial modelling of NICE decision-making, Health Policy, 77, 352, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.08.008 Devlin, 2004, Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis, Health Economics, 13, 437, 10.1002/hec.864 Linley, 2012, Reimbursement decisions of the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group: influence of policy and clinical and economic factors, Pharmacoeconomics, 30, 779, 10.2165/11591530-000000000-00000 Mason, 2010, Comparison of anticancer drug coverage decisions in the United States and United Kingdom: does the evidence support the rhetoric?, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 3234, 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2758 Cerri, 2014, Public funding of pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands: investigating the effect of evidence, process and context on CVZ decision-making, European Journal of Health Economics, 15, 681, 10.1007/s10198-013-0514-z George, 2001, Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996), Pharmacoeconomics, 19, 1103, 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00004 Harris, 2008, The role of value for money in public insurance coverage decisions for drugs in Australia: a retrospective analysis 1994⿿2004, Medical Decision Making, 28, 713, 10.1177/0272989X08315247 Loge, 2015, Factors influencing reimbursement of medical devices in France, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 6, 399, 10.1017/S0266462315000707 Federal Ministry of Health. The Austrian DRG system. Available from: http://www.bmg.gv.at/cms/home/attachments/9/4/3/CH1015/CMS1292515593745/austrian_drg_bmg_2010_end_eng_revised.pdf [accessed 30.09.15]. Mad, 2012, Pre-coverage assessments of new hospital interventions on Austria: methodology and 3 years of experience, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28, 171, 10.1017/S0266462312000025 Balshem, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 401, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 European Network for Health Technology assessment. EUnetHTA. Methodological guideline for REA of pharmaceuticals: Internal validity. Available from: http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/methodological-guideline-rea-pharmaceuticals-internal-validity [accessed 09.05.16]. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment. Evaluation of individual medical procedures ⿿ Reports. Available from: http://hta.lbg.ac.at/page/bewertung-medizinischer-einzelleistungen-mel-berichte. European Network for Health Technology assessment. EUnetHTA. Methodological guideline for REA of pharmaceuticals: Criteria for the choice of the most appropriate comparator(s). Available from: http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/methodological-guideline-rea-pharmaceuticals-criteria-choice-most-appropriate-comparators [accessed 30.09.15]. European Network for Health Technology assessment. EUnetHTA. Methodological guideline for REA of pharmaceuticals: clinical endpoints. Available from: http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/methodological-guideline-rea-pharmaceuticals-clinical-endpoints [accessed 30.09.15]. European Network for Health Technology assessment. EUnetHTA. Methodological guideline for REA of pharmaceuticals: Surrogate endpoints. Available from: http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/methodological-guideline-rea-pharmaceuticals-surrogate-endpoints [accessed 30.09.15]. European Commission. Medical devices guidance document ⿿ classification of medical devices, MEDDEV 2.4/1 Rev. 9, June 2010. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/medical-devices/guidance/index_en.htm [accessed 30.09.15]. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/ [accessed 30.09.15]. Expedited Access for Premarket Approval and De Novo Medical Devices Intended for Unmet Medical Needfor Life Threatening or Irreversibly Debilitating Diseases or Conditions ⿿ Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Available from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM393978.pdf [accessed 09.05.16]. Walker, 2012, Coverage with evidence development, only in research, risk sharing, or patient access scheme? A framework for coverage decisions, Value in Health, 15, 570, 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.013 Griffin, 2011, Dangerous omissions: the consequences of ignoring decision uncertainty, Health Economics, 20, 212, 10.1002/hec.1586 Brugger, 2014, Development of coverage with evidence development for medical technologies in Switzerland from 1996 to 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 30, 253, 10.1017/S0266462314000233 Tunis, 2006, Coverage options for promising technologies: Medicare's ⿿coverage with evidence development⿿, Health Affairs (Millwood), 25, 1218, 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1218 Menon, 2010, Principles of design of access with evidence development approaches: a consensus statement from the Banff Summit, Pharmacoeconomics, 28, 109, 10.2165/11530860-000000000-00000 Martelli, 2016, New French coverage with evidence development for innovative medical devices: improvements and unresolved issues, Value in Health, 17, 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.006 Vitry, 2014, Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in Australia, Health Policy, 117, 345, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.05.005 Godman, 2012, Improving the managed entry of new medicines: sharing experiences across Europe, Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 12, 439, 10.1586/erp.12.44 Baeyens, 2015