The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma gel in MRSA-related surgical wound infection treatment: an experimental study in an animal model

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery - Tập 44 - Trang 859-867 - 2017
R. A. Cetinkaya1, S. Yilmaz2, A. Ünlü3, P. Petrone4,5,6, C. Marini5, E. Karabulut7, M. Urkan8, E. Kaya9, K. Karabacak10, M. Uyanik11, I. Eker12, A. Kilic13, A. Gunal14
1Department of Infectious Disease, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Education Hospital, University of Health Science, Istanbul, Turkey
2Blood and Training Center, Gulhane Training and Education Hospital, University of Health Science, Ankara, Turkey
3Department of War Surgery, Gulhane Training and Education Hospital, University of Health Science, Ankara, Turkey
4Department of Surgery, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, USA
5New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA
6Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
7Turkish Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Institution, Ankara, Turkey
8Department of General Surgery, Gulhane Training and Education Hospital, University of Health Science, Ankara, Turkey
9Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gulhane Training and Education Hospital, University of Health Science, Ankara, Turkey
11Biochemistry Laboratory, Corlu State Hospital, Tekirdag, Turkey
12Department of Pediatrics, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey
13Yaman İs OSGB, Ankara, Turkey
14Department of Pathology, Kırıkkale Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Kırıkkale, Turkey

Tóm tắt

The wound healing properties of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) gel have been documented in many studies. PRP gel has also become a promising agent for treating surgical site infections. In this study, we investigated the antibacterial activity and wound healing effectiveness of PRP in an animal model of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus (MRSA N315)-contaminated superficial soft tissue wounds. Subcutaneous wounds in Wistar Albino male rats were created by making two cm midline incisions followed by inoculation of microorganisms. Study groups comprised of Sham (no treatment), PRP alone, MRSA alone, MRSA + PRP, MRSA + Vancomycin, and MRSA + Vancomycin + PRP groups. We inoculated 0.1 mL (3 × 108 CFU/mL) of MRSA in contaminated groups. After 8 days, all rats were killed, wounds were excised and subjected to histopathologic examination, and MRSA counts were determined. MRSA counts in MRSA, MRSA + PRP, MRSA + Vancomycin and MRSA + Vancomycin + PRP groups were 5.1 × 106 (SD ± 0.4) CFU/mL, 4.3 × 106 (SD ± 0.7) CFU/mL, 2.3 × 106 (SD ± 0.3) CFU/mL, 1.1 × 106 (SD ± 0.4) CFU/mL, respectively. The inflammation scores of MRSA + PRP, MRSA + Vancomycin, and MRSA + Vancomycin + PRP groups were significantly lower than the MRSA group. MRSA + Vancomycin + PRP group inflammation score was significantly lower than the MRSA + PRP group. All treatment groups were effective in wound healing and decreasing the MRSA counts. MRSA + PRP combined created identical inflammation scores to the PRP group. More in vivo studies are required to corroborate these findings.

Tài liệu tham khảo